Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 王富贵😍回家的诱惑🫦

Supergroup

王富贵😍回家的诱惑🫦

@kk5869358

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

2,273members

-479 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

14 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002112086692
TypeSupergroup
Username@kk5869358
Description主频道课表:@Ff56235 副频道 https://t.me/wfg51234 私聊请认准唯一号 @kk586935 私聊不了的giegie 找双向机器人: @kk586935bot 群内有些成员发言和私信跟本人没任何关系。
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
On Telegramt.me/kk5869358

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2732,7672,5207 August 2026 — 2,752 members8 August 2026 — 2,767 members11 August 2026 — 2,733 members15 August 2026 — 2,678 members18 August 2026 — 2,654 members22 August 2026 — 2,590 members25 August 2026 — 2,502 members28 August 2026 — 2,463 members31 August 2026 — 2,440 members4 September 2026 — 2,417 members9 September 2026 — 2,331 members12 September 2026 — 2,288 members16 September 2026 — 2,273 members18 September 2026 — 2,273 members7 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -479. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,199–2,841 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:332,273no change
16 Sept 2026, 06:582,273-15
12 Sept 2026, 19:582,288-43
9 Sept 2026, 02:592,331-86
4 Sept 2026, 04:192,417-23
31 Aug 2026, 22:262,440-23
28 Aug 2026, 18:342,463-39
25 Aug 2026, 09:272,502-88
22 Aug 2026, 08:182,590-64
18 Aug 2026, 13:152,654-24
15 Aug 2026, 02:372,678-55
11 Aug 2026, 09:292,733-34
8 Aug 2026, 11:052,767+15
7 Aug 2026, 11:162,752first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“王富贵😍回家的诱惑🫦” (@kk5869358), 2,273 members as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kk5869358.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.