Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КОД | ИИ в работе

Channel

КОД | ИИ в работе

@kodjournal

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,510subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 1 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003786066946
TypeChannel
Username@kodjournal
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 October 2026
Last confirmed live27 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/kodjournal

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

1,5011,5511,5261 October 2026 — 1,511 subscribers6 October 2026 — 1,516 subscribers12 October 2026 — 1,501 subscribers15 October 2026 — 1,540 subscribers18 October 2026 — 1,551 subscribers21 October 2026 — 1,540 subscribers24 October 2026 — 1,526 subscribers27 October 2026 — 1,510 subscribers1,5101 October 202627 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 26 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,494–1,559 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Oct 2026, 17:061,510-16
24 Oct 2026, 16:451,526-14
21 Oct 2026, 19:301,540-11
18 Oct 2026, 20:401,551+11
15 Oct 2026, 11:281,540+39
12 Oct 2026, 14:171,501-15
6 Oct 2026, 04:421,516+5
1 Oct 2026, 18:221,511first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.28%
avg views ÷ 1,510 subscribers
Avg views / post
140
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held20 (25 September 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total1,401
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Oct 2026, 18:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1322.0%
👍1220.3%
👀813.6%
🤔610.2%
💯58.47%
❤46.78%
🤯35.08%
✍23.39%
👏23.39%
👻23.39%
👨‍💻11.69%
🥰11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2026, 16:01 UTC50 views4 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Письмо клиенту из заметок после встречи После встречи остаются обрывки в заметках или голосовое на пару минут. Письмо по ним обычно пишется вечером, когда детали уже стёрлись, а цифры приходится вспоминать. Промпт ниже собирает письмо из сырых заметок: договорённости списком с исполнителем и сроком, цифры без изменений, в конце следующий шаг. Всё, чего в заметках нет, он не выдумывает, а выносит в отдельный блок «У…

🤔2🔥1🤯1

1 Oct 2026, 13:02 UTC72 views2 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Нейросеть советует компании по чужим подборкам: так устроено 62% ответов 30 сентября на Хабре вышел разбор Сергея Бурого: откуда ChatGPT, «Алиса AI», Perplexity, Claude и GigaChat берут списки «лучших компаний». Он собрал 368 ответов на 56 вопросов по 32 проектам: бухгалтерия, маркетплейсы, фулфилмент, франшизы. В 208 ответах были ссылки на источники, всего 1221 ссылка. В 130 ответах из 208, это 62%, среди источнико…

👀1👏1

1 Oct 2026, 10:46 UTC109 views1 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Проверил Claude на договоре купли-продажи квартиры: 8 ловушек из 8 и одна сверх плана Взял типовой договор на квартиру в Москве за 9 млн рублей и спрятал в нём 8 проблем, на которых покупатели теряют деньги. Отдал Claude с одной просьбой: проверить со стороны покупателя и расставить риски по важности. Нашёл все восемь: расчёт наличными до регистрации при залоге у банка, «иные расчёты вне договора», нет согласия суп…

🔥1

1 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC109 views2 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Gemini 4 Argon: уровень GPT-6 Astra и втрое меньше выдумок Google 30 сентября показала Gemini 4 Argon. В независимом рейтинге Artificial Analysis у неё 53 балла, столько же, сколько у GPT-6 Astra. Прогон одной задачи рейтинга стоит $1,99, у Astra $3,26. Для работы важнее другая цифра. Доля уверенных ошибок, когда модель выдумывает ответ вместо «не знаю», у Argon 15%. У GPT-6 Astra 51%, у GPT-6.1 Sol 54%. От неё зав…

🤔2

30 Sept 2026, 16:41 UTC161 views4 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Промпт для ответа на неприятное письмо Клиент пишет на эмоциях, и хочется ответить так же. Этот промпт сначала разбирает претензию, потом пишет спокойный ответ: Мне пришло неприятное письмо. Помоги ответить. 1. Коротко: чего хочет автор, что в претензии справедливо, а что нет. 2. Ответ: спокойно, вежливо, без оправданий и канцелярита. Признай, в чём мы неправы, остальное изложи фактами. Предложи следующий шаг с дат…

👍3💯1

30 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC149 views4 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Ваш голос за 10 секунд: вышла ElevenLabs v4. Промпт для сценария внутри 28 сентября ElevenLabs выпустила модели озвучки Eleven v4 и v4 Turbo. Чтобы клонировать голос, теперь хватает 10 секунд записи. Языков больше 90, эмоции задаются тегами прямо в тексте: [laughs], [said angrily]. Turbo рассчитана на голосовых ассистентов: по данным компании, первая фраза звучит через 150 мс. В слепом тесте ElevenLabs около 75% сл…

❤2👍1🔥1

30 Sept 2026, 10:02 UTC170 views11 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Сколько я плачу за нейросети: было 26 долларов, стало 106 Этот пост я начинал писать про 26 долларов в месяц. Пока писал, перешёл на Claude за 100. Так что считаю заново. Claude Max, 100 долларов. Я сначала обрадовался «безлимиту», но нет: лимитов просто в 5 раз больше, чем на тарифе за 20. Это мой основной инструмент: сайт, аналитика, презентации, утренняя редакция каналов, а теперь ещё публикации в семи соцсетях.…

👀5🔥4👍1🤯1

30 Sept 2026, 07:40 UTC173 views3 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Уровень платного Opus теперь бесплатно в Claude Anthropic открыла Sonnet 5.5 без подписки: в рабочих задачах 1844 балла против 1846 у Opus 5.5. В бесплатном ChatGPT только младшие модели Luna. В России Claude официально не работает, данные клиентов перед загрузкой обезличьте. Проверьте на договоре или КП: Ты юрист и редактор деловых документов. Проверь документ ниже по шагам: 1. Двусмысленные формулировки («разумны…

🔥2👍1

29 Sept 2026, 16:06 UTC199 views4 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

5 минут, и нейросеть находит в базе клиентов тех, кому пора позвонить Выгрузите базу в Excel, замените ФИО, телефоны, почту и адреса номером строки: передавать персональные данные в зарубежный сервис без согласия клиентов нельзя по 152-ФЗ. Загрузите файл в ChatGPT или Claude с промптом: Это выгрузка моей базы клиентов, персональные данные заменены номером строки. 1. Найди 15 клиентов, с кем стоит связаться первыми:…

✍2👨‍💻1💯1

29 Sept 2026, 07:39 UTC209 views5 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

ИИ-пересказ теряет детали, а вы запоминаете пересказ Исследователи Джорджтаунского и Вашингтонского университетов проверили, как ИИ-сводки влияют на память. Участники смотрели видео с дорожным происшествием, читали пересказ от нейросети, точный или с ошибками, и потом вспоминали, что видели. Статья вышла на arXiv 23 сентября. Чаще всего сводки ошибались пропуском важных деталей. Те, кто читал неточный пересказ, зам…

💯3🤔2

28 Sept 2026, 16:16 UTC222 viewsread 1 October 2026
Poll

Для чего вы уже используете ИИ в работе? Итоги покажу в пятницу

  1. Тексты, письма, посты42%
  2. Таблицы и аналитика38%
  3. Картинки и видео27%
  4. Документы и договоры21%
  5. Автоматизация и код60%
  6. Пока не использую8%

The shares total 196%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Sept 2026, 10:01 UTC241 views3 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Голосовое клиента превращаем в бриф Клиент наговорил голосовое, где всё вперемешку. Расшифруйте его (кнопка под голосовым в Telegram Premium) и отдайте нейросети с промптом: Ниже расшифровка голосового от клиента. Составь бриф: 1. Что клиент хочет, одним предложением. 2. Требования с цифрами: бюджет, сроки, площадь, параметры. 3. Пожелания без цифр. 4. Чего не хватает, чтобы начать работу: вопросы клиенту. 5. Проти…

🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kodjournal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Sept 2026, 16:16 UTCAnonymous Poll48 voters

Для чего вы уже используете ИИ в работе? Итоги покажу в пятницу

  1. Тексты, письма, посты42%
  2. Таблицы и аналитика38%
  3. Картинки и видео27%
  4. Документы и договоры21%
  5. Автоматизация и код60%
  6. Пока не использую8%

The shares total 196%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2026 to 1 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КОД | ИИ в работе” (@kodjournal), 1,510 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kodjournal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.