sempet aku reset dan coba login ke no itu cuma ini aku malah delete
Channel
klarifikasi @elbiyyu
@klarifbiyya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002396461445 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @klarifbiyya |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 24 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/klarifbiyya |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 1 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 24 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 72
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
di hapus dong akun ini
klarifikasi @elbiyyu pinned «aku lama dia @pohwan @lumaps @MeNntari nomor bonus + usn baru dari dia : +6285183559542 + @memezkk ch pay nya : @pindjai ch dia & ch rekbernya : @siklusm & @rekber_bungsu testie' asli saya yang ada di @mirivp di ganti sama dia jadi https://t.me/sikLuGs…»
tai mau tai?
ini yaa akun nya di ganti lagi aja sama dia
WKWK GABISA BUAT FORMAT ARSIP SENDIRI YA SAY? SAMPE PAKE YANG GUA BUAT
untuk kalian yang perna order di akun acyla acyla ga nipu samsek ya dia itu pake akun tsb buat nipu pls nangis berat.. di ganti jadi " anna" sama dia
aku lama dia @pohwan @lumaps @MeNntari nomor bonus + usn baru dari dia : +6285183559542 + @memezkk ch pay nya : @pindjai ch dia & ch rekbernya : @siklusm & @rekber_bungsu testie' asli saya yang ada di @mirivp di ganti sama dia jadi https://t.me/sikLuGs nama testie dulu nya proofbiyya & @lbiyyastore sekarang store-nya di ganti sama yang beli ch saya jadi rekber @rekber_bungsu ini sama dia
WKWKK KURANG PUAS SEBENERNYA SI
klarifikasi @elbiyyu pinned «jadi disini bukan saya yang menipu yaa saya pun gatau apa' yang hanya saya tau dia membeli ch dan testie saya karena saya hiatus dan dapet kabar seperti itu. bukti' pun sudah jelas di mana mana untuk kalian harus lebih hati hati lagi dalam berjual atau membeli…»
jadi disini bukan saya yang menipu yaa saya pun gatau apa' yang hanya saya tau dia membeli ch dan testie saya karena saya hiatus dan dapet kabar seperti itu. bukti' pun sudah jelas di mana mana untuk kalian harus lebih hati hati lagi dalam berjual atau membeli karena jaman sekarang orang semakin membutuhkan uang bakal lebih licik permainan atau penjualan mereka, bisa saja dengan cara baik mereka merayu kalo mereka …
klarifikasi @elbiyyu pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @klarifbiyya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 589,882 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 6
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 6
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@klarifbiyya named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
named in 1 post, 16 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“klarifikasi @elbiyyu” (@klarifbiyya), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/klarifbiyya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.