Video message, posted without a caption
💋58❤32💘19🔥10❤🔥4

Channel
@klocals
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,949subscribers
+49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001966325558 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @klocals |
| Description | K:LOCALS — ваш проводник по корейской сцене в России, объединяющий артистов и фанатов. наши соц.сети: https://taplink.cc/k.locals поддержка: @LocalsHelp |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/klocals |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 6,949 | +50 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 6,899 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 6,900 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (3 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 45,448 |
| Reactions total | 3,533 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,533 reactions across 24 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,699 | 48.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 555 | 15.7% | |
| custom 5272022371010636661 | 305 | 8.63% | |
| 💋 | 260 | 7.36% | |
| 🔥 | 239 | 6.76% | |
| 💘 | 135 | 3.82% | |
| 🤩 | 86 | 2.43% | |
| 💔 | 65 | 1.84% | |
| 🤣 | 56 | 1.59% | |
| 🥰 | 54 | 1.53% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 0.594% | |
| 🆒 | 17 | 0.481% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 0.425% | |
| 👻 | 8 | 0.226% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 0.226% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 0.113% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.085% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.057% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.028% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,533reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
💋58❤32💘19🔥10❤🔥4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤85🔥38💋22❤🔥14
NEW TIMING | BEWHY TOUR | ТЮМЕНЬ * PLATINUM & GOLD - построение очереди не раннее 15:00 16:00 - запуск PLATINUM 16:25 - начало ивента Q&A 16:25 - запуск GOLD 17:00 - начало ивента Soundcheck * SILVER - построение очереди не раннее 16:30 17:00 - запуск SILVER 17:30 - начало ивента Group-Photo ——— 18:00 - открытие дверей для всех категорий 19:00 - начало шоу
❤35
Концерт сегодня!🎵 🎵Тюмень, это тот самый вечер, которого вы ждали! Берите с собой друзей, хорошее настроение и готовьтесь отрываться по полной. Забирайте последние билеты на сайте! K:LOCALS
❤48❤🔥18💋16💘11
Омск! Огромное вам спасибо за то, что пришли на мой концерт. Я был очень тронут тем, что от самого начала и до самого конца вы ни на секунду не переставали кричать, поддерживать меня и дарить свою энергию. Этот день в Омске стал для меня по-настоящему особенным и значимым. Вы умеете отрываться… как всегда!!! 🔥 Your energy today was so avangard. 😎 Спасибо вам от всего сердца! ❤️
❤86❤🔥37🔥22🎉4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤98❤🔥49custom 527202237101063666131💋17🔥2
Омск, встреча с BewhY уже сегодня! 💫 🤩Все готово, артист с нетерпением ждем встречи! Вы готовы разделить этот вечер с нами? Забирайте последние билеты на нашем сайте! K:LOCALS
❤🔥60custom 527202237101063666130❤21💘11
Релиз дня! ✨ Совсем недавно у российского музыкального продюсера omgzanoza вышел альбом «hi», в котором есть совместный трек с vangdale - «the dirt». Особенно радует, что корейские исполнители и русские продюсеры делают треки вместе и поддерживают коннект! K:LOCALS
🤣48💘27❤19🤬8👻6custom 52720223710106366614💋2
NEW TIMING | BEWHY TOUR | ОМСК * PLATINUM & GOLD - построение очереди не раннее 15:00 16:00 - запуск PLATINUM 16:25 - начало ивента Q&A 16:25 - запуск GOLD 17:00 - начало ивента Soundcheck * SILVER - построение очереди не раннее 16:30 17:00 - запуск SILVER 17:30 - начало ивента Group-Photo ——— 18:00 - открытие дверей для всех категорий 19:00 - начало шоу
❤31custom 527202237101063666116💘15❤🔥1🔥1
Новосибирск и Томск — было круто!🩶 ✨ Два полных зала, два незабываемых вечера и огромное количество эмоций. Благодарим каждого, кто был с нами. Тур в продолжается — впереди Омск! K:LOCALS
❤101🔥58💘22👍13custom 52720223710106366615👏2🤩1
Томск. До встречи с вами я не знал, каким воспоминанием этот город останется для меня. Но теперь, как и другие города, Томск, кажется, останется в моём сердце по-настоящему особенным местом. Я слышал, что и в Томске были фанаты, которые из-за плохого самочувствия не смогли посмотреть концерт. Мне очень жаль, и я искренне переживаю за вас. Я буду молиться за вас здесь и очень надеюсь, что мы обязательно встретимся с…
❤101💋34custom 527202237101063666127
Новосибирск. Нам было действительно очень жарко, правда? Думаю, это был самый жаркий концерт из всех, что я когда-либо давал. Ваша энергия была невероятно горячей, и сам зал тоже был настолько жарким, что, честно говоря, мне даже было трудно дышать. Я до сих пор не понимаю, как вы всё это выдержали. Огромное вам спасибо. Я слышал, что в тот день кому-то стало плохо и человек даже потерял сознание. Мне от этого оч…
❤87custom 527202237101063666146🔥28❤🔥10💘4🥰3🙏3💋2
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @klocals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 81,081 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“K:LOCALS” (@klocals), 6,949 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/klocals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.