Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 路易访谈(交流大群)金富德州

Supergroup

路易访谈(交流大群)金富德州

@kkkkk

Has discussion group2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

1,744members

-175 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

286 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003638988591
TypeSupergroup
Usernames@duboou @kkkkk
Description路易访谈 时事资讯,快速阅览! 在这里,你可以快速获取最新的时事资讯和深度分析,了解全球热点、社会动态与趋势变化。通过我们的频道,您不仅能与志同道合的人一起交流,还能参与多样化的视讯活动。 📌 关注路易,精彩不断 🎤 人生路易,分享你的成长与见解 💬 交流大群 @kkkkk(五条k) 🎥 视讯频道 @kkkkkk(六条k)
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 September 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held14
On Telegramt.me/kkkkk

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,7441,9191,831.57 August 2026 — 1,919 members8 August 2026 — 1,917 members11 August 2026 — 1,909 members14 August 2026 — 1,905 members17 August 2026 — 1,897 members20 August 2026 — 1,894 members24 August 2026 — 1,885 members27 August 2026 — 1,876 members30 August 2026 — 1,868 members2 September 2026 — 1,861 members6 September 2026 — 1,777 members11 September 2026 — 1,753 members15 September 2026 — 1,744 members24 September 2026 — 1,744 members7 August 202624 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 48 days, net -175. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,718–1,945 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
24 Sept 2026, 02:151,744no change
15 Sept 2026, 18:011,744-9
11 Sept 2026, 19:581,753-24
6 Sept 2026, 22:401,777-84
2 Sept 2026, 15:101,861-7
30 Aug 2026, 18:581,868-8
27 Aug 2026, 15:391,876-9
24 Aug 2026, 13:331,885-9
20 Aug 2026, 11:421,894-3
17 Aug 2026, 13:271,897-8
14 Aug 2026, 09:351,905-4
11 Aug 2026, 05:431,909-8
8 Aug 2026, 01:421,917-2
7 Aug 2026, 04:001,919first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“路易访谈(交流大群)金富德州” (@kkkkk), 1,744 members as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kkkkk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.