Posted without readable text
🔥8🤡2❤1👍1

Channel
@kojournal
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,973subscribers
-132 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001474931332 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kojournal |
| Description | Аналитика. Новости. Экспертиза |
| Created | 24 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kojournal |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:18 | 7,973 | -4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:06 | 7,977 | -12 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:15 | 7,989 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 7,998 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 7,999 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:41 | 8,005 | -3 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 8,008 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 03:06 | 8,010 | -6 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 04:40 | 8,016 | -12 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 12:39 | 8,028 | -5 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 19:55 | 8,033 | -12 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 8,045 | -10 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 8,055 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 8,062 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 8,067 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:14 | 8,072 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 8,076 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 8,084 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 8,085 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 8,087 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (25 June 2026 – 1 November 2026) |
| Views total | 792 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 14:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
236 reactions across 25 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 67 | 28.4% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 16.1% | |
| ⚡ | 27 | 11.4% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 8.90% | |
| 👀 | 20 | 8.47% | |
| 😁 | 14 | 5.93% | |
| 🤔 | 14 | 5.93% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 2.54% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 2.12% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 1.69% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 1.69% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.69% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 1.27% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3 | 1.27% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.847% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.847% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.424% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.424% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjbvwBf9 | 1 | 14 August 2026 | 14 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 1 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Posted without readable text
🔥8🤡2❤1👍1
Volga: путешествие к истокам Ровно 16 лет назад, в октябре 2010 года с конвейера Горьковского автозавода сошла последняя «Волга», и казалось, что легендарная марка прекратила существование навсегда. Но сегодня на дорогах России вновь появились машины под именем этого бренда. Мы проехали на Volga K50 к истокам великой русской реки, чтобы вспомнить, с чего начиналась большая автоистория и оценить ее настоящее. Маршру…
👍4🔥3😁3😢2❤1
Кавминводы VS Сочи Эксперты все громче говорят о закате эры Сочи как главного магнита инвестиций в недвижимость. Кто придет на смену? По подсчетам ГК ССК, к концу III квартала 2026 года в Ессентуках, Пятигорске, Кисловодске и Железноводске продавалось 5104 лота жилья. Это больше, чем в Анапе (4579) и на Балтийском побережье (4072). До Сочи (5236) не хватает чуть больше сотни квартир. Главный аргумент для инвестора…
👍8🤔1🤯1
Отпуск, который работает HR-исследования подтверждают: сотрудники, преодолевшие выгорание, работают на 20% продуктивнее и почти на 60% реже берут больничный. Так что пауза в плотном графике — разумная необходимость. Вопрос лишь в том, как отдохнуть по-настоящему хорошо. Египет хорошо знаком российскому путешественнику, и именно это сегодня становится его преимуществом: прямой перелет из Москвы обычно занимает около…
👍7🔥4❤2👎2🥰2
21 августа FCongress при поддержке Forbes Woman соберет предпринимательниц и топ-менеджеров на закрытые сессии о лидерстве, карьере и деньгах. Бизнес-кэмп FCamp состоится в «Барвиха Luxury Village» в Московской области. Проект адресован предпринимательницам, руководительницам и женщинам, выстраивающим карьеру по собственным правилам; в этом году менторский день проводится во второй раз. Программа разделена на две ч…
🔥7😁3👍2⚡1❤1🍾1👀1🥰1
Важнейшие вопросы финансовой индустрии обсудят на МФФ-2026 Московский финансовый форум пройдет 21 сентября в Центральном выставочном зале «Манеж». В этом году встреча представителей власти, финансовых институтов, бизнеса и экспертного сообщества состоится в одиннадцатый раз. В центре обсуждения будут развитие финансовой системы России, перспективы долгового рынка, регулирование криптовалют и первые результаты работ…
👍5⚡2✍1👀1🤔1
Как конвертировать городскую историю в бизнес-капитал В Твери стартовала публичная программа проекта «Твериум», который переосмысляет наследие города XIX века с помощью современных форматов. За один день организаторы провели дискуссию о культурном предпринимательстве, пресс-тур по ярким местам притяжения с историческим флером и «Глуповское чаепитие» в музее Михаила Салтыкова-Щедрина. Представители бизнеса и креати…
👍5⚡2👏1
🎞Лето в режиме суперзум Отпуск сегодня подразумевает съемку документального кино: не выложил отпускные достижения, как будто и не отдыхал. 35% россиян считают важным выкладывать фото и видео из путешествий, для 9% — это первостепенно. Согласно глобальному исследованию, ради эффектного кадра 26% путешественников игнорировали ограждения и запреты, а 22% подвергали себя опасности. Перед публикацией 28% обычно редакт…
❤7👍3😁3⚡1🍾1
«Чего-то хотелось: не то конституции, не то севрюжины с хреном…» 30 июля в Твери можно будет окунуться в мир Салтыкова-Щедрина. Писатель не только создавал едкие сатиры, но и в 1860–1862 годах служил тверским вице-губернатором. Считается, что именно местные впечатления помогли ему придумать собирательный образ города Глупова. К 200-летию со дня рождения писателя в его доме на Рыбацкой улице пройдет званый вечер «Г…
🔥6👍5⚡1🍾1🥰1
🚀 Космос по-русски и по-китайски: две модели одной мечты 14 июля с Байконура взлетел «Союз МС-29» — первый пилотируемый старт года и живой символ российской космонавтики, в которой ставка на госконтроль и технологическое наследие. Но пока «Союз» набирал высоту, на земле развернулся новый виток космической гонки. За несколько дней до старта Россия и Китай сделали два показательных хода. Москва опубликовала проект Ос…
👍4⚡3👀3👏2✍1
💵 В любой непонятной ситуации покупай доллар На фоне падающих ставок по вкладам старая финансовая стратегия снова выходит на первый план. По данным Индекса Банки.ру (более 24 млн пользователей), спрос на валютные операции во II квартале вырос почти втрое к началу года. Лидер по-прежнему один — доллар: на него пришлось 68% заявок, максимум за пять кварталов. Евро (22%) и юань (7%) покупают заметно реже. А вот интер…
😁4🤔3❤2👀1
🧬 В России заработал «конвейер» персонализированных мРНК-вакцин против рака Событие, которое ещё вчера казалось научной фантастикой, стало клинической реальностью. В апреле 2026 года в НМИЦ радиологии 60-летний пациент из Курской области первым получил дозу персонализированной мРНК-вакцины «Неоонковак» для лечения меланомы кожи. Препарат создан совместно Центром им. Гамалеи, НМИЦ радиологии и онкоцентром им. Блохин…
🔥8👍6👏3❤2⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @kojournal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Журнал «Компания»” (@kojournal), 7,973 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kojournal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.