Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for K. James

Channel

K. James

@kjamestme

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,155subscribers

-87 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001568031082
TypeChannel
Username@kjamestme
DescriptionCanal officiel de K. James
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kjamestme

Growth

18,15518,24218,198.57 August 2026 — 18,242 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,242 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,233 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,230 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,217 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,204 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,192 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,179 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,168 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,155 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,142–18,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:2318,155-13
14 Aug 2026, 20:4818,168-11
13 Aug 2026, 08:5318,179-13
12 Aug 2026, 09:5718,192-12
11 Aug 2026, 09:0218,204-13
10 Aug 2026, 06:0118,217-13
9 Aug 2026, 05:0118,230-3
8 Aug 2026, 07:1318,233-9
7 Aug 2026, 08:3018,242no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:2118,242first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.3%
avg views ÷ 18,155 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,320
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.316%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (28 October 202530 July 2026)
Views total6,640
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
596
Videos
4
Links
47

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,371 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
76856.0%
🔥49836.3%
👍735.32%
🤩322.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,371reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 09:17 UTC≈3,470 views14 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Gros missile avec une grosse analyse pour aujourd'hui dispo ici : 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/+k5lCpCbzLxcwMzA0⁠ 👆👆👆👆👆👆👆

🔥131

4 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC≈7,930 views57 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Pour ce soir les amis, on part sur Canada vs Maroc, les deux équipes marquent, pour une cote de 2.00. Le Canada peut poser des problèmes offensivement, et le Maroc a largement les armes pour répondre. Sur ce type de match, je vois bien les deux équipes réussir à trouver le chemin des filets.

46🔥11

1 Jul 2026, 21:27 UTC≈7,290 views106 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Troisième victoire en trois matchs depuis hier les amis, on est sur une très belle dynamique. On ne va pas s’arrêter là. Je vous propose une nouvelle cote à 2.00, histoire de doubler encore une fois. Le pronostic du soir : USA vs Bosnie-Herzégovine, les deux équipes marquent : OUI. Let’s go les amis !

77🔥17👍9🤩3

1 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC≈5,950 views127 reactionsread 16 August 2026

C’est dans la poche ✅✅✅

🔥9125🤩7👍4

1 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC≈6,110 views125 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Je vous propose ce match pour ce soir ! Les deux équipes marquent, avec une superbe cote à 2.90. ✅

115👍7🔥3

29 Jun 2026, 12:54 UTC≈6,530 views260 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Quasiment un an sans publication… Ça mérite une récompense. Un petit cadeau pour vous ce soir pour doubler !

195🔥45👍14🤩6

6 Nov 2025, 10:41 UTC≈38,400 views83 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥4234🤩7

6 Nov 2025, 10:41 UTC≈33,800 views62 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Pour aujourd'hui, je propose la victoire du 𝗙𝗖 𝗣𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗼 combinée à la victoire de 𝗦𝗮𝗺𝘀𝘂𝗻𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗿 pour une 𝗰𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝘁𝗼𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗲 𝗱𝗲 𝟮.𝟭𝟬. J'envoie 𝟯𝟬.𝟬𝟬𝟬 personnellement dessus.

56🔥6

4 Nov 2025, 11:05 UTC≈21,700 views75 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Pour aujourd'hui, stratégie simple et efficace pour renouer avec la victoire ! Je me place sur les victoires de 𝗡𝗮𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘀 et de l'𝗔𝘁𝗹𝗲́𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗼 𝗠𝗮𝗱𝗿𝗶𝗱 pour une cote totale de 𝟮.𝟮𝟬. Deux formations en pleine confiance, 𝗮̀ 𝗱𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗹𝗲 et contre des adversaires nettement inférieurs.

🔥5715👍3

1 Nov 2025, 11:12 UTC≈17,600 views59 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Je propose aujourd’hui deux tickets : ⚽ Victoire de Marseille Supérieur dans tous les compartiments du jeu, l’OM ne devrait laisser aucune chance à Auxerre. Avec 8 défaites sur les 10 derniers matchs, le club bourguignon semble condamné avant même la fin de saison. Chaque rencontre tourne à la correction, souvent avec plusieurs buts d’écart. De son côté, Marseille réalise une belle saison, aussi bien en championnat

49👍10

1 Nov 2025, 11:11 UTC≈8,950 views30 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥255

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kjamestme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DjetKar 😎
@djetkarprochannel · 626,941
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“K. James” (@kjamestme), 18,155 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kjamestme.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.