Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 소확공 — korean study aesthetic

Channel

소확공 — korean study aesthetic

@korean_lng

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,403subscribers

-168 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002194142898
TypeChannel
Username@korean_lng
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/korean_lng

Growth

13,40313,57113,4877 August 2026 — 13,571 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,562 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,546 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,526 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,516 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,489 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,475 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,448 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,423 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,403 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,378–13,596 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 16:4513,403-20
16 Aug 2026, 13:4613,423-25
14 Aug 2026, 19:2813,448-27
13 Aug 2026, 08:0513,475-14
12 Aug 2026, 06:2213,489-27
11 Aug 2026, 04:1613,516-10
10 Aug 2026, 02:5113,526-20
9 Aug 2026, 05:2113,546-16
8 Aug 2026, 04:5813,562-9
7 Aug 2026, 18:3113,571first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.08%
avg views ÷ 13,403 subscribers
Avg views / post
413
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held47 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total19,419
Reactions total547
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

547 reactions across 32 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35364.5%
💘14626.7%
🥰458.23%
💔30.548%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 547reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🧃 как корейцы выражают удивление и эмоции в переписках в корейских чатах и соцсетях часто используют короткие выражения вместо длинных предложений. это делает переписку живой и эмоциональной ✨ 💜популярные выражения: 💙헐 [холь / heol] — «не могу поверить!» 💙와 [ва / wa] — «вау!» 💙대박 [тэ-бак / daebak] — «круто!», «вау!» 💙아이고 [а-и-го / aigo] — «ой!», «ого!» 💙ㅋㅋ [кк / kk] — смех, как «ха-ха» 💙ㅎㅎ [хх / hh] — лёгкий смех,

3

15 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC311 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

непередаваемый вайб корейских продуктовых магазинов 🍙 소확공 — korean study aesthetic

12💘3🥰2

14 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC407 views27 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🌙 эстетика корейских ночных улочек корейская ночь — это не только сияние неоновых вывесок, но и особенное чувство уюта, когда идёшь по тихой улочке, а где-то пахнет уличной едой детали, которые создают атмосферу: • мягкий свет уличных фонарей, отражающийся в мокром асфальте • звуки далёких разговоров и лёгкий шум шагов • витрины маленьких кафе, в которых всё ещё кто-то пьёт поздний кофе • запах горячих 호떡 [хо-тток

15💘7🥰5

14 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC417 views23 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

💗 разные способы сказать "очень" в корейском много слов для "очень", и каждое звучит по-разному по настроению. • 아주 [а-джу / a-ju] – очень (нейтрально) • 매우 [мэ-у / mae-u] – очень (книжно, официально) • 정말 [чон-маль / jeong-mal] – правда, реально (часто в речи) • 진짜 [чин-ча / jin-jja] – реально, прям (разговорное) • 완전 [ван-чон / wan-jeon] – полностью, капец как (сленгово, молодежно) пример: • 진짜 예뻐! [чин-ча е-ппо

19💘2🥰2

14 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC406 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

эстетика корейских магазинчиков 😉 хотели бы там побывать? 소확공 — korean study aesthetic

20💘6🥰2

13 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC496 views19 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🐨 이 / 그 / 저 — указательные слова в корейском 1. 이 [и / i] — «этот» используется, когда предмет близко к говорящему. 이 책 [и чхэк / i chaek] — эта книга 이 사람 [и са-рам / i saram] — этот человек 2. 그 [кы / geu] — «тот» употребляется, когда предмет близко к собеседнику или уже был упомянут ранее. 그 집 [кы чип / geu jip] — тот дом 그 영화 [кы йон-хва / geu yeonghwa] — тот фильм (который мы обсуждали) 3. 저 [чо / jeo] — «вон

15💘4

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @korean_lng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,329,612 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“소확공 — korean study aesthetic” (@korean_lng), 13,403 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/korean_lng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.