Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

komvarand

@komvarand

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,118subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002119254805
TypeChannel
Username@komvarand
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/komvarand

Growth

1,1171,1201,118.56 August 2026 — 1,117 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,117 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,120 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,118 subscribers1,1186 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,117–1,120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:141,118-2
9 Aug 2026, 21:121,120+3
7 Aug 2026, 03:071,117no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:211,117first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.6%
avg views ÷ 1,118 subscribers
Avg views / post
186
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,535
Reactions total100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54630324988102906505151.0%
custom 53461411155589421672727.0%
custom 53732176588397857701212.0%
custom 54542542427872580071010.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC36 viewsread 6 August 2026

Друзья, у нас забрали ещё один билет на коллажный кинопоказ. Уже шесть человек решились! А стулья свободные ещё есть. Не будем говорить, откуда их берем. Но у вас есть повод поторопиться с бронью — как пирожки разбирают. @barvarbarvar

6 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC82 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На коллажный кинопоказ занято уже 5 мест, свободные стульчики ещё есть! Пойдёшь? 🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟 а? 🌟🌟🌟 @barvarbarvar

custom 53461411155589421672

6 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC81 viewsread 6 August 2026

На коллажики забрали один парный билет. Вы можете также❤️

6 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC97 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Евгений, не знаю, кто ты, но ты лучший❤️ загляни на кинопоказ в субботу!

custom 54630324988102906505custom 53461411155589421674custom 54542542427872580072

6 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC113 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

несколько слов о предстоящих выходных❤️ наши мероприятия: суббота: коллажный кинопоказ воскресенье: чилаут по росписи шоперов мы будем очень благодарны, если вы поделитесь хотя бы с одним другом нашими мероприятиями! Для нас это очень важно, ведь это шанс найти тех, кому мы нужны🐻 забронировать себе стульчик 🍎@barvarbarvar Если по какой-то причине вы не можете к нам прийти, но вы хотели бы поддерживать наш проект

custom 546303249881029065010custom 53461411155589421677custom 53732176588397857706

5 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC130 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Заглядывайте к нашим друзьям в эту пятницу❤️

custom 54630324988102906501

5 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC127 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @pil_rndPhoto

Соскучились по душевным вечерам, где можно послушать старые песни и долго подпевать их под гитару? Подвигаться в такт акустической музыки?✨ Тогда этот квартирник для вас!🥰 На вечере выступят: 💿 Дарья Кравченко (Овсянка) 💿 Елизавета Вернадская 💿 Кирилл Леонье 💿 Валерия Барсук 💿 Danya Soma Приходи, чтобы не очнуться осенью и не сказать, что лето прошло зря 💔 После Квартирника будем петь караоке и (во время всего ве

custom 54630324988102906504custom 53732176588397857701custom 54542542427872580071

5 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC234 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Давно не виделись с подружкой и не знаешь, куда её сводить? А может быть, в твоей жизни настало время романтики, и как никогда хочется ярких эмоций и запоминающихся моментов? не подумай, что мы не учли твоё возможное одиночество — когда не знаешь, куда себя приткнуть, и уже потихоньку начинаешь разговаривать со стеной. На всё один ответ — парный билет. Сегодня раздаём парные билеты на чилаут по коллажам и чилаут по

custom 53461411155589421672custom 54630324988102906501

5 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC148 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На чилаут по росписи шопперов записались уже три человека. Заказываем материалы! Если хочешь принять участие в мероприятии — дай знать, чтобы мы заказали материалы и для тебя 🍎 @barvarbarvar

custom 54630324988102906504

4 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC174 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На чилаут по коллажам забрали три места. Ещё несколько свободных стульев осталось, держим в курсе❤️ места бронирует 🍎 @barvarbarvar

custom 53461411155589421674custom 54630324988102906504

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @komvarand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

Как считаете: какое мероприятие сделает ваш выходной нереально ярким на этой неделе?

  1. Чилаут по коллажам🌟🌟63%
  2. Чилаут по росписи шоперов🌟🤩🤩38%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 40,652 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“komvarand” (@komvarand), 1,118 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/komvarand.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.