ребята сюда, купил митку и танцпол на илью, оч рад 😁
❤7custom 53372977993713037814💋3custom 53708632823221535421

Channel
@kkediaa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001904959305 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kkediaa |
| Description | ЛС: @maumesai тв/кв ставлю по желанию. |
| Created | 11 August 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kkediaa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 37 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 37 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 2 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
160 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 41 | 25.6% | |
| 💋 | 29 | 18.1% | |
| custom 5436024601991722984 | 25 | 15.6% | |
| 💘 | 16 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5337297799371303781 | 11 | 6.88% | |
| custom 5434062252909019183 | 11 | 6.88% | |
| custom 5247012703431572346 | 10 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5370863282322153542 | 7 | 4.38% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 2.50% | |
| custom 5260392016184884508 | 3 | 1.88% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 1.25% | |
| custom 5285494592496477606 | 1 | 0.625% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2024 to 28 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ребята сюда, купил митку и танцпол на илью, оч рад 😁
❤7custom 53372977993713037814💋3custom 53708632823221535421
набор открыт! 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 1️⃣🅾️ ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ от d1exby3 и G3bej0x 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 •репост либо в любую активную группу (50+), свой канал(50+) ну или же нескольким друзьям, если ничего из вышеперечисленного нет! •подписка на организаторов если вас воодушевило наше творчество!!! •при желании поучавствовать, вам нужно лишь скинуть примеры своих полноценных работ, д…
💋2
я так подумал друзя, что это замечательно подходит на ремонт, да и тем более я уже начал перерисовывать этот арт, только чуть поменял их позы и идею. 🖕 дай боже что я закончу это, а не как другие штуки (арт с уиллом тоже в процессе)
❤7💋3custom 54340622529090191832custom 54360246019917229842
хосподя, я щас похоже словил артблок и чтобы хоть как-то выйти, я посмотрел пару советов на YouTube.🥲 было сказано, что можно попробовать перерисовать старые арты и как раз глянуть какой прогресс у тя
💋2custom 54360246019917229841
шота вот такое нежни хочется, оч нравится стримы где тоха с денисом
custom 54360246019917229848💘4❤2💋2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3💋3💘3
падпищки возьму ка рест на время, хочу потренироваться опять и чего-то поменять в стильке, а то как-то не гладко идёт, не теряйте пжшк
❤4💘1custom 54340622529090191831
1) ору дураки 2) норми, только чуть скучно и спаь хоч😇
custom 54340622529090191833custom 53708632823221535422💘1
о кстати я же новые реакции внесла 😀
custom 54340622529090191835custom 52470127034315723461
мне скучно на парах, побалакайте там в анонимках😅 (пожалуйста, лол) http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=1417360721
фто 😍 (випуха которую я ТОЧНО закончу )
💋8custom 53708632823221535424custom 54360246019917229844❤1💘1
полайкате няшек если вам интересн, потом скину инфу про них, как напишу ....🤗
custom 52603920161848845082
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kkediaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 761,275 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kkediaa named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“к333дя || РЕСТ” (@kkediaa), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kkediaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.