Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Кинопуб

@kinopub_uz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,796subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001709196381
TypeChannel
Username@kinopub_uz
Created9 November 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kinopub_uz

Growth

3,7963,8083,8026 August 2026 — 3,808 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,807 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,800 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,796 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,794–3,810 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:563,796-4
10 Aug 2026, 09:123,800-7
7 Aug 2026, 02:053,807-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:013,808first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
104.8%
avg views ÷ 3,796 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,980
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (12 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total43,740
Reactions total799
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 48s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

933 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁52556.3%
👍19120.5%
❤‍🔥11612.4%
💯727.72%
🤩121.29%
🤯121.29%
🤔40.429%
👎10.107%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 933reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC≈1,420 views99 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Зендая бир йилда учта киноси милиард касса қилган актёрга айланиши мумкин экан. Человек-паук’ миллиарддан ошди. Одиссея тез кунларда йиғса керак. Дюна ҳам йил якунида чиқади, у ҳам ўша атрофда касса қилиши кутилмоқда.

😁90❤‍🔥7👍2

5 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,670 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Расман, мен учун йилнинг энг зўр хоррори: Зовещие мертвецы: пекло (2026). Видеолар спойлерга тўла, шунчаки ўзимга жуда ёқиб кетган жойларини алоҳида белгилаб кўрсатяпман. Топ. Телефонни ёнбошлатиб кўринглар. Видеони хомиладор аёллар, ёш болалар ва аниме мухлислари кўриши қатъиян ман этилади. 18+

😁44👍5🤔3❤‍🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC≈2,440 views129 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Аргентинада "Человек Паук"ни кинотеатрда севгилиси билан кўраётган йигит воқеалар ривожини баланд овозда қизига айтиб берибди. Натижада орқада ўтирганлар бунақа спойлерларга чидолмай уни калтаклашибди. Агрессияни ҳар қандай турига тўлақонли қаршиман. Бу ҳолат — истисно.

😁122💯5❤‍🔥2

28 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC≈3,540 views131 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кинони рилсларда кўришни бас қилинглар-е барака топкурлар, “Тенет” майли, “Одиссея” ҳам қайсидир маънода майли (кастдан бошқа хейт тополмасаларинг ҳам), лекин “Дюнкерк” билан “Оппенгеймер”ни пастга шўнғиш дейиш учун одам мактабни бошланғичдан кейин ташлаб кетган бўлиш керак камида.

😁91💯18🤩9🤯8👍5

26 Jul 2026, 14:23 UTC≈3,290 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍14❤‍🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 05:56 UTC≈3,930 views80 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ноланнинг "Одиссеяси"ни кўрдим. Кристофер Ноланнинг "Одиссея"си — катта экранлардаги навбатдаги визуал ажриба. Фильм кутганимдан кучлироқ таассурот қолдирди. Хронометраж салкам уч соатни ташкил қилсада, фильмнинг ички динамикаси ва воқеалар ривожи томошабинни деярли зериктирмайди. Кастинг атрофидаги шов-шувлар ва танқидларга қўшила олмайман. Шахсан мен Гомер эпоси ёки "Троя"нинг сюжет линияларидан йироқ одам сифати

👍51❤‍🔥21💯7👎1

23 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC≈3,570 views90 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Бугун бир гуруҳ кинодрочерлар билан Ноланнинг Одиссеяси премьерасига тушамиз экан.

👍47😁38❤‍🔥5

23 Jul 2026, 06:14 UTC≈3,560 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Disclosure Day (2026) Квентин Тарантино вақтида "Режиссёрлар 60 ёшдан кейин кино олмаслиги керак, улар фақат ўзларини шарманда қилади" деганда, балки айнан Стивен Спилбергни назарда тутгандир. Бу гап қанчалик аччиқ ҳақиқат эканини Спилбергнинг янги "Фош бўлиш куни" (Disclosure Day) фильми яққол исботлаб турибди. 79 ёшли маэстро бу сафар ўзининг севимли ўзга сайёраликлари ва конспирологияси ҳақида навбатдаги "даҳшатл

💯26😁8👍3🤔1

22 Jul 2026, 16:24 UTC≈11,300 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Давление (2026) Иттифоқчилар 1944 йилнинг июнь ойи бошида Нормандияга ўз ҳарбийларини жўнатиши керак. Бу тарихдаги энг катта ҳужум бўлади, ўртада юз минглаб ҳарьийларнинг тақдир турибди. Каттаконларнинг хонасида эса тортишув — белгиланган кун ҳаво яхши бўладими ёки ёмон? Ёмон бўлса юз минглаб ҳарбийнинг ҳаёти хавф остида қолади. Натижада ҳужум кунини белгилаб бериш қўмондоннинг эмас метеорологнинг чекига тушади. Юз м

👍15❤‍🔥3

18 Jul 2026, 06:37 UTC≈4,290 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я только что посмотрел «Одиссею» в обычном зале и говорю (с)

😁70❤‍🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 06:50 UTC≈4,730 views75 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Одиссеяни нега аймаксда кўриш кераклиги ҳақида.

❤‍🔥48👍18😁9

16 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC≈4,080 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кинога тушамизми қора халқ?

👍21🤩3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @kinopub_uz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 134,943 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кинопуб” (@kinopub_uz), 3,796 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kinopub_uz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.