https://youtu.be/eQAjc7Y-erM
❤9

Channel
@korean_in_arabic
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,972subscribers
+35 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001210605606 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @korean_in_arabic |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/korean_in_arabic |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 6,972 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 6,975 | +14 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 6,961 | +9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 6,952 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 6,950 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 6,956 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 6,949 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 6,942 | -11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 6,953 | +8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 6,945 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 6,939 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 6,935 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:19 | 6,937 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 14 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 41 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
507 reactions across 39 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 366 | 72.2% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 5.52% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 4.93% | |
| 💔 | 22 | 4.34% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 2.37% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 2.37% | |
| 😭 | 12 | 2.37% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 1.97% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 1.18% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.986% | |
| 🤗 | 5 | 0.986% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.394% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.197% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.197% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 528 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtu.be/eQAjc7Y-erM
❤9
رفعت فيديو محادثة تعارف بالكوري على اليوتيوب لا تنسو تشوفوها🤩💞
🔥6❤3
الجمل اعلاه هي من بودكاست كوري جدا عجبني وحبيت الحوار وتعلمت منه كثير لذلك قررت انزل لكم كم جملة من الحوار هذا رابط البودكاست اذا حابين تشوفوه https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDCmXlO8lbk وخبروني اذا حابين اكمل تنزيل بقيه النص مع الترجمة
❤5🔥3
아, 그니까 이상형은 사실 막 뭐 외적으로 출중한 사람을 원한다거나 이런 건 아니고요. 좀 그냥 단정했으면 좋겠다.어느 정도 이제 저랑 대화가 맞고 좀 바른 생활을 하면 좋겠다라고 생각을 했는데 이제 보통 그런 분들이 저를 안 좋아하시는 거 같고 음. 그래서 뭔가 만남이 이루어지지 않은 것도 있는 거 같습니다. آه، بخصوص النوع المفضل، في الحقيقة أنا لا أريد شخصاً متميزاً من الناحية الخارجية (شكله) أو ما شابه. أريده فقط أن يكون مرتباً/أنيقاً. كنت أفكر أنه من الجيد أن يكون هناك توافق في الحديث بيننا إلى حد ما، وأن يعيش حياة مستقيمة (صالحة)، ولكن عادة الأ…
❤4
근데 막 그 기준이 엄청 까다롭거나 하진 않아요. 정말 기본적인 걸 바라는 건데 그 기본적인게 충족이 많이 안 됐다. ولكن معاييري ليست معقدة جداً أو ما شابه. أنا فقط أطمح لأشياء أساسية جداً، ولكن هذه الأشياء الأساسية لم تكن تُلبّى كثيراً. 💡 كلمات مهمة: 까다롭다 : صعب الإرضاء / معقد. 기본적 : أساسي. 바라다 : يتمنى / يأمل. 충족되다 : يُلبّى / يتم استيفاؤه.
❤3
그게 높은 거예요. 원래 기준이 명확한게 높은 거예요. هذا يعني أنها عالية. في الأصل، وجود معايير واضحة يعني أنها عالية. 💡 كلمات مهمة: 원래 : في الأصل / بطبيعة الحال.
❤3
아니요. 눈이 높은 거 아니고 제 기준이 좀 명확한 편이고.. لا، معاييري ليست عالية، بل أنا من النوع الذي لديه معايير واضحة. 💡 تعبيرات مجازية: 기준 : معيار / مقياس. 명확하다 : واضح / محدد. 📝 قواعد: ~(으)ㄴ 편이다: من النوع الذي / يميل إلى (أنا من النوع الواضح).
❤3
눈이 약간 높으신가 보다 يبدو أن معاييرك (في الرجال) عالية. 💡 تعبيرات مجازية: 눈이 높다 : حرفياً "عيناه مرتفعة"، وتعني (معاييره عالية في اختيار شريك حياته).
❤3
모쏠이긴 한데 뭐 안과 못이 적절히 섞여 있다. أنا كذلك، ولكنني مزيج مناسب بين "لا أريد" و"لا أستطيع". 💡 كلمات مهمة: 적절히 : بشكل مناسب. 섞이다 : يختلط / مدموج.
❤3
연애 "못하는" 모태 솔로가 아니라 이제 "안 하는" 모태 솔로!그럴 가능성이 높지 않나? لستِ 'موتي سولو' لأنك لا تستطيعين المواعدة، بل لأنك لا تفعلين ذلك بإرادتك! أليس هذا الاحتمال كبيراً؟ 💡 قواعد وتعبيرات: 못하다 vs 안 하다: (موت-هادا) تعني لا يستطيع (بسبب ظروف)، بينما (أن-هادا) تعني لا يفعل (بإرادته). 가능성 : احتمالية.
❤3
이렇게 본인도 되게 깔끔하게 잘 꾸미시는 거 같고 근데 저런 분들은 모태 솔로 그냥 자기 의도인 거야. يبدو أنك تعتنين بمظهرك بشكل أنيق جداً، ولكن الأشخاص مثلك يكونون 'بدون مواعده' بمحض إرادتهم (هم من اختاروا ذلك). 💡 كلمات مهمة: 깔끔하게 : بشكل مرتب / أنيق. 꾸미다 : يزين / يعتني بمظهره. 의도 : نية / قصد.
❤4
칭찬인가 이건 과찬입니다. 감사합니다 هل هذا مديح؟ هذا مبالغة في المديح. شكراً لكم. 💡 كلمات مهمة: 칭찬 : مديح / إطراء. 과찬 : مبالغة في المديح.
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @korean_in_arabic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“하늘짱 لنتعلم الكورية 🇰🇷” (@korean_in_arabic), 6,972 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/korean_in_arabic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.