Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝖐𝖎𝖗𝖋𝖋

Channel

𝖐𝖎𝖗𝖋𝖋

@kirffi20

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

146subscribers

+105 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003933085851
TypeChannel
Username@kirffi20
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 20 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kirffi20

Growth

4114693.524 August 2026 — 41 subscribers25 August 2026 — 60 subscribers1 September 2026 — 146 subscribers24 August 20261 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +105. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 22:36146+86
25 Aug 2026, 02:3560+19
24 Aug 2026, 06:1541first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.6%
avg views ÷ 146 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.2
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
26.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held19 (20 August 202623 August 2026)
Views total821
Reactions total221
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

221 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53325669057796972907533.9%
🕊3314.9%
custom 53979579933146685922913.1%
custom 5291889184619909030135.88%
custom 5314597462692895993125.43%
custom 5397629015999663394125.43%
custom 5370657733777316155104.52%
custom 539541128386656931583.62%
custom 539577674263378529673.17%
custom 541829255033732048952.26%
😭41.81%
custom 533924600512672585531.36%
custom 539542362760257710731.36%
custom 541385165723246647620.905%
custom 543169361709999564420.905%
🎄20.905%
custom 539538602516390164410.452%

Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kirffi20. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 August 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC17 views6 reactionsread 24 August 2026

огромное спасибо за звездочки!! 🌟

custom 54182925503373204894custom 54316936170999956442

23 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC31 views22 reactions1 Starread 24 August 2026

почти 40 пдп я в шоке полном 🥹🥹 для меня это прям пиздец как приятно

custom 531459746269289599312🕊4custom 52918891846199090304custom 53706577337773161551custom 54182925503373204891

23 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC40 views9 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

пробую новый формат.. не знаю какой вариант ему больше подходит

custom 53706577337773161559

23 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC43 views12 reactionsread 24 August 2026

когда нибудь у меня будет больше реакций на постах и я буду очень рада....

🕊6🎄2custom 53954112838665693152custom 54138516572324664762

23 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC44 views4 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😭2custom 53976290159996633942

23 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC40 views26 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

так называемый первый реквестик 🙂

custom 533256690577969729014custom 52918891846199090307custom 53954112838665693154custom 53392460051267258551

23 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC42 views16 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

мой персонаж фредди катается смотреть всем

custom 53325669057796972909custom 53979579933146685923custom 52918891846199090302custom 53392460051267258552

22 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC43 views11 reactionsread 24 August 2026

я задумывабсь о коммишках как думаете рано еще да просто типа реквесты оставить открытыми но и начать делать коммиш

custom 53976290159996633946custom 53325669057796972903custom 53957767426337852962

22 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC45 views11 reactionsread 24 August 2026

охуеть у меня заказали два арта я в шоке я рада 🌚🌚

custom 53325669057796972907🕊4

22 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC49 views11 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53325669057796972907custom 53954236276025771073custom 53979579933146685921

22 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC40 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @Piar_HydognikovPhoto

🧑‍🚀У искусства есть одна суровая правда: его ценят только тогда, когда его видят. Благодаря удобному боту, который моментально проверит и отложит ваш пост, аудитория и художники смогут легко найти друг друга🤝 Здесь твои работы увидят не просто зрители, а потенциальные заказчики и влюблённые в искусство люди❤️ Конкуренции нет - есть место, где каждый художник чувствует плечо соседа. Вместе мы создаём среду, в которо

😭1custom 53325669057796972901

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kirffi20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝖐𝖎𝖗𝖋𝖋” (@kirffi20), 146 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kirffi20.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.