Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Комета Магазин - Мастерская

@kometapc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,577subscribers

-72 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002930835832
TypeChannel
Username@kometapc
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kometapc

Growth

1,5771,6491,6137 August 2026 — 1,649 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,649 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,643 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,607 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,577 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -72. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,566–1,660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:271,577-30
11 Aug 2026, 00:111,607-36
8 Aug 2026, 01:071,643-6
7 Aug 2026, 16:331,649no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:311,649first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.5%
avg views ÷ 1,577 subscribers
Avg views / post
780
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (26 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total10,139
Reactions total354
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

354 reactions across 13 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9326.3%
👍6016.9%
4913.8%
🎉277.63%
👎154.24%
💘154.24%
🏆133.67%
👏133.67%
😱133.67%
🆒113.11%
🥰82.26%
😢71.98%
👌51.41%
💋41.13%
🥴41.13%
❤‍🔥30.847%
🫡30.847%
🍌20.565%
🕊20.565%
🤬20.565%
5 further kinds51.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 354reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC195 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Я вам не верю!" Именно это сообщение получил наш менеджер от одной из клиенток. После такого явно нужно объясниться... Земляне, скажем сразу. Все дело в нашей обновленной линейке КВАРЦ, а если быть точнее - в том, как мы ее представили. Клиентка не поверила, что на сайте размещены действительно настоящие изображения живых компьютеров. Услышав такое менеджер сразу обратился в контент-отдел за доказательствами *Дели

🥰6👍5👏4

3 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC406 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Земляне, мы уже на финишной прямой, делимся с вами небольшой частью материалов нашего обновленного ОКСИГЕНА. Релиз уже близко! *На фото флагман - ОКСИГЕН IX*

🔥5🆒5🍌2👎2👾1💘1

2 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC477 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Земляне, нам ответили все победители, один из которых отказался от приза и попросил разыграть его среди вас! Поздравляем счастливчика Ne4kot (@ne4kot) занявшего 6 место - Корпус Formula V Line G9 PA

🎉14👏8👍42👌1🔥1😁1

2 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC955 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Выбор дополнительных победителей (в количестве 1): 🏆 Победитель: 1. Ne4kot (@ne4kot) ✔️Проверить результаты

🎉7👎5🫡3🤬2🥰2👌1👏1🤡1

31 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC651 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дорогие победители, на связи Максим, контент-менеджер КОМЕТЫ! Связался с вами с аккаунта - @shmaxlab. Все подробности у вас в личных сообщениях. P.S. Всем выжившим: один из наших победителей отказался от приза и попросил его разыграть среди вас! Сделаем реролл через 3 дня уже как минимум одного призового места.

🔥17😱136👍3👌1🤯1

31 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC645 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Станция КОМЕТА прямо сейчас перехватила обрывок зашифрованного сообщения: "Земляне, не расстраивайтесь. Совсем скоро будет еще один большой розыгрыш всесте с ... мы вместе подготовили целы ..." дальше сообщение окончательно обрывается. Наши связисты пытались установить источник сигнала, но пока безуспешно. Мы уверены, что у них получится, просто нужно больше времени. Оставайтесь на связи, приближается что-то грандио

🔥86👌2👍2❤‍🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 13:06 UTC668 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Земляне, скоро свяжемся со всеми победителями! Спасибо за участие! P.S. Если кто-то не выйдет на связь в течении трёх дней, выберем счастливчика заново.

🔥128👍3

31 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,410 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. Den (@SkyReg11) 2. Амлет (@Kremlickk) 3. Макс (@maxfox81) 4. ∑ŖŗôᏒ (@error_horizont) 5. Данил 6. Х (@ARIAVOIN90) 7. Гуля (@GuliaRin87) 8. артефисе (@arteficee) 9. Наталья (@Alekseevna_Nataly) 10. Александр (@sanek_rnd161) ✔️Проверить результаты

👍16👎8😢7🎉61

30 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC≈2,840 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Земляне, сегодня последняя возможность принять участие в РОЗЫГРЫШЕ! Уже завтра в 16:00 подведем итоги!

🔥208👍8❤‍🔥2🕊2💘1🆒1

29 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC606 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Земляне, хотим показать вам немного «внутренней кухни» На фото новый ОКСИГЕН III, совсем скоро выйдет большое обновление каждой модели в линейке. Сейчас пытаемся нащупать ту самую атмосферу, и, кажется, мы уже близко! Как вам?

🔥1211💘7🌭1🆒1

28 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC439 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Перешел с PS5 на СПУТНИК III Наши ряды ПК-бояр пополнил еще один Землянин! Максим долгое время играл на PS5 в Fortnite и GTA, но настал момент, когда консоль надоела и захотелось попробовать настоящий ПК-гейминг. В заданный бюджет рассматривали несколько систем, но в итоге остановились на модели из нашей стартовой линейки СПУТНИК III. Компьютер без проблем потянет новые AAA-тайты с комфортным FPS на высоких настройк

👍7🔥7💘4🆒3

27 Jul 2026, 20:43 UTC403 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Земляне, просто оставим этот отзыв здесь... "Клиентоориентированность 100% : вежливые, внимательные, сразу знают что предложить, исходя из потребности. ВАЖНО - у ребят НЕТ задачи стрясти с покупателей как можно больше денег, втюхав ненужные комплектующие и т.п. Ребята соберут товар максимально внимательно к вашим пожеланиям и бережно к бюджету (особенно это актуально, если компьютер для ребенка - подберут в соответс

👍12🔥11🥴4

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kometapc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 222,167 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Комета Магазин - Мастерская” (@kometapc), 1,577 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kometapc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.