🌟 NEW ERA. 🌟 𝐊𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐀 прошли с новым, неожиданным номером на баттл от оргтим. увидимся уже 8.12, приготовьте нечто согревающие, потому что мы - 💎💎💎 💎💎💎💎💎💎💎 🌟
⚡4❤3🔥3

Channel
@kitanasteam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001676484386 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kitanasteam |
| Description | канал нашей чудной тимы. подписывайтесь ради чистой кожи и быстрого дэнса. 🍒 |
| Created | 12 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kitanasteam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 42 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 42 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 4 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
78 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 48.7% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 14.1% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 10.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 7.69% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 7.69% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 5.13% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2024 to 20 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 NEW ERA. 🌟 𝐊𝐈𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐀 прошли с новым, неожиданным номером на баттл от оргтим. увидимся уже 8.12, приготовьте нечто согревающие, потому что мы - 💎💎💎 💎💎💎💎💎💎💎 🌟
⚡4❤3🔥3
👼 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 👼 И года не прошло.. 25 февраля на сцене Siren K-pop Party состав 2.0 выступил на сцене с best dance in the world: 💎💎💎💎💎 - 💎💎💎💎💎. ❣️ Спасибо за работу: KARINA - @moonshine1123893 GISELLE - @e_ayla NING NING - @avebastett WINTER - @LolitaGui https://youtu.be/jyjavuPxziE
❤4🤯2🔥1
🧍🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🧍 https://youtu.be/Ac5S1kB-n5A И года не прошл.. а нет, прошёл. Спустя год после выступления видео все же появляется на канале коллаба. Огромное спасибо участникам @axis23_cdt, @piratecdkrd, @HEATHENSCDT, @insane_cdt, @solarcdt, @crescendo_cd, @phobiacoverdanceteam, @triggercovergroup за участие в проекте. ❤️
❤🔥5❤2🔥1
✨️ Кавер вышел. ~ Спасибо тем, кто заглянул на премьеру. 💗 https://youtu.be/G16QPm_XlGI
❤6🥰2
💗 Yeah, it's so bad it's good 원하면 감히 뛰어들어 https://youtu.be/G16QPm_XlGI ❗️ Премьера в 18:00. IVE - 아이브 "LOVE DIVE" 가사 𝘠𝘶𝘫𝘪𝘯 - @e_ayla 𝘞𝘰𝘯𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘨 - @annoinga 𝘓𝘦𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘰 - @ness018 𝘎𝘢𝘦𝘶𝘭 - @avebastett 𝘓𝘪𝘻 - @LolitaSem 𝘙𝘦𝘪 - @adusjb ➪ Представляем вам наш долгожданный кавер на чудесных девочек Айв! ✨️ Ставьте лайки, пишите комментарии. 💞 Слишком жесткую критику можно оставить при себе, потому что проект делался исключител
❤3🔥1
💗 𝕀𝕍𝔼 - 𝓛𝓸𝓿𝓮 𝓓𝓲𝓿𝓮 ɔouɔǝdʇ dɥoʇo #6. Yeah, it's so bad it's good 원하면 감히 뛰어들어 𝓦𝓸𝓷𝔂𝓸𝓾𝓷𝓰: @annoinga 𝓡𝓮𝓲: @adusjb
❤4💘3
💗 𝕀𝕍𝔼 - 𝓛𝓸𝓿𝓮 𝓓𝓲𝓿𝓮 ɔouɔǝdʇ dɥoʇo #5. Narcissistic My God, I love it 서로를 비춘 밤 𝓦𝓸𝓷𝔂𝓸𝓾𝓷𝓰: @annoinga 𝓡𝓮𝓲: @adusjb
🥰3❤1❤🔥1💋1💘1
💗 𝕀𝕍𝔼 - 𝓛𝓸𝓿𝓮 𝓓𝓲𝓿𝓮 ɔouɔǝdʇ dɥoʇo #4. 네가 참 궁금해 그건 너도 마찬가지 이거면 충분해 쫓고 쫓는 이런 놀이 𝓖𝓪𝓮𝓾𝓵: @avebastett 𝓨𝓾𝓳𝓲𝓷: @e_ayla
❤4🥰2
💗 𝕀𝕍𝔼 - 𝓛𝓸𝓿𝓮 𝓓𝓲𝓿𝓮 ɔouɔǝdʇ dɥoʇo #3. Yeah, it's so bad it's good 난 그 맘을 좀 봐야겠어 𝓖𝓪𝓮𝓾𝓵: @avebastett 𝓨𝓾𝓳𝓲𝓷: @e_ayla
❤4🍓2🥰1
💗 𝕀𝕍𝔼 - 𝓛𝓸𝓿𝓮 𝓓𝓲𝓿𝓮 ɔouɔǝdʇ dɥoʇo #2. 직접 들어와 두 눈으로 확인해 내 맘 가장 깊은 데로 오면 돼 𝓛𝓮𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓸: @ness018 𝓛𝓲𝔃: @LolitaSem
❤5🥰2
💗 𝕀𝕍𝔼 - 𝓛𝓸𝓿𝓮 𝓓𝓲𝓿𝓮 ɔouɔǝdʇ dɥoʇo #1. Oh, perfect sacrifice Yeah, 숨 참고 love dive 𝓛𝓮𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓸: @ness018 𝓛𝓲𝔃: @LolitaSem
❤2💘2🔥2🥰1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @kitanasteam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 603,255 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kitanasteam named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝕂𝕀𝕋𝔸ℕ𝔸 𖤍 𝕋𝔼𝔸𝕄” (@kitanasteam), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kitanasteam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.