Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KOSHELNYK_TV

Channel

KOSHELNYK_TV

@koshelnyk14

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

35,712subscribers

-181 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001577951382
TypeChannel
Username@koshelnyk14
Created19 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/koshelnyk14

Growth

35,71235,89335,802.56 August 2026 — 35,893 subscribers6 August 2026 — 35,886 subscribers7 August 2026 — 35,869 subscribers8 August 2026 — 35,849 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,829 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,813 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,797 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,785 subscribers13 August 2026 — 35,771 subscribers14 August 2026 — 35,732 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35,712 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -181. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,685–35,920 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 07:5835,712-20
14 Aug 2026, 15:5835,732-39
13 Aug 2026, 04:0435,771-14
12 Aug 2026, 01:1235,785-12
11 Aug 2026, 02:3135,797-16
10 Aug 2026, 05:3135,813-16
9 Aug 2026, 08:2135,829-20
8 Aug 2026, 08:0535,849-20
7 Aug 2026, 10:1335,869-17
6 Aug 2026, 10:3035,886-7
6 Aug 2026, 05:0335,893first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 35,712 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,600
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.848%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held15 (14 June 202627 July 2026)
Views total4,600
Reactions total39
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 03:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 52s
Average length
1m 29s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

952 reactions across 15 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30431.9%
🔥24025.2%
😁828.61%
💯778.09%
👍636.62%
🤣596.20%
🤬323.36%
🤝181.89%
🙏171.79%
🫡141.47%
👌111.16%
🤨60.63%
🏆40.42%
🤔40.42%
😡30.315%
🍓20.21%
🕊20.21%
🗿20.21%
🙈20.21%
🙉20.21%
7 further kinds80.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 952reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 15 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @koshelnyk14. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 June 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 06:54 UTC≈4,600 views39 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Панове, допоможіть добити збір на ремонти автівок, будь ласка!!! https://send.monobank.ua/jar/6cfWUvYBwf Всього 20К залишилось 🫂

31🤔4🏆1👍1🔥1🤨1

15 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC≈8,620 views24 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @dshp78

❗️ ЯК ВБИТИ ШАХЕД? 🔥 Екіпаж перехоплювачів БпЛА «Реднек» 78 ОДШБр. Зачистка неба від ворожих дронів. Екіпаж перехоплювачів БпЛА «Реднек» 78-ї окремої десантно-штурмової бригади 7 корпусу швидкого реагування ДШВ складається всього з двох бійців: «Лексус» і «Нека». Це саме ті, хто виконує бойові завдання з протидії ворожим безпілотним літальним апаратам та не дає їм долетіли до Вашого міста. У цьому випуску ми покаже

23👍1

14 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC≈6,810 views27 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Салют. Нема що Вам сюди цікавого публікувати. Вистачає натхнення тільки на інсту, а просто дублювати пости звідти - трохи брєд. Тому залітайте в інсту - там веселіше. https://www.instagram.com/koshelnyk_tv?igsh=dWJvYTRyMmUyMDA2&utm_source=qr

🤝185👀1🤪1😁1😡1

3 Jul 2026, 03:58 UTC≈9,860 views23 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @VerhovnaRada1488

Банківська карта: 5100947331993196 Кріпта (ТРЦ20): TK2gdhTmxhbs6A5aKPJ5RUc3yT7HNou5ND PayPal: [email protected]

15🤣3👌2🗿2👍1

3 Jul 2026, 03:58 UTC≈7,460 views33 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

13🫡13👌3🏆1👍1🤗1😴1

21 Jun 2026, 10:21 UTC≈10,600 views109 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @Hetmanate2Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥82👍145🤨5🏆2🥰1

21 Jun 2026, 10:20 UTC≈9,010 views103 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @Hetmanate2Video

Нагадуємо

🔥86😁9💯7🍓1

19 Jun 2026, 15:18 UTC≈8,960 views219 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Video

На відео гей стоїть у громадському місці з табличкою, що містить нецензурну лексику. Військовослужбовець зробив цілком зрозуміле зауваження: навколо можуть бути діти, а також попросив не знімати його без згоди, адже він військовий. І що Ви думаєте цей гей проявив хоч краплю поваги? Ні, натомість у відповідь пролунали хамство, зневага та відверте ігнорування прохання. Відео гей опублікував вже у себе в соцмережах. С

103💯69🤬32😁8🔥6💋1

18 Jun 2026, 05:16 UTC≈8,070 views97 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Доброго ранку 👋👋👋

🔥61😁303🤣3

17 Jun 2026, 10:21 UTC≈7,610 views29 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Просто кращі. Збір майже закрито. Давайте добʼємо і хлопці почнуть ремонт. https://send.monobank.ua/jar/9gT2BZ2Rh9

🙏17👌54😁2👍1

16 Jun 2026, 16:37 UTC≈6,980 views81 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @dshp78Photo

🫡 СЗЧ - не вирок. ❗️Повернення із СЗЧ — це можливість виправити помилку та знову стати до строю. 🤝 Кожна ситуація має свої причини. Але сьогодні держава дає шанс повернутися до служби, відновити свої права та продовжити виконувати військовий обов’язок. 🫡 Ми пропонуємо повернутися із СЗЧ за спрощеним алгоритмом. ⚡️ 78 окрема десантно-штурмова бригада 7 корпусу швидкого реагування ДШВ чекає саме на тебе. 🟢 Поверта

🤣4822🔥2🕊2🙈2🙉2👌1👍1

15 Jun 2026, 19:24 UTC≈6,630 views28 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @dshp78Video

⚡️ СЛОВО ВОЇНА БЛІЦ - ЗЕВС 🔥 ЗЕВС — командир танкової роти 78 окремої десантно-штурмової бригади 7 корпусу швидкого реагування ДШВ. ❕У цьому бліці — коротко про службу, бойову техніку та ситуації, що залишаються за кадром щоденної роботи військових. Зокрема, Зевс розповідає про B1 Centauro — італійський колісний танк, що поєднує високу мобільність, точність і потужне озброєння та вже довів свою ефективність на полі

27👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @koshelnyk14. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 457,580 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KOSHELNYK_TV” (@koshelnyk14), 35,712 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/koshelnyk14.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.