Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🍀 Кора Орват | Лига Мечтателей

Channel

🍀 Кора Орват | Лига Мечтателей

@kora_orvat_writer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,128subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001924870287
TypeChannel
Username@kora_orvat_writer
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kora_orvat_writer

Growth

4,1284,1414,134.56 August 2026 — 4,138 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,140 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,141 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,135 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,128 subscribers6 August 202618 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 12 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,126–4,143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 21:464,128-7
12 Aug 2026, 18:064,135-6
9 Aug 2026, 17:434,141+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:504,140+2
6 Aug 2026, 11:034,138first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.1%
avg views ÷ 4,128 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,900
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (18 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total26,642
Reactions total3,264
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 57s
Average length
2m 29s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,596 reactions across 15 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,06757.5%
❤‍🔥55015.3%
🔥2557.09%
😁2446.79%
🥰1403.89%
1032.86%
😍701.95%
😎310.862%
🌚240.667%
🤔230.64%
220.612%
🙏200.556%
💋80.222%
👏70.195%
🤣70.195%
🤩70.195%
40.111%
🍓30.083%
💯30.083%
👀20.056%
4 further kinds60.167%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,596reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 15 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kora_orvat_writer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC882 views106 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

62❤‍🔥27🥰13🌚21😘1

7 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC870 views244 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пробегаю с отпускным фотоспамом ^^ Бесконечно благодарна всем, кто поделился отзывами об обновлении! Неловко, что в поездке не могу ответить, но знайте — я всё прочла и растрогана по самую макушку ❤️

163❤‍🔥44🥰31🔥32😍1

4 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC≈1,890 views273 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Новые главы ваших любимых историй уже вышли, спешите окунуться в миры Лиги Мечтателей!) В ОРП перед Фанни стоит сразу несколько задач: — выяснить, зачем она понадобилась лорду Дэвенпорту — предупредить Мартина о нависшей над ним опасности — закрыть гештальты с родственниками и особняком Успеет ли мисс Фортескью разобраться со всеми этими вопросами и улучит ли минутку-другую на романтику? Вот и узнаем ;)

❤‍🔥20143🥰22🔥2🤔2🤩21

2 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,890 views451 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Чудесные мечтатели, я на две недельки улепётываю в отпуск и самым бессовестным образом оставляю вас без постов и без своего присутствия в чате — надеюсь на понимание, хочется отдохнуть от всего, что связано с работой 🙏 Возможны эпизодические вбросы фоток природы) Если вдруг что-то супер-срочное и неотложное, свистите в личные сообщения тг-канала)

320🔥73❤‍🔥497🤗2

31 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC≈2,050 views311 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 Пока я сижу за компом 24/7, работая над финалом ОРП, дети рассуждают о том, какой бы могла быть третья новелла, если бы за неё взялись они, а не я) #а_поговорить

178🥰68❤‍🔥42😁18🍓2🦄21

29 Jul 2026, 15:39 UTC≈2,220 views274 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ребята, я утром отвечала на вопросы об образе Фанни из подписки — и вижу, что мои формулировки могли оставить негативное впечатление, сожалею об этом и поэтому прихожу к вам с уточнением) Автор не исключён из процесса создания нарядов. В случае подписки для ОРП я предлагала разные варианты, включая образ с индийской эстетикой (прилагаю один из таких вариантов), видела итоговые референсы и работу художников, которая

191❤‍🔥47🤔21👏7😍53

29 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,700 views288 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уже не помню, в какой из глав выловила эту опечатку, но не могу не поделиться. Имелось в виду "поубавилось", а подсознание выдало более драматичный вариант 😱 #о_текст_ты_мем

😁22236🌚22🤣71

27 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC≈2,040 views274 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Теперь, если мне будут говорить, что исторические подробности — это скучно, я отвечу: а если о них расскажет профессор Том? 😏 В чём суть: вышел трёхсерийный документальный фильм о Помпеях с Хиддлстоном в качестве абсолютно противозаконного ведущего. Я уже знаю, что буду смотреть этим вечером 😎 #ты_ж_историк

171😍60🔥372😁21🍓1

27 Jul 2026, 06:45 UTC≈1,980 views235 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🙂😌😌😌😌😌🔘 😌😌 😌😌😌 😌😌😌❓ Меня всё чаще спрашивают, можно ли было развестись в эпоху Регентства. Встречаю версии, что разводы либо не были возможны вообще, либо длились десятилетиями и становились несмываемым пятном на репутации. Давайте разбираться в этом животрепещущем вопросе вместе) 💔 Вероятность В первой половине XVIII века разводы в Англии случались крайне редко, но к началу XIX века их количество возросло. С 17

16945🙏18😍21

26 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC≈2,280 views221 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😎🤓🤓🤓😚🤓😁 Вчера у нас с Владой и Таей прошла замечательная встреча с читателями! Мы впервые попытались организовать такое мероприятие самостоятельно — и блин, кажется, получился не комом ^_^ Огромное спасибо читателям, которые к нам заглянули, художницам Лиги, которые пришли нас поддержать, всем, кто помогал с организацей, задавал вопросы, дарил тепло (и потрясающие подарки тоже!) ❤️ Отдельный поклон админке канала

152🔥43❤‍🔥251

24 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC≈2,240 views186 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Если ваш фаворит – Мартин, то ваша Фанни попробовала не только прокатиться на коньках, но хлебнуть хвойного пива. Что это за напиток и действительно ли он был в ходу в эпоху Регентства? Даю слово Джейн Остин, цитата из её романа "Эмма": — Нет, я помню! — воскликнула Эмма. — Помню как сейчас… Зашёл разговор о хвойном пиве… Ну да, мы с мистером Найтли сказали, что любим хвойное пиво, и мистер Элтон реши

1323714❤‍🔥2👍1

22 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC≈2,340 views249 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мне привычно считать, что мои представления о мужской красоте не очень-то перекликаются с общепринятыми. Нередко мужчины, на которых залипают окружающие, меня оставляют равнодушной, и наоборот – про тех, от кого я в восторге бегаю по потолку, слышу "да он же страшный!" Ну и ладно, всё равно хочу поделиться: среди британских деятелей XIX века подозрительно часто встречаются господа, являющие собой идеал внешности (по

157❤‍🔥53😎31💯3😁2🙏2🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @kora_orvat_writer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTCAnonymous Poll520 voters

Правда или ложь по истории "Одним росчерком пера"🪶

  1. Мартина арестуют#️⃣21%
  2. Эдит попросит Эллиота срочно приехать в Шотландию🏃‍♂️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿10%
  3. Бэзил обвинит Фрэнсис Энн в заговоре против короны😡9%
  4. Фрэнсис Энн попадет на бал дебютанток👧36%
  5. Хьюго застанет Фрэнсис Энн в доме Дэвенпортов🤩14%
  6. Джеральд выйдет на серьезный разговор с отцом 🤙10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTCAnonymous Poll797 voters

Ещё минутка статистики, кто в итоге стал патроном вашей гг в ОРП?)

  1. Леди Каслрой88%
  2. Лорд Сэвидж18%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 211,593 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Seven Hearts Stories – Визуальные новеллы
@sevenheartsstoriesofficial · 87,233
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🍀 Кора Орват | Лига Мечтателей” (@kora_orvat_writer), 4,128 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kora_orvat_writer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.