Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

With love, Sveta♡

@kolofay

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

960subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001685349549
TypeChannel
Username@kolofay
Created12 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kolofay

Growth

9606 Aug 2026, 13:51 — 960 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:55 — 960 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 13:516 Aug 2026, 14:55
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 959–961 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 14:55960no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:51960first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 18 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
128.1%
avg views ÷ 960 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,230
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held12 (18 January 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,460
Reactions total233
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,993 reactions across 12 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋28814.5%
custom 54093267889270372871527.63%
1517.58%
custom 52985944574976472551346.72%
custom 58595456662833768191306.52%
custom 52875047918098410731226.12%
💘1155.77%
custom 53574328165083529731075.37%
custom 53503101028742034221065.32%
custom 52152334157747625031035.17%
custom 53349739300063972391015.07%
custom 5289974294925819895914.57%
custom 5366414022621030140623.11%
custom 5285304024797561704472.36%
custom 5336946608485449914472.36%
custom 5370731108998607476462.31%
custom 5224338806571824823361.81%
custom 5312230042359581507361.81%
custom 5357372261764448801341.71%
custom 5251260511986663444301.51%
3 further kinds552.76%

Custom emoji. 17 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,993reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 12 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kolofay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 January 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC260 views88 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

🤩🤩🤩🤩❤️ ••• «Сага о грозах»🦋 Пробный образ, потом чуть переделаю❤️

custom 536641402262103014062custom 52737980393398128741311💘2

25 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC≈2,200 views145 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

🦋💗🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩💗🦋 ••• 😀«Водяная лилия» Образ красотки от меня😀

custom 528997429492581989591custom 525126051198666344430💘22💋2

3 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC804 views162 reactions4 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

23😀🩷

custom 5334973930006397239101custom 522433880657182482336💋187

6 Jun 2026, 15:56 UTC≈2,960 views143 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🍍💛 •••• ❝ Агата, ты девушка или дохлый бобёр?❞

custom 5215233415774762503103💋2512💘3

4 Jun 2026, 13:48 UTC963 views190 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

❤❤❤

custom 5287504791809841073122💋35custom 5377816301798442400249

4 Jun 2026, 06:37 UTC≈3,990 views168 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 5350310102874203422106custom 531223004235958150736💋197

2 Jun 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,040 views174 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

«Любовь Афродиты подобна вечному огню, всегда ярко горящему».🍁 •••• Афродита (Хизер)🎀 «Ярость Титанов»

custom 5357432816508352973107custom 533694660848544991447💘182

22 Feb 2026, 13:29 UTC≈1,730 views205 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

Лэйн существует повсюду🌙 •••• Закос на красотку🌹

custom 5859545666283376819130custom 537073110899860747646💋28💘1

9 Feb 2026, 07:47 UTC≈1,430 views70 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @AsakuraSanPhoto

Я в восторге сколько прекрасных поздравлений и подарочков от вас получила, даже в приложении КР 🫶вы у меня самые лучшие🥹 обняла всех и каждого 💕💕 Не могу не похвастаться шикарной открыткой меня, Дона и Хуана от Крис 🥹, чудесный букет и вкусняшка от Светы 🥹🫶, Эдит (пост выше) от Машуни 🥹 Я в слезах от умиления 😭

custom 528530402479756170447custom 535035568536212406118💘5

24 Jan 2026, 08:34 UTC≈1,590 views174 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

🤩Ведьма. Если исчезнешь, всем только лучше станет.🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩❤️

💋98custom 53573722617644488013429💘13

19 Jan 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,550 views214 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😘💋

custom 5298594457497647255134💘43💋2611

18 Jan 2026, 16:16 UTC≈7,830 views260 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

"- Вижу, у тебя проблемы с законом, красотка?"🎐 ••• Моя Адриана, "Пришествие №3"❤

custom 540932678892703728715263💋37💘8

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kolofay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 366,023 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“With love, Sveta♡” (@kolofay), 960 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kolofay.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.