Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for C A T W O R M

Channel

C A T W O R M

@kittyworm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,781subscribers

+76 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002399122233
TypeChannel
Username@kittyworm
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kittyworm

Growth

1,7051,7881,746.56 August 2026 — 1,705 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,710 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,742 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,788 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,781 subscribers1,7816 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 11 days, net +76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,693–1,800 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:541,781-7
13 Aug 2026, 11:171,788+46
10 Aug 2026, 11:121,742+32
7 Aug 2026, 06:001,710+5
6 Aug 2026, 07:061,705first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 1,781 subscribers
Avg views / post
471
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held31 (2 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total14,134
Reactions total2,935
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,502 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 534849346485200359160740.4%
custom 536416096867688325745130.0%
custom 540906708084459562029019.3%
custom 521994321678199502015410.3%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,935reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 30 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kittyworm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC60 views13 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Тоже тапайте пожалуйста Во имя Винч

custom 52199432167819950209custom 54090670808445956204

7 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC786 views109 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

С др лабуба https://t.me/shzhivinci Я все таки решил спидран…

custom 521994321678199502055custom 540906708084459562034custom 534849346485200359118custom 53641609686768832572

7 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC261 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сколько тут мили крутых челов Спасибо что даете посмотреть чу вы делаете Вы молодцы

custom 534849346485200359136custom 54090670808445956209custom 53641609686768832576

7 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC303 views96 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Покажите, кто что рисует! И каналы сюда давайте ваши

custom 534849346485200359150custom 540906708084459562026custom 536416096867688325720

7 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC333 views128 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Птиц

custom 534849346485200359189custom 536416096867688325725custom 540906708084459562014

6 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC193 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shzhivinciPhoto

🤍🤍🤍HAPPY B-DAY TO ME 🤍 🤍🤍🤍сегодня мне исполнилось 19 лет 🤍🤍🤍 несмотря на то, сколько жести у меня произошло в жизни за этот год я рада, что у меня есть этот канал и такая замечательная аудитория. спасибо всем за то, что вы продолжаете следить за моим творчеством, помогаете продвигать его и вдохновляете меня своими комментариями по традиции лучший подарок для художника - репост его работ. очень хотелось бы добить 4к 🤩

custom 534849346485200359129custom 53641609686768832575

6 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC356 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я вроде сегодня ниче такого не делал Откуда налетели подписчики?..

custom 534849346485200359140custom 536416096867688325712

6 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC380 views50 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Добейте до 300 реактов пожажуйста

custom 534849346485200359138custom 536416096867688325712

6 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC395 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Винчи опять балуется

custom 521994321678199502039custom 53484934648520035919custom 53641609686768832578

6 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC425 views78 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Ля, а вы и правда начали набирать так много реактов Я довольни

custom 534849346485200359149custom 536416096867688325717custom 521994321678199502012

6 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC424 views86 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @arnkobaPhoto

Коллега подтолкнул меня на эту чёто типа трендовую штуку и я просто скажу о да души меня накаченный дядя #OC@arnkoba • #Sketch@arnkoba

custom 534849346485200359167custom 536416096867688325719

6 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC422 views82 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Кому звезду на канал кинуть?

custom 540906708084459562059custom 534849346485200359114custom 53641609686768832579

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @kittyworm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,711 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 59 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“C A T W O R M” (@kittyworm), 1,781 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kittyworm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.