Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -82. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 457–563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 04:18
469
-60
8 Sept 2026, 08:01
529
-6
29 Aug 2026, 21:14
535
-2
22 Aug 2026, 10:49
537
-8
15 Aug 2026, 07:47
545
-6
8 Aug 2026, 03:45
551
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:03
551
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 13 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
149 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
64
43.0%
🔥
24
16.1%
💯
11
7.38%
custom 5357104869985501985
10
6.71%
custom 5269690079214855071
7
4.70%
custom 5357314206691510112
7
4.70%
custom 5420471073713960073
7
4.70%
😁
7
4.70%
custom 5363886455842161794
5
3.36%
custom 5269436547295413549
3
2.01%
🙏
3
2.01%
custom 5269297274390866257
1
0.671%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
По тихонько к вам возвращаюсь мои хорошие.Очень соскучилась по вам❤️
Спасибо всем кто переживал за меня , интересовался куда я пропала , всё ли хорошо....)
Обо всём расскажу постепенно🌹
Невозможно создать новую реальность,
оставаясь в старой версии себя.
За эту неделю у меня было много созвонов, несколько энергетических сессий и почти каждая приходила с одним и тем же запросом 👇
-Хочу больше зарабатывать , но не понимаю в чем проблема!?
-Нет ресурса...
-Нет системы...
- устала сливать энергию
-много действий ,но денег в кассе 0
Ты можешь сколько угодно хотеть.
Можешь знать систему(ну или не знать)…
Возник затык.
“Не понимаю, в чём дело…”
Сейчас это состояние у многих экспертов.
И самое интересное–это не про то, что вы не умеете или не знаете!?
Вы уже всё умеете.
У вас уже были клиенты.
Деньги уже приходили.
Но сейчас это перестало работать.
И вопрос не в том:
почему раньше получалось?
А в том:
почему сейчас, делая то же самое — доход не растёт?
Я посмотрела ваши ответы в опросах.
И там очень чётко видно с…
Дорогая моя🖤
— выше оставила несколько опросов :
В каком состоянии ты сейчас живешь и работаешь?
Твоя текущая ситуация в доходе?
Откликается ли тебе это:
"Я многое знаю про продажи, но внутри напряжение"
Что тебе сейчас мешает расти больше всего?
Смотрю ответы… и уже вижу очень интересную картину
И, често, есть о чем поговорить!
Мне важно понять тебя глубже,
потому что на основе этих ответов
я разберу в следую…
The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Откликается ли тебе это:
"я многое знаю про продажи, но внутри напряжение"?
Да,это про меня33%
Иногда есть44%
Нет, у меня другое33%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤🔥3custom 54204710737139600731
Signed Мари | Лидер Женской Трансформации
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kolioglo_mary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Откликается ли тебе это:
"я многое знаю про продажи, но внутри напряжение"?
Да,это про меня33%
Иногда есть44%
Нет, у меня другое33%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 11 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мари🐦🔥” (@kolioglo_mary), 469 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kolioglo_mary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.