Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Koisekki

@koisekk1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,691subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002045704255
TypeChannel
Username@koisekk1
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/koisekk1

Growth

1,6911,7061,698.56 August 2026 — 1,706 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,699 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,695 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,691 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,689–1,708 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:161,691-4
10 Aug 2026, 09:471,695-4
7 Aug 2026, 18:571,699-7
6 Aug 2026, 19:491,706first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 7 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4,013 reactions across 17 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,44235.9%
🔥84121.0%
❤‍🔥52613.1%
🥰3508.72%
💘2686.68%
👍1804.49%
🍓1423.54%
💋1132.82%
😁711.77%
🤯220.548%
👀180.449%
🦄80.199%
💯70.174%
50.125%
💔50.125%
😢30.075%
🙈30.075%
20.05%
🆒20.05%
🌭20.05%
3 further kinds30.075%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,013reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 13 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
118
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 17 we hold a reading for · 94%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @koisekk1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 January 2026 to 13 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Mar 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,480 views189 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Только скетчи Swear to god если бы у меня был прокриейт- это была бы цветная картинка, но работа градиентных карт в клипе для меня что-то сверх человеческого понимания

125❤‍🔥40🔥18💋5💘1

3 Mar 2026, 10:53 UTC≈2,070 views152 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

yuh

96💋29🥰14❤‍🔥8🍓2💘1🔥1🆒1

25 Feb 2026, 12:41 UTC≈2,010 views186 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Обнаружила новый способ получения дофамина - прорабатывать глаза текстурной кистью, а не просто цветом 🤩

131❤‍🔥28👍15🔥5🍓4💘2💋1

20 Feb 2026, 09:37 UTC≈2,010 views199 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤗 Еще один заказик, обязательно сяду делать спец форму для комишек со всеми ценами примерами и остальным необходимым Обязательно..

134🍓39🔥16❤‍🔥6💋2💘1🆒1

19 Feb 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,540 views160 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Как только вижу в сериях число 993 (093), в голове возникают тысячи фан-артов JDH 🤩

🔥10733🥰15❤‍🔥2🤯2🍓1

17 Feb 2026, 19:56 UTC≈1,860 views179 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Это были жесткие недельки. Показываю свои работы- оформление дискорда. Еще чуть чуть и будет готов старт для раздевашек 😤 В комментариях будет шакальный баннер, если очень интересно

124👍24🥰18❤‍🔥7🍓4🌭2

29 Jan 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,430 views234 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👧

👍14152🤯20🍓6❤‍🔥5💘5🔥3🐳1

28 Jan 2026, 10:52 UTC≈2,030 views93 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Давайте я облегчу вам выбор, решайте 👀 Если выбираете форсакен, то выберите ещё +1 вариант обязательно! Т.к я не очень шарю в фд

  1. Лололошк76%
  2. Магическая битва20%
  3. Форсакен (выберите еще вариант)19%
  4. Геншин36%
  5. Хонкай25%
  6. Валорант5%
  7. Лига легенд9%

The shares total 190%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

💘58👀16🦄8💔53❤‍🔥2🤝1

28 Jan 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,710 views102 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

😇 быстро скажите мне с каким фд и персонажами сделать игральные карты. Под конец апреля разыграю 5-10 колод среди вас, папищики

😁7116🔥9❤‍🔥6

27 Jan 2026, 12:44 UTC≈2,060 views259 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Погрустите тут Вспомнила о персонажах. Когда-нибудь хватит сил написать рассказ по ним, хотя бы небольшой

💘172🔥39❤‍🔥334🍓3💯3😢3👀2

23 Jan 2026, 11:07 UTC≈2,400 views279 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вы НУ ОЧЕНЬ жоско наактивничали на прошлом посте 😳 Может какую нибудь раздевашку сделать, в пейринге рыбки с ло? Сразу двоих разденем 🤩 Спасибо всем большое за репосты и звездочки, вы правда лучшие ❤️

176🍓54💋33🥰6❤‍🔥4💘2🔥2💯1

22 Jan 2026, 13:36 UTC≈14,200 views859 reactions23 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Наконец доковыряла красивую рыбку из сезона, в комментариях будет файл для аватарки, если кому нужно Буду очень рада репостам ☺️ Нагло взяла референс у замечательного художника Если будет много актива, наскетчу вам много взрослого контента с ним 😇

🔥522❤‍🔥172124🍓11💋9💘9🥰74

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @koisekk1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jan 2026, 10:52 UTCFinal Results346 voters

Давайте я облегчу вам выбор, решайте 👀 Если выбираете форсакен, то выберите ещё +1 вариант обязательно! Т.к я не очень шарю в фд

  1. Лололошк76%
  2. Магическая битва20%
  3. Форсакен (выберите еще вариант)19%
  4. Геншин36%
  5. Хонкай25%
  6. Валорант5%
  7. Лига легенд9%

The shares total 190%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 13 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,204,905 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Koisekki” (@koisekk1), 1,691 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/koisekk1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.