Channel
@klyz017
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
859subscribers
+26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003587645267 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @klyz017 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/klyz017 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 859 | +24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 835 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 833 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 833 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (21 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 386 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
藤宮ゆかり - 原來妳什麼都不想要！排斥任何人設的寶塚女子！#藤宫ゆかり #FFT-012 在暗黑界名声与流量即是一切，为了销售，女优最怕人家不认识自己，尤其是人妻系的女优几乎每个人设都吃很重，因此片商在为新人量身订造背景时，都会有多夸张就多夸张！但是有没有例外呢？答案还真有～这个月登场的藤宫ゆかり(藤宫由香里)就是，在商谈拍摄作品时她便与片商约法三章，给出了三不原则！一是不可以过问她的私生活、二是不可以问她的老公身分、三是不可以提到她小孩的事，以上三点都做到才会答应拍摄，不然就拉倒走人～ 这一位诱人的顶级新秀何许人也？她是在“Prestige”集团下的人妻片商“KANBi”出道的“藤宫ゆかり(藤宫由香里)”，一般看到这样的新人，我们多半会先看看片商做了什么人设ー她有什么身分、为什么要背著老公来拍 AV、私底下有什么不为人知的特异功能⋯尽管有些故事写得平易近人、有些则是一看就是胡说八道，但至少这是唯一能让我们了解这位女优的途径…
里宮れん - 北之雪地孕育的黃金Body！脫掉雪衣的她色氣沖天！#里宫れん #MIFD-487 注意看！是本格派尤物！本番这位女优名叫“里宫れん(里宫莲)”，而先来看看“信州育ちの美白 G カップ巨乳（信州孕育的美白 G 罩杯巨乳)”这头衔，首先信州是哪儿呢？就是曾经举办过冬季奥运的长野县，每年寒假总有许多观光客会去那儿滑雪，所以～这位新人不只拥有波涛汹涌的 G CUP 豪乳、还是一位不折不扣的Skier(滑雪玩家)！ 这也是为什么在剧照中她总是穿著雪衣雪裤被男优关照，而令笔者没想到的是原来滑雪装也有凸显身材的效果，看到剧照和试看影片中里宫れん那紧身裤因为过紧，而透出内裤的画面只能说羞耻度 Max，色情又养眼，所以天气冷无所谓，只要下面是热的就行了～进了房间的男优猴急地把里宫れん(里宫莲)扒个精光，接著忍不住发出了赞叹的尖叫声ー是“ナイスな黄金比ボディ”(Nice 的黄金比 Body)！
雛乃ゆな - Z世代究極水蛇腰！能復刻伊藤舞雪的輝煌之路嗎？#雏乃ゆな #fsdss-804 真相大白了！ 有在追女优社群的朋友，一定注意到市场上有几个以不露脸的方式提前启动宣传的女优，上月这位隶属于事务所“LINX”的“雏乃ゆな(雏乃由奈)”就是其中之一！她表示，自己将会在愚人节的 4 月 1 日情报中解禁，所以～所以除非是记错了，那她就不会是片商“Moodyz”那一挂的(因为 4 月 1 日是星期一，那些片商则是隔一天(星期二)才发表工作清单)的。
❤1
北岡果林 - 強大光環藏不住！她曾是人氣少女雜誌模特兒！#北冈果林 #IPZZ-285 这位浑身上下散发出浓厚贵族气息的女优叫作北冈果林，她是在今年 4 月号档期中于“Ideapocket”旗下登场的专属新人之一，根据アイポケ(IP 社)所述，北冈果林目前还是一名大学生，就读名校的她不只外型出众而且喜欢性爱，尤其她对欧吉桑的技巧更是念念不忘！是个独钟大叔的妹子，如此开门见山的开场，相信资深影迷在看到这边后就会明白，片商此时不是在铺梗，而是直接召唤了他出来，在这一行讲到技巧好的欧吉桑那就只有一位大大，那就是ー魔舌鬼手怪体位，吉村卓！ 又是 4K 高画质、又是吉村卓助阵，不难看出“IP 社”对北冈果林的期望，认为最优质、最可爱的妹子就要用最𫫇、最变态的欧吉桑来弄；要知道北冈果林是才刚出道的新人，能够初次上阵就与吉村卓这纵横沙场多年的老将搏斗，绝对算是高规格待遇！
大槻 ゆりか - 為性教育犧牲奉獻，發揚大愛精神！#大槻ゆりか #MIFD-481 古有“佛祖割肉喂鹰，今有护理师舍身下海”！眼镜加白袍，这位名叫“大槻ゆりか(大槻百合香)”的保健室姊姊，正是在片商“Moodyz”出道的新人，她的身份是在中学保健室上班的护理师，虽然拥有丰富的性知识但却很可惜只是纸上谈兵～因为在下海拍 AV 之前她居然只有一次性经验，每当碰到正处于青春期的学生来请教性爱方面的问题时，即使最终都能顺利解答所有问题，但她不免会感到心虚、犹疑⋯ ，所以大槻ゆりか(大槻百合香)决定了，她要投身暗黑界来增加实战经验！日后才能造福更多尚未性启蒙的学子们～
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @klyz017. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 917,252 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💋车牌|AV 影评|番号大全” (@klyz017), 859 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/klyz017.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.