Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Логово Коньки (Konia LPS)

@konialpss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,160subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002313770826
TypeChannel
Username@konialpss
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/konialpss

Growth

1,1571,1691,1636 August 2026 — 1,157 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,158 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,169 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,160 subscribers1,1606 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,155–1,171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:051,160-9
10 Aug 2026, 14:511,169+11
7 Aug 2026, 19:011,158+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:461,157first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.5%
avg views ÷ 1,160 subscribers
Avg views / post
842
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held12 (30 June 202626 July 2026)
Views total3,366
Reactions total121
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

374 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14238.0%
🥰8923.8%
❤‍🔥4211.2%
👏308.02%
🤩256.68%
😭215.61%
💯112.94%
👀82.14%
😱61.60%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 374reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC680 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

2 ВОЛНА КОДЫ ДЛЯ РОССИИ 🌟 Большое спасибо паремо, что завезли и эту волну в Россию! 😘 Подписывайтесь на их тикток Коды проверены! 🐰 Делитесь в комментах кого уже из блайндов 2 волны успели приобрести? У меня оттуда с турции фигурки: панда, овчарка, мейнкун, козлик 🌟 #конька_g7 #конька_коды 🦋 Конька в ВК | Пинтересте | ТикТоке | тгк с чеклистами 🦋

🤩25🔥5😭3🥰1

15 Jul 2026, 13:54 UTC992 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @evelpsgirlVideo

👻🎃 ОБЗОР НА ХЕЛЛОУИНСКИХ LPS BOOS & BOWS 🎃👻

🔥24💯6

15 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC888 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @evelpsgirlPhoto

Эта LPS коллекция - просто восторг 🤩

❤‍🔥32💯5🥰5

15 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC806 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🌟 Пока мои руки не доходят до большого поста с новеллами 6 волны и того, что мы ждем! Eve LPS Girl уже отыскала по летнему хэллуинскую коллекцию. Обзоры получились отличные! Смотрим!

🔥15

8 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC≈1,210 views73 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌟 27.06 x 04.07 Sweet 23 🐾 - У вас к глазах кивится 🐱 #конька_моментс #конька_фото

🔥47🥰16👏8❤‍🔥2

7 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC985 views70 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

омг, это что итоги 🌟 Победители, пишите в личку @piavoshka 🌟

🥰45👏11🔥6😱6❤‍🔥2

3 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC≈1,420 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Канал с чеклистами! Пока мы все с вами напряженно ждем результатов конкурса, напоминаю о том, что у меня есть канал с чеклистами! 🌟 Вот тута: https://t.me/checklistskonia В канале есть ВСЕ молды 2 и 7 поколения! Чек листы обновлены до 5 волны + в некоторых даже есть 6. Заходите, пользуйтесь, чмоки чмоки 🌟 #конька_чеклист

🔥20👏6🥰4

2 Jul 2026, 08:38 UTC≈3,300 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥18😭12❤‍🔥6👏5👀4🥰1

2 Jul 2026, 08:38 UTC≈1,190 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Финальное голосование! Голосование завершится 3 июля в 23:59 (я ошиблась в самом голосовании) 🌟🌟

🥰17😭6

30 Jun 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,030 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ГОЛОСОВАНИЕ: часть 2

👀4

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @konialpss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 496,505 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Логово Коньки (Konia LPS)” (@konialpss), 1,160 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/konialpss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.