Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Конспиролог #1

Channel

Конспиролог #1

@konspirolog1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

419subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002403297540
TypeChannel
Username@konspirolog1
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/konspirolog1

Growth

4154194177 August 2026 — 415 subscribers8 August 2026 — 415 subscribers14 August 2026 — 416 subscribers22 August 2026 — 417 subscribers6 September 2026 — 419 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 414–420 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 22:36419+2
22 Aug 2026, 06:46417+1
14 Aug 2026, 20:25416+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:33415no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:27415first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34m 12s
Average length
2m 27s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

126 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱2923.0%
🤔2217.5%
🤯2015.9%
🤬107.94%
👍86.35%
😢64.76%
😨64.76%
53.97%
🔥43.17%
🤨43.17%
😐32.38%
🌚21.59%
👎21.59%
💯21.59%
👏10.794%
💊10.794%
💔10.794%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC49 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Оккультизм в детских мультфильмах 🎬✨

🤔2🔥1🤯1😱1

7 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC59 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Они могут выставить правду на всеобщее обозрение, потому что знают, что люди все равно отмахнутся от неё и будут считать, что сегодня этого не существует 🤷‍♂️🔍.

🤬1🤯1😐1

6 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC71 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чем больше людей проснется, тем меньше у них шансов 😴⏳📉

👍3👏1💯1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC76 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Как изменилась наша еда за 40 лет? 🍽️🥗📅

😱4🌚1🤨1

5 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC80 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Действительно сбивающее с толку странное вещество 🌀, часто упоминаемое как ключевой компонент производства электроэнергии в «старом» мире ⚡🏭. И она не имеет зеркального отражения 🪞❌, чеснок ее отталкивает 🧄🚫. Красная ртуть существует? 🤔💧🔴

🤔3😱2😐1

5 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC86 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Первый случай аутизма у ребенка был диагностирован в 1932 году 📅. Угадайте, когда алюминий впервые добавили в вакцины? 🤔 Правильно, в 1932 году, еще до первого случая ✅.

😢3🤬2🤔1😨1

4 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC94 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В 1950-х Гарвардский психолог Курт Рихтер провёл жёсткий эксперимент: поместил крыс в бассейн с водой, чтобы узнать, как долго они будут цепляться за жизнь. 🐭💧 Выяснилось, что в среднем они сдаются и тонут через 15 минут. Так было с одной группой крыс. ⏳ А что касается второй, прежде чем подопытные сдавались, исследователь доставал их из воды. Сушил, кормил, давал отдохнуть несколько минут и закидывал обратно. У кр

2👍1💯1🔥1🤔1

4 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC152 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Как нас губит современная еда: 🍔🍟🥤

😨2🤔1😱1

3 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC108 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Коротко о зеленой повестке из Европы 🌍🇪🇺 Детское рабство в Демократической Республике Конго 🇨🇩👶. Каждый электромобиль 🚗⚡ использует кобальт, который добывают эти дети. Очень зеленая энергетика 🌱🔋 Величайший обман в современной истории 🤥📜

🤯4😱2💔1🤔1😢1

3 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC116 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Без комментариев...

😱4🤔2🤯1

2 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC121 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

«Нам пора начинать есть младенцев» 🍼💀 Такие гениальные идеи выдают климатические активисты 🌍🌱. К слову, все подобные климатические шоу оплачиваются Фондом Сороса, вот откуда ноги растут 💸🦶.

🤬4🤯2😱2

2 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC125 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Полиция помыслов уже появилась на родине Оруэлла 🕵️‍♂️📚 В Великобритании мужчину арестовали за пост в соц.сети, который был даже не за его авторством, но, якобы, «вызвал тревогу» у человека в интернете 🌐🚨: — Почему на мне наручники из-за того, что ОН выложил, а потом Я поделился? 🤔🔗 — Потому что пост в соцсетях вызвал у кого-то тревогу. Поэтому вас и арестовали 🚔⛓️. В будущем людей действительно будут арестовывать

😱3😢2🤨1😨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @konspirolog1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Конспиролог #1” (@konspirolog1), 419 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/konspirolog1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.