Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

上海上门 杭州上门 深圳上门 Kiss严选

@kiss07

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,788subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001983518659
TypeChannel
Username@kiss07
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kiss07

Growth

8,7888,8188,8036 August 2026 — 8,816 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,816 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,818 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,804 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,788 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,784–8,823 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:578,788-16
9 Aug 2026, 22:128,804-14
7 Aug 2026, 02:248,818+2
6 Aug 2026, 20:158,816no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:068,816first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.582%
avg views ÷ 8,788 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.2
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held6 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total307
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
13s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC111 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#杭州 张艺兴🎒XH164C #苹 嘟嘟 🍎09年164cm 42kg真实🐱C 🍎真实👩🏻‍🎓上下粉嫩bb非常紧 🍎学长 下课一起回家吗😘 🍎极品嫩汁萝莉 初恋的 感觉 千载难逢的顶级女孩~ 🍎纯情女高 小甜妹 🍎盈盈一握小细腰 清纯可爱 🍎上下粉嫩紧致 💦多多 🍎双商高 乖巧听话 不催不事♡ 🍎配合各种姿势 🉑口🉑🐍🉑🚗🉑🛁 🍎说话幽默风趣 值得你一见 ❤️求哥哥给一次机会让我好好服务您❤️ #西湖区

7 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC85 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#杭州 张艺兴🎒XH171D #苹 瑶瑶 真实👩🏻‍🎓🈚纹身 上下粉嫩bb非常紧 🍎学长 下课一起回家吗😘 🍎极品嫩汁萝莉 初恋的 感觉 千载难逢的顶级女孩~ 🍎08年 纯情女高 小甜妹 🍎171cm 49kg 天然🐻D 🍎盈盈一握小细腰 清纯可爱 🍎上下粉嫩紧致 💦多多 🍎双商高 乖巧听话 不催不事♡ 🍎后入超大屁屁 细腰翘臀 绝佳视觉享受 🎀双手掌握🍑活好粘人 水多不粘手 🎀甜度严重超标 想被哥哥抱起来doi 🎀女友般体验 只接待素质援助 🎀刚破处 体质敏感 易湿会吸娇喘 🎀主动配合100% 自动摇摇机 榨汁机 🍹 痉挛高潮一触即发♡ 🎀 待哥哥如初恋般热情 主动和哥哥索💋 主动口 主动求干 爱爱叫声超甜🥰 ❤️本人温柔体贴可爱大方♡好评满满🙂 ❤️求哥哥给一次机会让我好好服务您❤️ #西湖区

7 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC54 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#杭州 张艺兴🎒SC172D #苹 初夏 🍎童颜巨乳,纯天然 初次下氵短期兼职 🍎身高:172CM 胸围:D 体重:100斤 ✨明朗干净 配合度高 🉑👄🉑配合各种姿势 🍎美丽在线🍑雪白牛奶🥛肌. 皮肤超細膩 白皙滑嫩 💗声音甜美 声优控天菜 所见即所得 🍭🈵️🈵️女友感 初恋白月光 极品女友体验 只接待高素质K 紧致 一碰就哗哗流水 • 𝐇𝐨𝐛𝐛𝐲兴趣/ 旅游 画画 阅读 烘焙… 等风等雨等你 💗 爆汁 #西湖区

6 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC24 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#上海 千寻🏠#徐汇区 E136可芯 5起质量 短暂开3 极品气质御姐大米范儿 25岁/D/178cm/108kg 素质极佳 热情主动洋气大牌 身材火辣 温柔体贴 穿衣大牌不风尘 身材比例完美 高瘦气质不脱俗 腰肢柔软 只接待素质客 本人比照片有气质 期待与你相遇 #舌吻 #六九

6 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC20 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#上海 千寻🏠#普陀区 E111 雯雯 台北下了雪你說那是保麗龍 这是TikTok 和iNS的小網紅!!!! 22歲 !!170 !!53kg !!C cup 極品蜜桃臀 !臀圍高達惊人 97 !!! 极品 90:63:97 黃金3:2:3三圍!! 后天 白虎 激光脱毛 一根毛都没有! #六九 #外远5

6 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC13 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#上海 千寻🏠#黄浦区 v209 圆圆 家3外5 纯御🍒巨乳 E天然0整 02 165 体重85 照片均为本人生活自拍🈲️🐱认准手机尾号3184 穿衣清纯 脱衣风 sao 高情商 服务态度一流 身材比例完美 无半点赘肉 服务超好 ▽ 超细筷子蹆 蹆控爱好 #舌吻 #六九

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @kiss07. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 306,374 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“上海上门 杭州上门 深圳上门 Kiss严选” (@kiss07), 8,788 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kiss07.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.