Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КиноКайф - Лучшие фильмы

Channel

КиноКайф - Лучшие фильмы

@kino_kaif

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

178,585subscribers

-3,560 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002354510141
TypeChannel
Username@kino_kaif
Description🍿 Новинки фильмов и сериалов 🤯 Эксклюзивные новости 🔞 Без цензуры По всем вопросам: @ru_frame Регистрация РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/676d86608e552d6b542e7c36
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 October 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/kino_kaif

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

178,585182,145180,3657 August 2026 — 182,145 subscribers8 August 2026 — 182,130 subscribers9 August 2026 — 182,085 subscribers10 August 2026 — 182,013 subscribers11 August 2026 — 181,951 subscribers12 August 2026 — 181,874 subscribers13 August 2026 — 181,805 subscribers14 August 2026 — 181,696 subscribers16 August 2026 — 181,619 subscribers17 August 2026 — 181,548 subscribers18 August 2026 — 181,491 subscribers19 August 2026 — 181,398 subscribers20 August 2026 — 181,338 subscribers21 August 2026 — 181,275 subscribers22 August 2026 — 181,181 subscribers24 August 2026 — 181,113 subscribers25 August 2026 — 181,048 subscribers26 August 2026 — 180,973 subscribers27 August 2026 — 180,892 subscribers28 August 2026 — 180,838 subscribers29 August 2026 — 180,776 subscribers30 August 2026 — 180,707 subscribers31 August 2026 — 180,636 subscribers1 September 2026 — 180,579 subscribers2 September 2026 — 180,502 subscribers4 September 2026 — 180,406 subscribers6 September 2026 — 180,285 subscribers9 September 2026 — 180,071 subscribers11 September 2026 — 179,910 subscribers13 September 2026 — 179,801 subscribers14 September 2026 — 179,717 subscribers16 September 2026 — 179,588 subscribers18 September 2026 — 179,453 subscribers25 September 2026 — 179,113 subscribers4 October 2026 — 178,585 subscribers7 August 20264 October 2026
35 measurements spanning 57 days, net -3,560. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 178,051–182,679 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Oct 2026, 00:40178,585-528
25 Sept 2026, 06:37179,113-340
18 Sept 2026, 23:41179,453-135
16 Sept 2026, 16:40179,588-129
14 Sept 2026, 23:38179,717-84
13 Sept 2026, 12:58179,801-109
11 Sept 2026, 19:15179,910-161
9 Sept 2026, 09:21180,071-214
6 Sept 2026, 01:39180,285-121
4 Sept 2026, 00:01180,406-96
2 Sept 2026, 12:09180,502-77
1 Sept 2026, 12:38180,579-57
31 Aug 2026, 14:11180,636-71
30 Aug 2026, 12:47180,707-69
29 Aug 2026, 12:23180,776-62
28 Aug 2026, 09:33180,838-54
27 Aug 2026, 11:02180,892-81
26 Aug 2026, 10:06180,973-75
25 Aug 2026, 08:42181,048-65
24 Aug 2026, 11:52181,113first reading

Engagement

268 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 125 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.93%
avg views ÷ 178,585 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,240
123 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.431%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
123
of 268 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held268 (4 August 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total643,919
Reactions total2,778
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Oct 2026, 11:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,930
Videos
≈2,540
Links
≈2,320

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 11m
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 141 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,250 reactions across 268 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,69827.2%
👍1,08517.4%
😁90114.4%
🤣75612.1%
🔥5809.28%
🤮2183.49%
👎2033.25%
🤡1562.50%
❤‍🔥751.20%
🙏711.14%
🥰691.10%
🥱470.752%
👏390.624%
🤔360.576%
💩340.544%
😱330.528%
💔230.368%
💯220.352%
🙈200.32%
🤬160.256%
23 further kinds1682.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 268 of the 268 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,250 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 268 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 268 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kino_kaif. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 268 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.12%
3 of 268 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
5,290
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,290
over 265 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzquWmHeK110 August 202610 August 2026
2W5zFGxYQU1115 September 202615 September 2026
2W5zFHDCrtR127 August 202627 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 268 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

6 Oct 2026, 10:10 UTC899 views4 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Video

Вашему вниманию лучший косплей на Наруто. Мы теперь и в 📲 MAX

👍3🔥1

6 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC≈2,070 views14 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

Шикарная фантастика на вечер с Энн Хэтэуэй 💣💥 На краю Оук-стрит (2026) 16+ Жанр: фантастика, боевик, приключения ⭐️ Рейтинг: 6.2 Июль 1982 года. Семейство Платт живёт в пригороде. Однажды в их тихом районе начинают происходить странные явления: по ночам что-то гремит и вспыхивает, во дворе у соседки вырастает причудливое растение, во дворе у соседа — огромная куча экскрементов. Потом случается блэкаут, и, проснувши…

🔥10👎4

5 Oct 2026, 15:35 UTC≈4,050 views9 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

«Диггер» — один из крупнейших кассовых провалов в карьере Тома Круза. За первые выходные фильм собрал лишь $8 млн в США и $20 млн по миру. С таким стартом новая лента Алехандро Гонсалеса Иньярриту может стать одним из крупнейших кассовых провалов года. При бюджете картины в $160–180 млн плюс $100 млн на маркетинг эксперты прогнозируют Warner Bros убытки в $150-200 млн. Мы теперь и в 📲 MAX

❤5😁3😨1

5 Oct 2026, 12:33 UTC≈4,430 views12 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

«Мстители: Финал» снова самый кассовый фильм в истории. Переиздание помогло кинокомиксу обойти «Аватара» — мировые сборы достигли $2,92 млрд. Перевыпуск принёс более $120 млн. Мы теперь и в 📲 MAX

🤔8❤4

5 Oct 2026, 10:25 UTC≈4,530 views29 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

Новые фоточки Сидни Суини для бренда Syrn. Мы теперь и в 📲 MAX

🤡13👀10🥱3❤1🔥1🥴1

4 Oct 2026, 15:34 UTC≈5,620 views32 reactions1 Starread 6 October 2026
Photo

Уиллеф Дефо поведал, что любит укладывать своих животных спать (у актёра есть своя ферма): «Есть что-то прекрасное в том, как они видят меня. 35 коз и овец несутся на меня галопом, чтобы я открыл дверь в их маленькое место для сна». Он просто живёт свою лучшую жизнь. Мы теперь и в 📲 MAX

👍20❤9❤‍🔥3

4 Oct 2026, 12:25 UTC≈5,420 views21 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Video

«Сумерки» 2008 года — самый кассовый фильм месяца в российском прокате со сборами в 340 млн рублей. Впервые в истории старый фильм обошёл все российские новинки — фанатки «Сумерек» постарались. Полное хоа-хоа-хоа. Мы теперь и в 📲 MAX

❤12🤣6🤮2🔥1

4 Oct 2026, 10:20 UTC≈4,960 views24 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Video

«Властелин колец», но действие происходит в США. Мы теперь и в 📲 MAX

🤣15🔥5👎2❤1💊1

4 Oct 2026, 07:15 UTC≈5,260 views7 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

Марвел подарил нам шикарный фильм! Рекомендую 😎🔥 Фантастическая четвёрка: Первые шаги (2025) 16+ Жанр: фантастика, боевик, приключения ⭐️ Рейтинг: 6.8 Рид Ричардс, Бен Гримм, Сью Сторм и её брат Джонни должны защитить Землю от космического бога Галактуса и его приспешника — Серебряного Сёрфера. И если план Галактуса поглотить всю планету и всех её жителей кажется недостаточно ужасающим, ситуация внезапно становится…

❤6👎1

3 Oct 2026, 15:35 UTC≈5,400 views35 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Photo

🔥 Фанаты требуют взять сына Гари Олдмана на роль Сириуса Блэка в новом сериале от HBO! Поклонники «Гарри Поттера» активно продвигают модель и актера Чарли Олдмана, который невероятно похож на своего знаменитого отца в молодости и обладает той же бунтарской харизмой. В отличие от оригинальных фильмов, где актеры были сильно старше своих персонажей, возраст Чарли идеально подходит под книжный канон: в момент побега и…

👍27❤6👎1💋1

3 Oct 2026, 12:33 UTC≈5,170 views24 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Video

Давненько Сидни не постил вам — непорядок, надо исправлять. Мы теперь и в 📲 MAX

❤10💋8🤮5🥱1

3 Oct 2026, 10:25 UTC≈5,140 views18 reactionsread 6 October 2026
Video

Просто Роберт Паттинсон, разбирающий матрёшку со своими фотографиями. Мы теперь и в 📲 MAX

❤8😁8🔥1🥱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 268 posts we hold for @kino_kaif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КиноКайф - Лучшие фильмы” (@kino_kaif), 178,585 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kino_kaif.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.