Channel
@knizhnost
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,852subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001423499139 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @knizhnost |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/knizhnost |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 1,852 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 1,854 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:21 | 1,855 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 1,857 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 1,856 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 30 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
121 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 29 | 24.0% | |
| custom 5415753820938458376 | 24 | 19.8% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 10.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 10.7% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 4.96% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.31% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 3.31% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 3.31% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 3.31% | |
| 🎃 | 3 | 2.48% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 2.48% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.826% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2025 to 1 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @knizhnost. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 October 2025 to 1 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Враг мой» («Enemy Mine») Барри Лонгиер, 1979г. При мысли об аде мне стало смешно. Ведь ад рисуется нам этаким пожаром под управлением зубоскала-садиста, облаченного в форму пожарника. На Файрине-4 я твердо усвоил другое: ад это одиночество, голод и нескончаемые холода. Необитаемый остров на неизведанной планете Файрин-4, одна катапультируемая капсула и двое врагов — человек и драконианин. Представители рас, чья во…
🔥12
«Враг мой» Барри Лонгиер
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Гомер, 1537 год: почти 500 лет истории. Это латинский перевод «Илиады» Гомера изданный в Венеции в 1537 году. Титульный лист: Потрясающая ксилографическая рамка с колоннами и аллегорическими фигурами. Внизу — издательский знак с путти, поддерживающими щит. Корешок: Оригинальное классическое тиснение с названием и датой MDXXXVII римскими цифрами. Девиз: На последнем фото девиз «SVSTINE ET ABSTINE» (Терпи и воздерж…
❤4👏3🤩3🔥2custom 54157538209384583762
«Братишка» Айзек Азимов
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«Братишка» («Kid Brother») Айзек Азимов, 1990г. Рассказ «Братишка» сначала кажется почти бытовым. Немного раздражающий голос, немного усталый и не очень приятный человек, который оправдывается — то ли перед судом, то ли перед самим собой. И ты даже не сразу понимаешь от чего именно становится не по себе. Он говорит много. Слишком много. Сбивается, злится, но продолжает рассказывать свою историю... Однажды его жена…
💔4🤯4custom 54157538209384583762
В старинном букинистическом магазине найден Некрономикон! Вчера в одном из подвалов Праги нашлась та самая книга — «Некрономикон» безумного поэта Абдула Альхазреда. Что известно о находке: • Книга датирована примерно 1450 годом • Переплёт из... странной кожи (экспертиза ещё продолжается ) • Текст на арабском с вставками на неизвестном языке Самое интересное: При попытке прочитать вслух первую главу у главного корр…
😁13🔥8😱4custom 54157538209384583764👍2
«Магия» Леонид Каганов
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«Магия» Леонид Каганов, 2010 г. А знаешь, что случилось потом? — Знаю. Великий Энди Патрик подарил людям магию. — Да, американский программист Энди Патрик опубликовал в интернете обряд, с помощью которого можно убить любого человека, где бы он ни находился, зная только его имя, место рождения, номер паспорта или водительского удостоверения или номер ИНН. А если это все неизвестно, то хотя бы лицо. Мир, в котором у к…
❤🔥3🔥3custom 54157538209384583762
«На посошок» Стивен Кинг
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«На посошок» («One for the Road») Стивен Кинг, 1977г. Ветер, вот чего я не любил, его пронзительный вой, в котором слышались ненависть, боль и страх всего мира. Ветер нес смерть, белую смерть, а может, что-то и пострашнее смерти. От этих завываний становилось не по себе даже в теплой постели, с закрытыми ставнями и запертыми дверьми. А уж на дороге они просто сводили с ума. Тем более на дороге в Джерусалемс-Лот. Сн…
❤🔥7❤2custom 54157538209384583762👍1
«Мы вам все припомним» Филип Дик
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«Мы вам всё припомним»/«Из глубин памяти» («We Can Remember It for You Wholesale») Филип Дик, 1966г. — Не беспокойтесь, вы будете уверены, что побывали там. Вы не запомните меня, не запомните свой визит. Но мы гарантируем, что для вас это будет самое настоящее путешествие. Дуглас Куэйл — обычный клерк, мечтающий побывать на Марсе. Заядлая работа, обыденная жизнь, жена относится к нему, как к ничтожеству... Куэйл по…
custom 54157538209384583767🔥4👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @knizhnost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
«Враг мой» Барри Лонгиер
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«Братишка» Айзек Азимов
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«Магия» Леонид Каганов
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«На посошок» Стивен Кинг
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«Мы вам все припомним» Филип Дик
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
«Поколение, достигшее цели» Клиффорд Саймак
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2025 to 1 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,336,090 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Книжный уют” (@knizhnost), 1,852 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/knizhnost.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.