2 measurements spanning 1 day, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92–101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 21:58
100
+7
9 Nov 2026, 17:22
93
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 30 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1875.5%
avg views ÷ 100 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,880
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.613%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 5 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
5 (30 October 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
3,751
Reactions total
23
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 2 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12
52.2%
👍
4
17.4%
💯
3
13.0%
🆒
2
8.70%
🔥
2
8.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
[단독] “2800조 AI 인프라 잡자”… 포스코·GS, 데이터센터 ‘동맹’
- 포스코와 GS가 인공지능 데이터센터(AIDC) 시장 공략을 위해 손을 잡는다. 포스코의 철강 소재·솔루션과 GS그룹의 해외 영업과 시공 역량을 결합한다. 이를 통해 글로벌 데이터센터 시장 공략에 나선다
- 9일 업계에 따르면, 포스코와 GS는 AIDC 관련 사업 협력을 추진하고 있다. 이달 안에 공식화할 것으로 알려졌다. 최근 미국 중간선거 이후 데이터센터 건설 규제 우려가 커지고 있지만, 이번 협력을 통해 각 사의 사업 경쟁력을 높이고 기존 수요산업의 부진을 돌파할 새로운 시장을 개척한다는 구상이다.
- 구체적인 사업 범위와 대상 프로젝트는 아직 확정되지 않았으나, 기존 사업을 고려하면 데이터센터와 전력 인프라에 필요한 특화 강재 공급, 해외 프로젝트 발굴…
[한투증권 황현정] 건설
안녕하세요 한투증권 황현정입니다.
건설업종에 대해 비중확대 의견으로 커버리지를 개시합니다. 주택사업의 체질 개선을 빠르게 실적으로 연결하면서 비주택 사업도 가시화할 수 있는 기업을 선호합니다. 최근 중간선거로 국내 데이터센터 관련 투심이 환기되고 있는 만큼 Top-pick으로 GS건설을 제시드립니다.
▪️주택: 이익의 체질이 달라졌다
- 건설사가 공사비에 리스크를 충분히 반영하고 사업을 시작할 수 있는 국면
- 변화는 이미 숫자로 확인. 2023년 이후 평당 공사비 상승률이 원가 상승률을 웃돌고 있음
- 배경은 정비사업의 수급 불균형. 공사비 급등기를 거친 대형사는 선별수주를 이어가는 반면, 금융비용 부담이 커진 조합은 기다릴 여유가 없음
- 대출규제까지 더해져 자금력을 갖춘 대형사 선호가 더 강해졌고, 그 결과 …
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @kis_con. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[한투증권 황현정] 건설/부동산/리츠 🏡” (@kis_con), 100 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kis_con.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.