Channel
@kitty_vp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001908121170 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kitty_vp |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 26 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kitty_vp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 1 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 2 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 2 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2023 to 11 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😳REALLY🤯❓ JUNGKOOK (BTS) KÒPINCHA NETFLIX DAN KÒP SAHNALARI 🔞YOKI 21+ ⭕️BÒLGAN SERIADA SURATGA TUSHISH TAKLIFINI OLADI😳😱 ⁉️XÒSH BUNGA ENTERTAINMENT NIMA DEYDI😳🤯😱 ⁉️BTS TARQALGANIDAN SÒNG JK ROSTAN HAM BU TAKLIFNI OLMOQCHI BÒLSA🤬😩😳 BIASINGIN JK BÒLSA SHOSHILING⭕️ ‼️5MINUTDAN KYN ÒCHIRILADI‼️
♡_« ⾕ ⋮ 𝐀 𝐋 𝐖𝐀𝐘𝐒 𝐇 𝐄 𝐑𝐄 ⋆ ࣪ » @kitty_mix そして一緒に ִֶָ @kitty_minii ◌ 🌷 𝟏𝟗𝟔 𔘓 @ᴋɪᴛᴛʏ_ᴍɪx ᴋᴀɴᴀʟɪ òᴢ ꜰᴀᴏʟɪʏᴀᴛɪɴɪ ʏᴀɴᴀ ʙᴏsʜʟᴀᴅɪ❗️ ᴋᴀɴᴀʟ ʏᴀɴᴀ ᴏʙᴜɴᴀᴄʜɪʟᴀʀɪɴɪ ʏɪɢᴍᴏǫᴅᴀ..💘 ᘏ⑅ᘏ 𝘁𝗲𝗲𝗻𝘆.𝙲o.< 1 .. 2 .. 3 .. > oMG! adorabble - ie @kitty_mix
🚫OMG SHOCK🚫 ❓BTSNING JUST DANCE QÒSHIGI ... UCHUN YOZILGAN😰 BALKI BIRONTA QIZ UCHUN YÒZILGANDIR😱🤯😳 ❓JK MAKTABDA KÒZLARINI SOCHI BILAN BERKITGAN😳😥 BALKI ÒSHA PAYT KÒZIDA CHANDIGI BÒLGANDIR😱🤯 ❓BIR ARMY YIGIT DÒKONDA JKNI UCHRATIB QOLGAN☺️, AMMO DASXAT BERISHINI SÒRAGAN ,DASXAT BERDI😆 SAVOL U NIMAGA(narsa)DASXAT BERGAN😱😳🥵
Channel name was changed to «VP 怹 kiȶȶꭚ»
🤣WOW🤣 KIM TAEHYUNG NING OYOQ KIYIM RAZMERINI BILASIZMI🤨😂 AGAR BIASINGIZ BÒLSA BILISHINGIZ SHART😅🫶🏻 4...... KEYINGI SON QIZIGA😆 ‼️TEZROQ 5MINUTDAN KYN ÒCHIRILADI‼️
💔OMG😭 ❓JK DEBYUT QILSHIDAN OLDIN BIR QIZ BILAN GAPLASHGAN EKAN😱😳🥵 U QIZ IDOL BÒLGAN😤🤬😱 ❓JIMIN SIPRLI ICHIMLIKLAR ISTEMOL QILSAA...🚭🚷🆘 U HAMMAHA TAJOVUZ BILAN...😨😳 ❓KIM TAEHYUNG BAZIDA TUNGI KLUBGA🚷BORADI VA YERSA U CHARCHOQ YOZADI🚫, XÒSH U BALKI...🆘 ‼️‼️TEZROQ 5MINUTDAN KYN ÒCHIRILADI‼️‼️
👍1
😱WOOOW SHOCK😱 ❓LISAGA MASHHUR GURUHDAN UCHRASHISH TAKLIFI KELAGAN😰😤🤯 ❓JENNIE NING TAEHYUNG BILAN UCHRASHI ROSTMI😭😫😰 ❓ROSE BTS😓NING QAYSI AZOSI BILAN YAXSHI TIL TOPISHA OLADI😳😱 ❓JISOO NING YIGITI BORMI🥵🫢 🚫SHOSHILING , 5MINUTDAN KYN ÒCHIRILADI🚫
😱OMG😱 BTS NING BLACKPINKDAN BIASLARI BOR EKAN😳😰🫢 SIZ AYTISHINGIZ MUMKIM, AMMO...😑🤯😳 BAKLI BTSDAN BIASINGIZ🤔 BLACKPINKDAGI BIRONTA NAFRATLANADIGAN🤫 ODAMINGIZDANDIR😳😰 ‼️‼️TEZROQ 5 MINUTDAN KEYIN ÒCHIRILADI‼️‼️
👍1
OMG😳🤯 BIASINGIZ JK🐰 MI? UNDA RASMGA QARANG🫨🤧 🚫NEGA ULAR AJRALISHGA QAROR QILISHGAN❓ 🚫NEGA QIZ JK NI MENSIMAGAN VA ....❓ BIZ SIZ UCHUN JK NING OLDINGIZ SEVGILISI HAQIDA MALUMOT TOPDIK🤫🫡😓 BUNI BILISHINGIZ SHART‼️
KIM TAEHYUNG ning ideal qizi qanday⁉️ (balki u qiz siz dir ) ▶️SOCHLARI UCHUN YOKI KALTA BÒLISHI KERAKMI⁉️ ▶️U QIZ TAEDAN KATTA YOKI KOCHIK BÒLISHI KERAKMI⁉️ ▶️AGAR SEVGAN QIZI MUSULMON BÒLSA U NIMA QILADI⁉️ ▶️U SEVGILISI BILAN NIMA TOMOSHA QILIB ÒTIRISHNI HOHLAYDI⁉️ BU SAVOLLARGA SIZ ALBATTA JAVOB TOPISHINGIZ KERAK💯 BALKI SIZ UNING IDEALIDIRSIZ💘
OMG🤯 BTS MEMBERLARI ICHIDA ENG KÒP ALKAGOK🍺 ISTEMOL QILADIGAN 2TA AZO BOR🚭❓ BULAR QAYSI AZOLAR😫😢 BALKI BU SIZNING BIASINGIZ😳🤯.....
OMG SHOCK🤯 KPOP IDOLIDAN BIRI OG'IR KASAL😰😳 U OPERATSIYAGA MUHTOJ, AMMO ENTERTAINMENT BUNGA YÒL QÒYMAYAPTI😰😭 QAYSI IDOL😭 BALKI BU BTS AZOSIDAN..😱🤯😭🥵
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kitty_vp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,551,751 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kitty_vp named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VP 怹 kiȶȶꭚ” (@kitty_vp), 1 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kitty_vp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.