i was always here

Channel
King Kong’s Calls
@kongscalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001516524263 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kongscalls |
| Description | Only the best calls for BSC + ETH. Contact @KingKongCaller |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 19 September 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kongscalls |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 2 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:49 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 February 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
- Links
- 5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
💀💀💀💀
🎁
All crypto going Down lately
AngelMoon | BSC TG: @angelmoonbsc Chart: https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x637e86be9f9708631cf90b78b76bb9f1fd40fa41 Ca: 0x637e86be9f9708631cf90b78b76bb9f1fd40fa41 Same dev team From rat girl and baby Betcoin so they won’t give up easy. 8% BUSD rewards and NFTs coming. 19k mc
Elon Musk just replied to Elon MUUsk tweet!!!! They are flying good go crazy. https://twitter.com/ajtourville/status/1572973226648649728?s=46&t=ylV1WzMrLHeUh4OPg_vxqw Chart: https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xd8faa4f6707a523f7bd3e2ae6b898a27a9490001 Tg: @ElonMUuskOfficial Ca: 0xd8faa4f6707a523f7bd3e2ae6b898a27a9490001
Hi
Hope y’all printed on this! I’m not really here in the space for long maybe you can share with friends! I know how to read contracts and a lot of calls are bad! So I’m trying to give only good ones!
Lansseax | BSC Deployed from Degem deployer that hit 15 mill mc. safe dev has ownership of CA - seems like lots of plans for Utility straight from dev: 500 nfts will be live to mint 1 day after the website drop (All profits made from NFT sells will be donated to charity's of your choice and buybacks) Minting price will be 0.08bnb per mint (Level 1,2,3. 1 being the highest and 3 being the lowest) - more info about …
Gm everyone
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kongscalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@kongscalls named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“King Kong’s Calls” (@kongscalls), 2 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kongscalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.