Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КИЦА МАРКЕТ Санкт-Петербург

Channel

КИЦА МАРКЕТ Санкт-Петербург

@kitsamarketspb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,467subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002144229041
TypeChannel
Username@kitsamarketspb
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kitsamarketspb

Growth

3,4443,4673,455.56 August 2026 — 3,444 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,444 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,446 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,455 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,467 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,441–3,470 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:083,467+12
9 Aug 2026, 20:513,455+9
6 Aug 2026, 14:543,446+2
6 Aug 2026, 11:303,444no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:243,444first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.0%
avg views ÷ 3,467 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,010
1 post measured
Reaction rate
18.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held14 (14 June 202626 July 2026)
Views total2,010
Reactions total370
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,870 reactions across 13 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
87830.6%
❤‍🔥58820.5%
💘32111.2%
😭2398.33%
💋1996.93%
1133.94%
😢792.75%
🔥722.51%
🍓712.47%
🥰622.16%
🤷‍♂612.13%
😱381.32%
👍311.08%
🤣200.697%
🎄160.557%
👀130.453%
🙏90.314%
🦄70.244%
😍60.209%
🤷‍♀60.209%
15 further kinds411.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,870reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 18:51 UTC≈2,010 views370 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tripleffpS

Дорогие! Мы уже прочитали это распоряжение и с завтрашнего дня будем решать с администрацией трц по поводу согласования косплей-маркета кица в отдельном порядке. Думаю, что все будет хорошо, если управа района будет заранее проинформирована, что это все карнавал и не более.

209💘79🥰37❤‍🔥19👀10🤣6🔥3🍓2

15 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC≈4,430 views377 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И ещё один важный момент. Сейчас в целом организовывать массовые мероприятия стало крайне сложно. А делать это с БЕСПЛАТНЫМ входом и для нескольких тысяч человек - ещё сложнее. Помимо самого маркета, мы организуем полноценную программу: арендуем мебель, звук, оборудование, договариваемся с площадкой, координируем десятки авторов, ведущих, волонтёров и решаем огромное количество технических вопросов. И всё это мы де

❤‍🔥212💘7154🤣8😢8💋6🤷‍♂6😴4

15 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC≈3,930 views340 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, хотим немного пояснить ситуацию. Всё было полностью согласовано, но по техническим причинам нам предложили перенести мероприятие на парковку «Охта Молла» - на самый верх, то есть фактически под открытым небом. А это Санкт-Петербург. Здесь погода может измениться за считанные минуты, и проводить целый маркет на открытой парковке - слишком большой риск как для авторов, так и для гостей. До последнего момента

💋173😢6242💘25❤‍🔥12🤷‍♂11🤣6🦄4

15 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «КИЦА МАРКЕТ Санкт-Петербург»

15 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC≈3,190 views374 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🐱 Дорогие котята! К сожалению, по техническим причинам КИЦА в июле переносится. Приносим свои извинения за доставленные неудобства. Мы до последнего пытались найти запасную площадку, чтобы провести маркет в запланированные даты, но, к сожалению, подходящего варианта не нашлось. Также хотим заранее предупредить, что августовская КИЦА может пройти уже на другой локации. Как только у нас появится окончательная информ

😭239🤷‍♂44❤‍🔥3226💘7😢7🤷‍♀6😱4

10 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC≈4,430 views460 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Важная информация для наших гостей. Как вы понимаете, сейчас в стране напряжённая ситуация. Идут военные действия, и, несмотря на то что мы стараемся держаться максимально далеко от политики, это всё равно может касаться каждого из нас. В последние полгода нашим гостям - и не только нашим - начали писать странные аккаунты в личные сообщения. Обычно это просьбы познакомиться "из кошачьего чата", прислать координаты,

223113💘64🍓17😱14❤‍🔥13🔥6🎃3

16 Jun 2026, 18:34 UTC≈11,400 views380 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дорогие КОТЯТА! 18-19 июля 15-16 августа Вот вам спойлер! Набор авторов и крафтеров на маркет https://vk.me/ffporg Количество мест ограничено. Чтобы получить ответ быстрее, напишите "КИЦА ПИТЕР" в группу авторов.

❤‍🔥19391🍓37😱20🔥13💘7😍6👍4

14 Jun 2026, 15:34 UTC≈7,440 views223 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

контееенннеттттт

121🔥46🥰25🙏7❤‍🔥6💋4💔3💘3

14 Jun 2026, 14:59 UTC≈3,670 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

16💘8❤‍🔥4🍓1🎄1

14 Jun 2026, 14:59 UTC≈3,810 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10❤‍🔥6💘5🍓1🎄1

14 Jun 2026, 14:59 UTC≈3,720 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

11💘8🍓3❤‍🔥1🎄1🏆1

14 Jun 2026, 14:59 UTC≈4,690 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💘149❤‍🔥2🍓1🎄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @kitsamarketspb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 19,953 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КИЦА МАРКЕТ Санкт-Петербург” (@kitsamarketspb), 3,467 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kitsamarketspb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.