Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UPSCfied with Komal Mavi, AIR 314 CSE'25

Channel

UPSCfied with Komal Mavi, AIR 314 CSE'25

@komal_mavi314

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,566subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003327295688
TypeChannel
Username@komal_mavi314
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/komal_mavi314

Growth

5,5585,5665,5627 August 2026 — 5,564 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,564 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,563 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,558 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,562 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,566 subscribers7 August 202618 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,557–5,567 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 00:235,566+4
14 Aug 2026, 22:455,562+4
11 Aug 2026, 17:155,558-5
8 Aug 2026, 19:235,563-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:485,564no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:385,564first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.2%
avg views ÷ 5,566 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,020
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.465%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held21 (20 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total76,390
Reactions total355
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

355 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21660.8%
🔥8724.5%
👍226.20%
🫡185.07%
👏30.845%
🆒20.563%
🕊20.563%
👌10.282%
😍10.282%
😎10.282%
🤔10.282%
🥰10.282%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 355reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC≈1,920 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Hello all, If you need Free Mains answer writing practise(daily as well as full tests) with quality questions, along with evaluation, AI tutoring and other relevant stuff, you may join the channel where one of my batchmates, Rahul Shekhar, Rank 75 this year and 242 last year. https://t.me/rahulshekhar_75 The platform link is : https://leanprep.in/ Best wishes

10

8 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC≈2,340 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Hello everyone I am quite busy in shopping and packing nowadays. Never realized shopping could be this hectic, but this is what I prayed for! So very grateful 🙏🏻♥️ Will be uploading the remaining notes/material very soon. Do not worry.

79👍2🕊2🤔1

31 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTC≈4,380 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1-5frJEdKUhHtURsAmNHo1iVWneO6J4hh

4

31 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTC≈4,320 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Lovepreet sir’s notes for Chemistry optional. Quite useful, you can refer to these.

6

31 Jul 2026, 03:42 UTC≈4,420 views165 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

I wanted to address this sick mentality. It would have been more convenient for me to ignore this comment, but I do not choose to let any random online comment disregard my credibility. Every person, irrespective of where they come from or where they stand, can offer something to learn for. This is what my upbringing has taught me. Numbers don’t define your worth, whether selected or not selected, but sometimes stat

🔥8157🫡18👍3👏3🆒2👌1

30 Jul 2026, 10:52 UTC≈4,050 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/v0ToSaTQYd4?si=R5BCjKSZ7yh3xDFk Uploaded it again due to some issues in the previous version.

🔥53

30 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC≈3,560 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Here is the discussion video of my second essay. I will also share all papers strategy sessions gradually before 20th August. Also, will soon share whatever notes are left from Chemistry optional paper 1. That will complete all commitments from my side. Happy learning! ✨

8

28 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC≈3,690 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://youtu.be/tt-F5wGHLk8?si=-I1UUa4iuT-zF6GD I have shared my CSE 2025 Essay discussion video on YouTube so that it can help more aspirants, especially the ones who do not use Instagram. Do share it with your friends appearing this year as well. It is an honest reflection of what UPSC rewards in the essay paper. Happy learning! ✨

18

23 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC≈4,170 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

These are mostly Lovepreet sir’s notes with some additions from my side. I also referred to a pdf for f-block which I am unable to find. I downloaded it from Google itself. So you can refer to some additional source for topics not covered here. Also Coordination notes are quite lengthy. I’ll be sharing them in 3-4 pdfs for convenience.

3

23 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC≈4,440 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

I will be sharing Coordination Chemistry and f-block notes soon. That will complete Inorganic portion of paper 1. For Physical, I won’t be sharing any notes as I mainly relied on DIAS Notes and made additions in them. For Photochemistry and Surface Chemistry, I referred to Lovepreet sir’s notes selectively. That’s all about Chemistry optional. At last, I will be sharing my LAWS/DAWS notes from Rahul sir’s course, o

👍32

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @komal_mavi314. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UPSCfied with Komal Mavi, AIR 314 CSE'25” (@komal_mavi314), 5,566 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/komal_mavi314.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.