|НАБОР| ~возвращение ~ набор на 1 сезон битвы экстрасенсов от митяя - рады видеть каждого!! (не принимаем не активных участников) участники 4\13 жюри. 1\3 связь: @nmmnmnnmnmnn

Channel
Битва экстрасенсов | Ванёк
@konkesk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
67subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002432430088 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @konkesk |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/konkesk |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 67 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 68 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 69 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 69 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 6 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 18s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
73 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5269453521006119967 | 25 | 34.2% | |
| custom 5352815816859458078 | 20 | 27.4% | |
| custom 5330065083034780538 | 18 | 24.7% | |
| custom 5359490810217768284 | 10 | 13.7% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 27 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
возвращение?!
https://t.me/rolkabitvas
Я объявляю зрительское голосование! Уважаемые зрители, теперь у вас есть возможность оценить экстрасенсов. Пример оценивания: Ванг - 10 Лена - 10 Шепс - 10 ‼️ • Правила оценивания: • Голосовать можно только с подпиской • Голосование продлится до 13.01.2026 10:00 • С каналов - нельзя • Оценивать надо сразу трёх • Голос удален - засчитан
Signed Ванёк
Последней участники достали конверт с фотографией Джулия Ванг Оценки членов жюри: Ваня Блиг: 3 Вика Хайли: 4 Юлий Котов: 4 Средней балл от членов жюри: 3,8 балла Оценки от экстрасенсов: Виктория Райдос: 2 Николь Кузнецова: 7 Влад Череватый: 4 Марьяна Романова: 4 Саманта и Патриция: 4 Артем Краснов: 3 Средний балл от экстрасенсов: 4 балла В сумме Джулия набирает 7,8 баллов из 20 возможных
custom 53528158168594580784custom 52694535210061199672custom 53300650830347805382
Signed Ванёк
Реакции на последние два поста
Signed Ванёк
Следуюшим участники достали конверт с фотографией Олега Шепса Оценки членов жюри: Ваня Блиг: 6 Вика Хайли: 5 Юлий Котов: 6 Средней балл от членов жюри: 5,8 баллов Оценки от экстрасенсов: Виктория Райдос: 10 Николь Кузнецова: 10 Влад Череватый: 9 Марьяна Романова: 8 Саманта и Патриция: 9 Артем Краснов: 8 Средний балл от экстрасенсов: 9 баллов В сумме Олег набирает 13,8 баллов из 20 возможных
custom 53300650830347805383custom 52694535210061199672custom 53528158168594580781
Signed Ванёк
Мы приступаем к оцениванию. Все участники достали конверт с фотографией Елены Ивашиной Оценки членов жюри: Ваня Блиг: 3 Вика Хайли: 3 Юлий Котов: 3 Средней балл от членов жюри: 3 балла Оценки от экстрасенсов: Виктория Райдос: 1 Николь Кузнецова: 7 Влад Череватый: 3 Марьяна Романова: 2 Саманта и Патриция: 3 Артем Краснов: 1 Средний балл от экстрасенсов: 2,8 балла В сумме Елена набирает 5,8 баллов из 20 во…
custom 52694535210061199672custom 53594908102177682842custom 53528158168594580781
Signed Ванёк
Последняя испытание прошла Джулия Ванг думаю, что владелец предмета - девушка. молодая, стройная, милая, приятная, не грубая, у нее много друзей и она прям притягивает. возраст от 15 до 25, волосы рыжие как будто либо шатенка.
custom 52694535210061199673custom 53528158168594580783custom 53300650830347805382
Signed Ванёк
Следующий испытание прошел Олег Шепс Мне кажется этот мох принадлежит девушке. Её возраст в пределах 13-16 лет. У нее волосы свтелого оттенка,глаза очень красивые,возможно карие. Рост средний,по характеру она интересная. Неоднозначная,для тех с кем уже хорошо подружилась,она открывается с наилучшей стороны,часто заботится,переживает. Для тех кто ей еще не знаком она относится с настороженностью. Сама по себе она доб…
custom 53300650830347805384custom 53594908102177682842custom 52694535210061199671
Signed Ванёк
Первой испытание прошла Елена Ивашина Женщина, 25-41 год, добрая, позитивная, самоуверенная, верная, искренная, эмоциональная, дружелюбная, любящая, умная, спортивная, доброжелательная, хорошо раньше училась, есть отношения, есть домашнее животное
custom 53300650830347805382custom 53528158168594580782custom 53594908102177682841
Signed Ванёк
Задание для ПЕРВОЙ ТРОЙКИ Перед экстрасенсами ДЕКОРАТИВНЫЙ МОХ, а вот смогут они подробно описать владельца этого предмета? ПРАВИЛЬНЫЙ ОТВЕТ: Этот мох принадлежит парню, 16 лет, голубые глаза, кудрявые волосы, учится не плохо, есть отношения, домашних животных нет, рост 179 см, не любит новые знакомства, всегда готов отстаивать личные границы, худшее качество человека, которое не терпит герой- это лицемерие
custom 53528158168594580783custom 52694535210061199672custom 53300650830347805381
Signed Ванёк
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @konkesk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@konkesk named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Битва экстрасенсов | Ванёк” (@konkesk), 67 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/konkesk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.