Отзыв выпускницы курса «Совместимость» ну не смогла не поделиться 😀⭐️😍 А вообще у меня есть ДАЖЕ отдельный канал для отзывов… >>ВОТ ОН: ОТЗЫВЫ<< так как их очень очень много, но каждый в самое сердечко 🧡 благодарю 😇 Вас милые 🥰
❤2

Channel
@korban_astrolog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,346subscribers
-411 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001594904106 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @korban_astrolog |
| Description | ✨ Консультирую тех, кто ищет ответы и перемены. Связаться со мной @astrolog_korban 📚 Обучаю профессии астролога с нуля до эксперта 💫 Пишу о планетах простым языком, без эзотерической «воды» Все услуги: http://www.astrolog-korban.com |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/korban_astrolog |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:40 | 7,346 | -17 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:20 | 7,363 | -26 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:17 | 7,389 | -14 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:51 | 7,403 | -13 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 7,416 | -18 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:17 | 7,434 | -16 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:28 | 7,450 | -31 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 7,481 | -21 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 7,502 | -47 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 7,549 | -46 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 7,595 | -79 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 7,674 | -17 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 7,691 | -24 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 7,715 | -18 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 7,733 | -26 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:25 | 7,759 | -22 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 7,781 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 7,790 | +7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 7,783 | +23 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 7,760 | first reading |
96 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 96 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 4,531 |
| Reactions total | 140 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 00:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,384 reactions across 83 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 649 | 46.9% | |
| 🔥 | 397 | 28.7% | |
| 💯 | 66 | 4.77% | |
| ❤🔥 | 62 | 4.48% | |
| 👍 | 46 | 3.32% | |
| 👏 | 32 | 2.31% | |
| 🤩 | 27 | 1.95% | |
| 🙏 | 26 | 1.88% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 1.37% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 0.939% | |
| 🕊 | 9 | 0.65% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 0.65% | |
| custom 5217608395250485583 | 7 | 0.506% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 0.361% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 0.289% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 0.217% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.217% | |
| 🙉 | 2 | 0.145% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.072% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.072% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.217% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,384 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @korban_astrolog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 96 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (17.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Отзыв выпускницы курса «Совместимость» ну не смогла не поделиться 😀⭐️😍 А вообще у меня есть ДАЖЕ отдельный канал для отзывов… >>ВОТ ОН: ОТЗЫВЫ<< так как их очень очень много, но каждый в самое сердечко 🧡 благодарю 😇 Вас милые 🥰
❤2
Всем доброго времени суток!) Делюсь опытом проведенной консультации. Восторг пары невероятный!!! Они просто в шоке, на сколько 95% информации в «точку». Они радовались, как дети за каждое сказанное слово)). Сами анализировали свое поведение, вспоминали, где было то или это. В общем все сложилось просто супер! Первые 10 минут молодой человек расслабленно сидел в кресле. Потом приосанился и оживился. Отзыв от них был м…
🔥3🕊1😍1
Сегодня Вера (продюссер-голова и стратег), когда я утром ей написала, что сегодня вместо прогноза по Юпитеру во Льве буду записывать разбор натальных карт своих любимых героев ютуба…сказала мне: «они так далеко и всем важнее транзит юпитера». Я не согласилась, тк мне самой было жутко интересно разобраться с их натальными картами. И узнать - кто врет, а кто говорит правду. Кто жертва, а кто абьюзер. Ну что к 21.13 р…
🔥10👍3
Когда ребенок часто обманывает. Разбор натальной карты. ☝🏽
Voice message, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
Лена, здравствуй! Сайт не работает, но у меня карта старшего сына построена от руки. Вообщем ситуация с ним не простая, а может быть со мной. Он вечно обманывает, врет, где правда очевидна. Со мной вообще постоянно в контрах, с отцом иногда находят общие темы. Боюсь, что в период пубертата он вообще отдалиться меня. Хочу быть ему другом и помогать в этот непростом мире
Video message, posted without a caption
ПОЧЕМУ СОВЕТЫ ИЗ ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ КНИГ НЕ РАБОТАЮТ С ВАШИМ РЕБЁНКОМ? Нам говорят: «Не запрещайте ребенку. Это бесполезно. Говорите с ним и объясняйте». Ок, вы объясняете. Спокойно, логично. Уже сто раз! А в ответ слёзы, злость и «не буду». Я как астролог скажу Вам: это база! изучаем базовые планеты 🌙 Луна показывает, когда и какая ребёнку нужна эмоциональная поддержка. 🔥 Марс показывает, как он действует и зачем о…
❤12✍1
Каникулы закончились вопросы остались… сегодня на повестке дня: почему ребенок (сколько бы ему не было лет) не слушается.
😁3
Знаю, вы решите, что я дикая. Но я правда осознанно ехала в поезде как впервые в жизни. Я давно дома 🏡 и знаете что меня впечатляет еще? Меня качает до сих пор 😬😆 🚂 эффект поезда еще со мной. Прикол
🤣6❤3😁1
Когда рейс подвёл: последнее место на поезд через Сызрань и два дня, которые всё окупили План рухнул дважды, но поезд, встреча с первым учителем и ночь под мелатонин сделали поездку сильнее, чем она начиналась. Астролог против трех ретроградных планет ⚡️
❤10🔥7👏3🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @korban_astrolog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что вас пока останавливает от курса Васту?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Астролог | Елена Корбань | ТОП-10” (@korban_astrolog), 7,346 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/korban_astrolog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.