Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Anastasia Komori

Channel

Anastasia Komori

@komorianastasia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,781subscribers

+99 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001500862549
TypeChannel
Username@komorianastasia
CreatedBetween 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/komorianastasia

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,6816,7816,73112 August 2026 — 6,682 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,682 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,681 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,704 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,715 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,718 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,720 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,709 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,742 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,756 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,769 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,777 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,781 subscribers12 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 37 days, net +99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,666–6,796 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 15:366,781+4
13 Sept 2026, 11:406,777+8
9 Sept 2026, 09:396,769+13
3 Sept 2026, 23:386,756+14
31 Aug 2026, 10:046,742+33
28 Aug 2026, 03:366,709-11
25 Aug 2026, 12:466,720+2
22 Aug 2026, 16:056,718+3
19 Aug 2026, 04:346,715+11
16 Aug 2026, 15:146,704+23
12 Aug 2026, 13:446,681-1
12 Aug 2026, 03:006,682no change
12 Aug 2026, 02:486,682first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5,795 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,50194.9%
🗿2945.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,795 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
34
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 18 we hold a reading for · 78%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @komorianastasia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,260 views321 reactions3 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

You've already caught in my web 🕸 Ты уже попался в мою паутину 🕸

300🗿21

16 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈1,850 views272 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Spidey faces a difficult choice ❤️‍🔥 MercuryGin as Gwen ✨ Паучку предстоит сложный выбор ❤️‍🔥 MercuryGin в образе Гвен ✨

262🗿10

14 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,570 views301 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Face it tiger... you just hit the jackpot! 🔥 Fanservice version of MJ set 🕸 Смирись, тигр... ты только что сорвал джекпот 🔥 Фансервисная версия сета Эм-Джей 🕸

279🗿22

12 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈2,890 views336 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

So which of the spider-girls suits me better? 👀 Так кто же из девушек-паучков мне больше идёт? 👀

316🗿20

12 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC≈2,410 views356 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @s_g_g_pPhoto

Вам Komori Jane или Komori Stacy 🕸

339🗿17

10 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈3,090 views315 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

The first set of the month also includes solo photos of MJ 🕸 I’ve already cosplayed her once, based on J. Scott Campbell’s artwork, but this time I decided to go with her original comic book style ❤️ Помимо парных фото, в первый сет месяца входят и сольные фото Эм-Джей 🕸 Я уже косплеила ее однажды по мотивам работ Джея Скотта Кэмпбелла, но в этот раз решила выбрать её оригинальный образ из комиксов ❤️

299🗿16

8 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈3,270 views269 reactions3 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Teaser for the first set of August on my platforms ✨ The eternal question: Gwen Stacy or Mary Jane? 🕸 Another collaboration with MercuryGin 🔥 Тизер первого сета Августа ✨ Вечный вопрос: Гвен Стейси или Мэри Джейн? 🕸 Серия коллаб с MercuryGin продолжается 🔥 Сет будет доступен донам месяца на Бусти и ВК ✨

258🗿11

30 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC≈4,240 views377 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Smile. I already won 🔥 One day left to join my platforms for July rewards 💫 Улыбнись. Я уже победила 🔥 Успей оформить подписку на Бусти или ВК до конца июля, чтобы получить больше фото с сетов месяца 💫

350🗿27

28 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC≈4,190 views393 reactions4 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

There’s a new sheriff in town🤠 В городе новый шериф 🤠

369🗿24

26 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC≈4,750 views373 reactions2 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Fanservice version of Jessie set✨ Barbie isn't the only one who knows how to pick out new outfits 👀 А вот и тизер фансервисной версии сета Джесси ✨ Подбирать себе новые наряды умеет не только Барби 👀

362🗿11

26 Jul 2026, 06:16 UTC≈4,110 views300 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Shooting week in Almaty: done ✨ We shot 4 collab sets and one mobile solo, went up to the mountains, and visited the Museum of Modern Art. I love it when the boss (me) sends me on work trips like this❤️ Let's get this post to 400 reactions, and I'll show you some behind-the-scenes sneak peeks from the shoots. 👀 Съемочная неделя в Алматы - всё✨ 4 коллабных сета и один мобильный сольник, съездили в горушки и в музей

280🗿20

24 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC≈3,700 views292 reactions4 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Choose your side 💫 Какой ракурс лучше? 💫

274🗿18

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @komorianastasia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anastasia Komori” (@komorianastasia), 6,781 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/komorianastasia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.