Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кинопереговорка ®

Channel

Кинопереговорка ®

@kinoperegovorka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

243subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003984565893
TypeChannel
Username@kinoperegovorka
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 8 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kinoperegovorka

Growth

2272432358 August 2026 — 227 subscribers8 August 2026 — 227 subscribers8 August 2026 — 228 subscribers15 August 2026 — 243 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 225–245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:56243+15
8 Aug 2026, 13:50228+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:18227no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:16227first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
94.8%
avg views ÷ 243 subscribers
Avg views / post
230
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (8 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,535
Reactions total99
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

156 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7447.4%
🔥5535.3%
👍74.49%
😁74.49%
🥰74.49%
👾21.28%
🤩21.28%
❤‍🔥10.641%
🤔10.641%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC108 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Воу-воу! Уже завтра! Если не знаете чем заняться вечером —то приходите смотреть Бугонию. Если знаете чем заняться вечером —то всё равно приходите смотреть Бугонию! Это любопытная чёрная комедия (одновременно ещё и триллер с элементами научной фантастики) про конспирологов. После фильма обсудим у кого какие есть любимые конспирологические теории 👽 ОДЕРЖИМЫЙ ТЕОРИЯМИ ЗАГОВОРА РАБОЧИЙ ТЕДДИ ПРИ ПОМОЩИ НЕ СЛИШКОМ СООБ

🔥63👾2

3 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC250 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, дорогие любители дизайна, в эту среду мы познакомимся с Иеном Спалтером, да, это он создал логотип Инсты (той, самой, что запрещена на территории РФ!) и активно работал с Nike. В этой серии он рассказывает о процессе создания цифровых продуктов, включая эксперименты, итерации и тестирование. Его поит, что дизайн — это не только эстетика, но и функциональность. Билет 100 ₽, оплата в боте Старт 19:15 (двери

5🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC174 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ловите кино-август! Итак, чего же там будет в Кинопереговорке? 🍿02.08 (вс). 18:00 Смотрим фильм, который нам покажет Даша, никто не знает что это за фильм, но билеты уже в боте 👨‍🎨05.08 (ср). 19:15 Кинопереговорка для дизайнеров. Пятая серия из второго сезона «Абстракт» — про дизайн-директора самой Инсты 😱 🍿08.08 (сб). 19:00 Смотрим «Бугонию» и разбираемся причём тут гендер фармы и конспирологи. 👨‍🎨12.08 (ср). 19

4🔥4🤩2

31 Jul 2026, 18:57 UTC156 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У меня две новости — в эту субботу кина не будет… Но будет в воскресенье! В этот раз в нашем пространстве разместится наш друг — Даша Бондарь и её проект Кинохромосома. И что самое интересное — мы будем смотреть какой-то фильм. Нет, правда, название не разглашается, по сути это формат прийти на фильм «в слепую» (думаю там будет что-то интересненькое). Так что если желаете новый экспириенс — добро пожаловать! Билеты

6🔥6😁2🤔1

28 Jul 2026, 15:06 UTC306 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В прошлую среду мы интересно обсудили концепцию одежды и того как могут выглядеть костюмы в кино. А уже в эту среду будем обсуждать работы и подход американской дизайнерки Кэс Холман. Её ключевая идея — создавать среду и объекты, которые стимулируют креативность и неструктурированную игру. Её работы не имеют жёстко заданных функций или учебных целей, они побуждают детей и взрослых самим придумывать историю предмета,

4

23 Jul 2026, 09:54 UTC256 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, в этой дикой гонке победил волчара 🐺🐺🐺 Шуток про цирк не будет, но вам придётся уолк ту зе оур синема клаб в эту субботу, ждём всех, кто голосовал и всех кто не голосовал. Билеты, как обычно в боте, стоимость — 400 ₽. До встречи! 1987 ГОД. ПОСЛЕ КРАХА ИНВЕСТИЦИОННОГО БАНКА АМБИЦИОЗНЫЙ БРОКЕР ДЖОРДАН БЕЛФОРТ ОТКРЫВАЕТ СОБСТВЕННУЮ ФИРМУ И СТРЕМИТЕЛЬНО СТАНОВИТСЯ ОДНИМ ИЗ САМЫХ УСПЕШНЫХ ИГРОКОВ УОЛЛ-СТРИТ. ОГРО

🔥42🥰2

22 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC193 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Регистрируйте бабушку в телеграме и скорей голосуйте за своего краша, которого мы посмотрим в эту субботу! (у вас ровно сутки, чтобы провернуть все схемы и накрутить голоса)

😁3

21 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTC234 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Йоу-йоу, ребяяят, это знаменитая рубрика «Киноварианты», которая проходит раз в месяц! Формат — вы накидываете в комментарии этого поста по 1 варианту фильма для просмотра в эту субботу. Завтра собираем всё в список и открываем голосование, голосование заканчивается в четверг и анонсируется фильм 😧 Успевайте написать свой вариант 👇

5🔥5👍2

19 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC394 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, гоу в среду смотреть 3-ю серию Abstract! В этот раз история про Рут Картер, знаменитую художницу по костюмам (известную, в частности, по фильму «Чёрная Пантера», уляля). После просмотра действует Полиция дизайна — разберём и прокомментим любой проект/кейс, по 1 от посетителя. Билет 100 ₽, оплата в боте Старт 19:15 (двери в 19:00) Адрес: кинопереговорка в офисе бизнес-усадьбы ЧЕКЕД и АШБЮРО — Ленина, 20,

8🔥2❤‍🔥1

19 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC240 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчерашняя встреча в переговорке прошла лампово и продуктивно — подержали настоящего льва из золота (речь совсем не про подделку от Сима-Ленда), послушали байки с Каннского фестиваля, порадовались за наших уральских креативщиков, посмотрели смешные, грустные и местами совсем не понятные ролики… Есть идейки что из подобного формата посмотреть в следующем месяце, следите за новостями 🍿

12🔥4👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kinoperegovorka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 760,916 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кинопереговорка ®” (@kinoperegovorka), 243 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kinoperegovorka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.