Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Komaru Smart GEM 🪷

@komaruqq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,935subscribers

-201 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002195980046
TypeChannel
Username@komaruqq
DescriptionТУТ только годные темки на которых можно заработать Ссылка: https://t.me/+InYpRIbtz2Q0Y2Ri Менеджеры: @tocatcrypto, @dealerduck, @crptbomj, @PsixXx20, @TonySWork, @Sa4iz1k, @C0NFES5, @qzxsc13 @melisseze @ayla778 Владелец: @mirrorjpg
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/komaruqq

Growth

14,93515,13615,035.57 August 2026 — 15,136 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,136 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,131 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,096 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,062 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,037 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,004 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,962 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,935 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -201. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,905–15,166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:1914,935-27
12 Aug 2026, 22:3714,962-42
11 Aug 2026, 21:0215,004-33
10 Aug 2026, 18:2715,037-25
9 Aug 2026, 20:5815,062-34
8 Aug 2026, 23:3115,096-35
8 Aug 2026, 00:2015,131-5
7 Aug 2026, 13:0115,136no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:5215,136first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.0%
avg views ÷ 14,935 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,690
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.811%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held39 (27 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total104,750
Reactions total849
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
623
Videos
5
Links
524

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

849 reactions across 39 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🦄29134.3%
20123.7%
😈18421.7%
🤷‍♀17320.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 849reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,420 views23 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

$BNB закрыл

🦄7🤷‍♀6😈64

13 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC≈2,840 views25 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

$XRP сейчас цена снова пришла в серую зону, здесь хочу увидеть нормальный откуп и удержание района 1.005-1.006 если начнут возвращать цену, первым делом смотрю движение в район 1.016-1.018 тут интереснее ловить отскок @komaruqq @okx

🦄11😈65🤷‍♀3

13 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC≈2,830 views20 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

$BNB пришли обратно в район 610.7, здесь хочу увидеть нормальный откуп после возврата выше зоны если удержат ретест, первым делом смотрю движение обратно в район 614.5-615 тут интереснее ловить продолжение вверх @komaruqq @okx

9🦄7😈4

13 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC≈2,870 views20 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

$TUT снизу уже пришли в зону где хочу увидеть нормальный откуп, после такого слива догонять шорт вообще не хочется если отсюда начнут возвращать цену, первым делом смотрю движение в район 0.044–0.045 тут интереснее ловить отскок @komaruqq @okx

🦄119

13 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC≈2,720 views22 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

$PUMP закрыл так 🚀

8🦄7😈5🤷‍♀2

12 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC≈2,830 views25 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

$PUMP сейчас сидим внутри диапазона и по картинке мне больше нравится еще один заход к нижней границе, там уже будет понятно держат ее или нет если 0.00263 снова быстро выкупят, отсюда уже смотрю возврат к верхам в район 0.00285 хочу увидеть еще один нормальный тест снизу @komaruqq @okx

🦄11🤷‍♀86

12 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC≈2,710 views18 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

$XLM сейчас тянут к локальным лоям и по картинке мне больше нравится вариант со снятием ниже если дадут быстрый возврат от 0.1585, отсюда уже интересно смотреть лонг в сторону 0.1630 пока просто жду цену пониже @komaruqq @okx

7🤷‍♀7🦄4

12 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC≈2,640 views17 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Шортим $LAB? 👀

🦄8🤷‍♀6😈3

11 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC≈2,150 views20 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Вообще, есть идея того, что произошло недавно на рынке в Корее произойдет и на рынке Американских акций..

🦄8🤷‍♀64😈2

11 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC≈2,220 views19 reactionsread 14 August 2026

По рынку пока без особой активности Рабочих сетапов не вижу, поэтому остаюсь вне позиции и жду более понятной структуры Сейчас лучше сохранить капитал, чем искать вход там, где его нет

10😈5🤷‍♀4

11 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC≈2,320 views19 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🟣ПО BTC ОБЗОР По дневному графику BTC после падения с $82,8k перешёл в консолидацию около $60–65k. В долгосрок ключевая зона — $58–60k. Пока она держится, возможен разворот с целями $70k —$80–83k. Пробой $58k вниз заметно ухудшит картину. Сейчас BTC около $64k, а рынок остаётся волатильным. Долгосрочно: нейтрально-позитивно, если удержат $58–60k Торгую где ? правильно ТУТ - OKX 🏠

🦄11😈5🤷‍♀3

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @komaruqq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Komaru Smart GEM 🪷” (@komaruqq), 14,935 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/komaruqq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.