Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @akhbarekermansha19 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
58 measurements spanning 87 days, net -2,704. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 21:16
41,768
-20
1 Nov 2026, 20:27
41,788
-33
31 Oct 2026, 18:17
41,821
-26
30 Oct 2026, 17:36
41,847
-22
29 Oct 2026, 18:49
41,869
-9
28 Oct 2026, 17:31
41,878
-13
27 Oct 2026, 20:18
41,891
-9
26 Oct 2026, 21:28
41,900
-22
25 Oct 2026, 18:37
41,922
+41,921
25 Oct 2026, 01:00
1
-41,935
24 Oct 2026, 20:41
41,936
-30
23 Oct 2026, 20:07
41,966
-13
22 Oct 2026, 23:39
41,979
-6
21 Oct 2026, 22:50
41,985
-27
20 Oct 2026, 16:15
42,012
-27
19 Oct 2026, 13:15
42,039
-10
18 Oct 2026, 11:17
42,049
-37
17 Oct 2026, 12:55
42,086
-27
16 Oct 2026, 09:37
42,113
-15
15 Oct 2026, 12:26
42,128
first reading
Engagement
154 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 154 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
32m 02s
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
87 reactions across 48 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
59
67.8%
👍
10
11.5%
🤣
5
5.75%
🔥
4
4.60%
👎
3
3.45%
🥴
3
3.45%
👏
1
1.15%
😍
1
1.15%
🥰
1
1.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 154 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 154 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❇️ موزیک روح الله کرمی بنام زیر_5 🚬
@kordmozik66
…
منو با فاصله گرفتن امتحان نکنید
آدم جالبی نیستم زود فراموش می کنم😅
@kordmozik66
Showing the 12 most recent of 154 posts we hold for @kordmozik66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 14 posts on @kordmozik66 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کانال کلیپ وموزیک کوردی @kordmozik12345 · 81,009 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
کانال اصلی فرهاد جهانگیری @farhadjahangiriorg · 64,384 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
♡ هدفـون موزیـک ♡ @ahedfonmusic · 41,804 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
ریمیکس کردی و فارسی @RiMixkurdi66 · 27,892 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 9 September 2026
آوای لکی @avay_laki · 38,532 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
کانال آهنگ کوردی @kurdahang1 · 39,894 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 1 September 2026
لاتی موزیک ریمیکس اینستاگرامS🍻 @Lati_Muzic · 67,443 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
اهنگ های جدید، ریمیکس های شاد🕺🎧 @MUZIKEME · 55,705 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 22 August 2026
💎کلیپ و موزیک💎 @clipmusic_jaberkp · 35,930 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
Klip_gham_laki @klip_gham_laki · 45,195 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
امیرشرفی | 𝗔𝗠𝗜𝗥𝗦𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗔𝗙𝗜 @amir_kurd_music · 23,426 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
کیجا موزیک @kija_music · 20,050 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 28 September 2026
🎶ریمیکس اهنگ ها شاد قدیمی 🎶 @RMixREMIX · 50,682 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
کافه کوردی & 𝑪𝑨𝑭𝑬𝑲𝑼𝑹𝑫𝑰 @cafekurdii · 57,073 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 August 2026
🎶ݜـهـر مـوزیـڪ🎶 @MUSICSHAHAR · 94,193 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
کورد بروز️️️ @kordberoz · 22,064 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
آهنگ شاد جدید @Muzicshadjadid · 51,167 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
علی احمدیانی @ali_ahmadiany · 75,292 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Pariz_Music @Pariz_Group · 66,194 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 20 August 2026
کرد موزیک | KordMusic @KordMusic · 130,764 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
◇ 𝗖𝗔𝗥 𝗠𝗨𝗦𝗜𝗖 ◇ @CarrMuzic · 32,360 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 5 September 2026
ریمیکس رپی | ʀɪᴍɪx ʀᴀᴘɪ @RimixRAPiii · 63,232 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
غمکده کرمانشاه @ghamkadeh_kermanshah · 100,850 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
کـوردستــان ئـاوا❤️ @kurdestanawa · 80,249 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❤کانال آهنگ کردی ♥️” (@kordmozik66), 41,768 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kordmozik66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.