Channel
@kolegasdust
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001945789280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kolegasdust |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 16 May 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kolegasdust |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 11 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 11 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 May 2023 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Hello @telegram @durov I would like to convey that, there is no action that violates the terms and conditions of telegram here, I hope, telegram has a wise way,in managing problems, before doing strict action, such as banning/blocking a telegram channel, thank you.
Channel photo removed
.
γ € γ € πΎπUβππ πβ³π‘Τ γ € γ € π£πππ 6 β¬β¬ββ¬ββ¬β¬ βββ β¬β¬ββ¬ββ¬β¬ 01. ππ π πππππππ β¬ :: @ofcmorphic β¬ :: @ofcmorphicbot β¬ :: @psmorphicbot γ € κββ₯ REST 02. ππ π πππππ πππππππππππ β¬ :: @OFCLOWNIVERSE β¬ :: @OFCLOWNIVERS_BOT β¬ :: @MPPSCLOWN_BOT γ € κββ₯ REST 03. ππ π ππππ ππππππ β¬ :: @OFCINTFORENSE β¬ :: @Intforenseofficialbot β¬ :: @Intelps_bot γ € κββ₯ LIBUR 04. ππππππ πππ β¬ :: @OFCTRIGOZ β¬ :: @trigozbotβ¦
γ € γ € πΎπUβππ π»ππππ γ € γ € π£πππ 05 β¬β¬ββ¬ββ¬β¬ βββ β¬β¬ββ¬ββ¬β¬ 01. Event Organizer Roleplayer β¬ :: @EVORP β¬ :: @HrdevorpBot β¬ :: @Evocorp_bot γ € κββ₯ ACTIVE 02. NONGKI PROMOTE β¬ :: @NONGKIPROMOTE β¬ :: @NONGKIPMBOT β¬ :: @DETENDREBOT γ € κββ₯ ACTIVE ι.πub πnit β« :: SEXE PROMOTE β« :: @SEXEPM2 β₯ ACTIVE 03. πΆππͺ π©πΆπ³π πΉπ¨π¬π»π―π¬πΉπ΅ β¬ :: @OFCRAETHERN β¬ :: @bolfasisten_Bot β¬ :: @RAETHERNMPPS_BOT γ € κββ¦
Sticker, posted without a caption
γ € γ € πΎπUβππ π»ππππ γ € γ € π£πππ 04 β¬β¬ββ¬ββ¬β¬ βββ β¬β¬ββ¬ββ¬β¬ 01. πππππππππΰΌ β¬ :: @OFC_DEATHLESS β¬ :: @OFCDTS_BOT β¬ :: @DTSMPPSBOT γ € κββ₯ LIBUR ι.πub πnit β« ::πππππππππ β« ::@OFCDDANGEREUX β₯ REST 02. πγΏ. ππππ’π«ππ₯ β¬ :: @DEFOXERS β¬ :: @DEFOXEROFC_BOT β¬ :: @MPPSDEFOXER_BOT γ € κββ₯ ACTIVE 03. DARQIXOTE GANK β¬ :: @DARQIXOTE β¬ :: @Darqixote_bot β¬ :: @Drxtmpps_bot γ € κββ₯ ACTIVE 04. ππππππ πβ¦
Sticker, posted without a caption
γ € γ € πΎπUβππ π»ππππ γ € γ € π£πππ 03 β¬β¬ββ¬ββ¬β¬ βββ β¬β¬ββ¬ββ¬β¬ 01. πΕπ¨ππ¨ β¬ :: @JOUZUOFC β¬ :: @JOUZUOFC_BOT β¬ :: @JOUZUMPPS_BOT γ € κββ₯ REST 02. β¬ :: β¬ :: β¬ :: γ € κβ 03. CONJURING ACADEMY β¬ :: @CONJURINGACADEMY β¬ :: @Cahaunted_bot β¬ :: @CAPART_BOT γ € κββ₯ REST 04. NIFTY ORGANIZER β¬ :: @NIFTYORGANIZER β¬ :: @NIFTYORGANIZERBOT β¬ :: @NIFTYEOPSBOT γ € κββ₯ ACTIVE 05. OFC MORENO β¬ :: @OFCMORENβ¦
Sticker, posted without a caption
γ € γ € πΎπUβππ π»ππππ γ € γ € π£πππ 02 β¬β¬ββ¬ββ¬β¬ βββ β¬β¬ββ¬ββ¬β¬ 01.BLUEPRINT EVENT ORGANIZER β¬ :: @BLUEPRINTEO β¬ :: @BLUEPRINTOFFICEBOT β¬ :: @BPEOPATNERBOT γ € κββ₯ ACTIVE 02. π’πππππππ πππππ‘ππ¦ β¬ :: @OFCBAJINAS β¬ :: @bajinasofc_bot β¬ :: @bajinasmppsbot γ € κββ₯ ACTIVE 03. π’π©ππ₯ππππ β¬ :: @OVERKILLOFC β¬ :: @OVERKILLSROBOT β¬ :: @OVRKLROBOT γ € κββ₯ LIBUR 04. CΓRCULOS GEN-Z β¬ :: @CIRCULOSGZ β¬ :: @OfcAβ¦
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kolegasdust. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 931,668 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kolegasdust named 19 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππππ ππ πΎπUΜΈππ π»ππππβ (@kolegasdust), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kolegasdust.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.