Kiss®️严选外围商K包Yang修车报告 ✨基础信息 【妹子花名】:#黄金叶 【验证留名】:timeov 【验证时间】:8:60 🌟硬件评价 【妹子年龄】:看上去20左右 💫综合评价 【优点缺点】:胸不太大,态度不错,腿上有个纹身,比较紧,叫床声音大,脸还可以 【性价比】:满分10.0分/8 【推荐程度】满分10.0分/8 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) ☀️【个人发挥】:总体而言还可以,脸算中上吧,妹子很年轻,就是身材有点太瘦了,态度还是挺可以的,不过确实是有点羞涩不太爱说话。嫩妹理解总结还不错

Channel
成都kiss|成都萝莉|成都资源 最真实反馈报告
@kiss06
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,636subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001762234005 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @kiss06 @kiss666111 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kiss06 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 6,636 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 6,634 | -35 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 6,669 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 6,666 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 6,678 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 6,678 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 6,676 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 6,669 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.39%
- avg views ÷ 6,636 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 557
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (3 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,242 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 50s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Kiss外围ᵏᴵˢˢ会员反馈 因为专注|所以专业 【花名】: #西施好评 【反馈】: 挺好的 🥺永久联系Id @kiss666 频道均为Kiss会员反馈|或部分Kiss亲自见面&以防踩雷
Kiss外围ᵏᴵˢˢ会员反馈 因为专注|所以专业 【花名】: #金珠岚好评 【反馈】: 皮肤好,服务好 很会夹一般的遭不住 🥺永久联系Id @kiss666 频道均为Kiss会员反馈|或部分Kiss亲自见面&以防踩雷
Kiss外围ᵏᴵˢˢ会员反馈 因为专注|所以专业 【花名】: #巨乳好评 【反馈】: 能加钟的选手 🥺永久联系Id @kiss666 频道均为Kiss会员反馈|或部分Kiss亲自见面&以防踩雷
Kiss外围ᵏᴵˢˢ会员反馈 因为专注|所以专业 【花名】: #楚宁好评 【反馈】: 人照合一,服务很好, 🥺永久联系Id @kiss666 频道均为Kiss会员反馈|或部分Kiss亲自见面&以防踩雷
Kiss外围ᵏᴵˢˢ会员反馈 因为专注|所以专业 【花名】: #上海好评 【反馈】: 🦜硬5 的是舒服 🥺永久联系Id @kiss666 频道均为Kiss会员反馈|或部分Kiss亲自见面&以防踩雷
Kiss外围ᵏᴵˢˢ会员反馈 因为专注|所以专业 【花名】: #以晴好评 【反馈】: 操起来|真几把爽 🥺永久联系Id @kiss666 频道均为Kiss会员反馈|或部分Kiss亲自见面&以防踩雷
Kiss®️严选外围商K包Yang修车报告 ✨基础信息 【妹子花名】:#王小小 【验证留名】:Zp 【验证时间】:8.4 🌟硬件评价 【妹子年龄】: 💫综合评价 【优点缺点】: 【性价比】:满分10.0分/ 【推荐程度】满分10.0分/ 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) ☀️【个人发挥】:给妹妹一个超级好评,人美声甜,身材好,胸大屁股大,口活好,情绪价值满满的,床上很反差,有点小调皮,床下聊天很亲和,不冷场,值得推荐 🔴🔴🔴 进 成 都 每 日 更 新🔴🔴🔴
Kiss外围ᵏᴵˢˢ会员反馈 因为专注|所以专业 【花名】: #佳佳好评 【反馈】: 因为选择kiss|所以必须开心 🥺永久联系Id @kiss666 频道均为Kiss会员反馈|或部分Kiss亲自见面&以防踩雷
Kiss外围ᵏᴵˢˢ会员反馈 因为专注|所以专业 【花名】: #噗噗好评 【反馈】: 服务不错,态度好人可以 🥺永久联系Id @kiss666 频道均为Kiss会员反馈|或部分Kiss亲自见面&以防踩雷
Kiss外围ᵏᴵˢˢ会员反馈 因为专注|所以专业 【花名】: #思涵好评 【反馈】: 服务态度,服务都挺好的, 🥺永久联系Id @kiss666 频道均为Kiss会员反馈|或部分Kiss亲自见面&以防踩雷
Kiss外围ᵏᴵˢˢ会员反馈 因为专注|所以专业 【花名】: #思涵好评 【反馈】: 熟悉的味道, 🥺永久联系Id @kiss666 频道均为Kiss会员反馈|或部分Kiss亲自见面&以防踩雷
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kiss06. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 180,290 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“成都kiss|成都萝莉|成都资源 最真实反馈报告” (@kiss06), 6,636 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kiss06.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.