Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تعرفه ممبر زنی

Channel

تعرفه ممبر زنی

@korabara5

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001316972947
TypeChannel
Username@korabara5
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/korabara5

Growth

343.56 August 2026 — 4 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:063-1
13 Aug 2026, 06:484no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:264first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25m 59s
Average length
2m 22s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

2 Jun 2025, 06:04 UTC10 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

ما بهش میگیم هَلی شما چی میگید؟😉 ایشون یکی از خوشمزه ترین و پرطرفدار ترین میوه های فصل بهارِ😁 جاتون خالی امروز با سبزی های باغ هَلی تُکانی کردیم سبزی هایی که استفاده کردم👈🏿 نعناع،سرسم و اوجی بود اینارو خوب سابیدم بعدش با نمک مخلوط کردم این ترکیب خفن با گوجه سبز رو حتما امتحان کنید😋 نسیم شمال می آید در ایتا👇👇 https://eitaa.com/korabara #عضو بشین کانالش واقعا عالیه👇 @korabara

5 Aug 2024, 07:28 UTC26 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @drzanashooyiVideo

‏«صَباح الخير لِعَينيك البَعيدتين.» صبحِ چشم‌های دور از مَنَت به‌خیر...❤️

1 Aug 2024, 12:26 UTC22 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @korabaraPhoto

✨جاده سطلسر بسمت سرچشمه در اطراف لاهیجان نسیم شمال می آید در ایتا👇👇 https://eitaa.com/korabara #عضو بشین کانالش واقعا عالیه👇 @korabara

19 Jul 2024, 19:16 UTC13 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @AvayemehreganVideo

قطعه جوانی ای غم بگو با جوانیم چه کردی • آواز: محمدرضا شجریان • ویولن: همایون خرم ✦♥️✦کانال استاد شجریان✦♥️✦

25 Jun 2024, 13:46 UTC11 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @amarfactPoll

به نظر شما کدامیک از نامزدهای انتخاباتی، بهنچترین عملکرد را در این مناظره داشت؟

  1. زاکانی1%
  2. جلیلی36%
  3. پزشکیان14%
  4. قالیباف47%
  5. پورمحمدی1%
  6. قاضی‌زاده هاشمی1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Jun 2024, 20:34 UTC10 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @amarfactPoll

به نظر شما کدام یک از نامزدهای انتخابات در مناظره سوم بهتر عمل کرد؟

  1. مسعود پزشکیان24%
  2. مصطفی پورمحمدی2%
  3. سعید جلیلی10%
  4. علیرضا زاکانی26%
  5. امیرحسین قاضی زاده هاشمی1%
  6. محمدباقر قالیباف37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jun 2024, 12:51 UTC10 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @amarfactPoll

به نظر شما کدام یک از نامزدهای انتخاباتی با برنامه‌تر است؟

  1. مسعود پزشکیان45%
  2. مصطفی پورمحمدی2%
  3. سعید جلیلی22%
  4. علیرضا زاکانی1%
  5. امیرحسین قاضی زاده هاشمی2%
  6. محمدباقر قالیباف28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jun 2024, 13:00 UTC9 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @siasatcadePoll

شما به کدام یک از نامزدها رای می‌دهید؟

  1. قالیباف7%
  2. پزشکیان44%
  3. جلیلی12%
  4. پورمحمدی3%
  5. زاکانی3%
  6. قاضی‌زاده هاشمی3%
  7. دیدن نتایج29%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jun 2024, 12:10 UTC7 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @khabarfouriPoll

🔹شما در صورت شركت در انتخابات ، به چه كسي راي مي دهيد ؟

  1. پزشکیان38%
  2. جلیلی27%
  3. قالیباف20%
  4. قاضی زاده هاشمی14%
  5. پور محمدی0%
  6. زاکانی1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jun 2024, 11:57 UTC8 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @sepah_news1Poll

به چه کسی رای می‌دهید؟

  1. پزشکیان35%
  2. پورمحمدی2%
  3. قالیباف16%
  4. جلیلی41%
  5. زاکانی2%
  6. قاضی زاده4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jun 2024, 16:59 UTC7 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @korabaraPoll

شهید آیت الله سید ابراهیم رییسی ؛ رییس‌جمهور پروکاری و سخت کوش بود در این شکی نیست ؛؛ آیا طی ۳ سال توانست موافقتی بدست آورد شما چه نمره‌ای می دهید ؟

  1. خوب37%
  2. متوسط25%
  3. ضعیف چ38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @korabara5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jun 2024, 13:46 UTCAnonymous Poll22,400 voters approx.

به نظر شما کدامیک از نامزدهای انتخاباتی، بهنچترین عملکرد را در این مناظره داشت؟

  1. زاکانی1%
  2. جلیلی36%
  3. پزشکیان14%
  4. قالیباف47%
  5. پورمحمدی1%
  6. قاضی‌زاده هاشمی1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Jun 2024, 20:34 UTCAnonymous Poll144,000 voters approx.

به نظر شما کدام یک از نامزدهای انتخابات در مناظره سوم بهتر عمل کرد؟

  1. مسعود پزشکیان24%
  2. مصطفی پورمحمدی2%
  3. سعید جلیلی10%
  4. علیرضا زاکانی26%
  5. امیرحسین قاضی زاده هاشمی1%
  6. محمدباقر قالیباف37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jun 2024, 12:51 UTCAnonymous Poll58,900 voters approx.

به نظر شما کدام یک از نامزدهای انتخاباتی با برنامه‌تر است؟

  1. مسعود پزشکیان45%
  2. مصطفی پورمحمدی2%
  3. سعید جلیلی22%
  4. علیرضا زاکانی1%
  5. امیرحسین قاضی زاده هاشمی2%
  6. محمدباقر قالیباف28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jun 2024, 13:00 UTCAnonymous Poll25,100 voters approx.

شما به کدام یک از نامزدها رای می‌دهید؟

  1. قالیباف7%
  2. پزشکیان44%
  3. جلیلی12%
  4. پورمحمدی3%
  5. زاکانی3%
  6. قاضی‌زاده هاشمی3%
  7. دیدن نتایج29%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jun 2024, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Poll124,000 voters approx.

🔹شما در صورت شركت در انتخابات ، به چه كسي راي مي دهيد ؟

  1. پزشکیان38%
  2. جلیلی27%
  3. قالیباف20%
  4. قاضی زاده هاشمی14%
  5. پور محمدی0%
  6. زاکانی1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jun 2024, 11:57 UTCAnonymous Poll15,300 voters approx.

به چه کسی رای می‌دهید؟

  1. پزشکیان35%
  2. پورمحمدی2%
  3. قالیباف16%
  4. جلیلی41%
  5. زاکانی2%
  6. قاضی زاده4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2024 to 2 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تعرفه ممبر زنی” (@korabara5), 3 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/korabara5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.