Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 하늘짱 لنتعلم الكورية 🇰🇷

Channel

하늘짱 لنتعلم الكورية 🇰🇷

@korean_in_arabic

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,972subscribers

+35 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001210605606
TypeChannel
Username@korean_in_arabic
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/korean_in_arabic

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,9356,9756,9556 August 2026 — 6,937 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,935 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,939 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,945 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,953 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,942 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,949 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,956 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,950 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,952 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,961 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,975 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,972 subscribers6,9726 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net +35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,929–6,981 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 07:166,972-3
12 Sept 2026, 13:006,975+14
8 Sept 2026, 21:216,961+9
3 Sept 2026, 08:376,952+2
31 Aug 2026, 04:266,950-6
28 Aug 2026, 11:426,956+7
25 Aug 2026, 17:326,949+7
22 Aug 2026, 19:056,942-11
19 Aug 2026, 07:246,953+8
16 Aug 2026, 17:576,945+6
9 Aug 2026, 16:316,939+4
6 Aug 2026, 21:056,935-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:196,937first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 14 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 41 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

507 reactions across 39 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
36672.2%
🔥285.52%
👍254.93%
💔224.34%
❤‍🔥122.37%
👏122.37%
😭122.37%
🥰101.97%
🍓61.18%
👎50.986%
🤗50.986%
👌20.394%
😢10.197%
🤣10.197%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 528 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC661 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026

رفعت فيديو محادثة تعارف بالكوري على اليوتيوب لا تنسو تشوفوها🤩💞

🔥63

9 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC556 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026

الجمل اعلاه هي من بودكاست كوري جدا عجبني وحبيت الحوار وتعلمت منه كثير لذلك قررت انزل لكم كم جملة من الحوار هذا رابط البودكاست اذا حابين تشوفوه https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDCmXlO8lbk وخبروني اذا حابين اكمل تنزيل بقيه النص مع الترجمة

5🔥3

9 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC448 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

아, 그니까 이상형은 사실 막 뭐 외적으로 출중한 사람을 원한다거나 이런 건 아니고요. 좀 그냥 단정했으면 좋겠다.어느 정도 이제 저랑 대화가 맞고 좀 바른 생활을 하면 좋겠다라고 생각을 했는데 이제 보통 그런 분들이 저를 안 좋아하시는 거 같고 음. 그래서 뭔가 만남이 이루어지지 않은 것도 있는 거 같습니다. آه، بخصوص النوع المفضل، في الحقيقة أنا لا أريد شخصاً متميزاً من الناحية الخارجية (شكله) أو ما شابه. أريده فقط أن يكون مرتباً/أنيقاً. كنت أفكر أنه من الجيد أن يكون هناك توافق في الحديث بيننا إلى حد ما، وأن يعيش حياة مستقيمة (صالحة)، ولكن عادة الأ

4

9 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC345 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

근데 막 그 기준이 엄청 까다롭거나 하진 않아요. 정말 기본적인 걸 바라는 건데 그 기본적인게 충족이 많이 안 됐다. ولكن معاييري ليست معقدة جداً أو ما شابه. أنا فقط أطمح لأشياء أساسية جداً، ولكن هذه الأشياء الأساسية لم تكن تُلبّى كثيراً. 💡 كلمات مهمة: 까다롭다 : صعب الإرضاء / معقد. 기본적 : أساسي. 바라다 : يتمنى / يأمل. 충족되다 : يُلبّى / يتم استيفاؤه.

3

9 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC324 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

그게 높은 거예요. 원래 기준이 명확한게 높은 거예요. هذا يعني أنها عالية. في الأصل، وجود معايير واضحة يعني أنها عالية. 💡 كلمات مهمة: 원래 : في الأصل / بطبيعة الحال.

3

9 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC328 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

아니요. 눈이 높은 거 아니고 제 기준이 좀 명확한 편이고.. لا، معاييري ليست عالية، بل أنا من النوع الذي لديه معايير واضحة. 💡 تعبيرات مجازية: 기준 : معيار / مقياس. 명확하다 : واضح / محدد. 📝 قواعد: ~(으)ㄴ 편이다: من النوع الذي / يميل إلى (أنا من النوع الواضح).

3

9 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC311 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

눈이 약간 높으신가 보다 يبدو أن معاييرك (في الرجال) عالية. 💡 تعبيرات مجازية: 눈이 높다 : حرفياً "عيناه مرتفعة"، وتعني (معاييره عالية في اختيار شريك حياته).

3

9 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC309 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

모쏠이긴 한데 뭐 안과 못이 적절히 섞여 있다. أنا كذلك، ولكنني مزيج مناسب بين "لا أريد" و"لا أستطيع". 💡 كلمات مهمة: 적절히 : بشكل مناسب. 섞이다 : يختلط / مدموج.

3

9 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC282 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

연애 "못하는" 모태 솔로가 아니라 이제 "안 하는" 모태 솔로!그럴 가능성이 높지 않나? لستِ 'موتي سولو' لأنك لا تستطيعين المواعدة، بل لأنك لا تفعلين ذلك بإرادتك! أليس هذا الاحتمال كبيراً؟ 💡 قواعد وتعبيرات: 못하다 vs 안 하다: (موت-هادا) تعني لا يستطيع (بسبب ظروف)، بينما (أن-هادا) تعني لا يفعل (بإرادته). 가능성 : احتمالية.

3

9 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC237 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026

이렇게 본인도 되게 깔끔하게 잘 꾸미시는 거 같고 근데 저런 분들은 모태 솔로 그냥 자기 의도인 거야. يبدو أنك تعتنين بمظهرك بشكل أنيق جداً، ولكن الأشخاص مثلك يكونون 'بدون مواعده' بمحض إرادتهم (هم من اختاروا ذلك). 💡 كلمات مهمة: 깔끔하게 : بشكل مرتب / أنيق. 꾸미다 : يزين / يعتني بمظهره. 의도 : نية / قصد.

4

9 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC224 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

칭찬인가 이건 과찬입니다. 감사합니다 هل هذا مديح؟ هذا مبالغة في المديح. شكراً لكم. 💡 كلمات مهمة: 칭찬 : مديح / إطراء. 과찬 : مبالغة في المديح.

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @korean_in_arabic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“하늘짱 لنتعلم الكورية 🇰🇷” (@korean_in_arabic), 6,972 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/korean_in_arabic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.