Channel
@kingwoma
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,402subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001005713061 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kingwoma |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kingwoma |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 4,402 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 4,408 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 4,415 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 4,417 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 4,417 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 24 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (24 April 2025 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 70.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 30.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇸🇦عقاارات وكار المملكة 🇸🇦 https://t.me/aagar35 ———— @amal3_34جمالك انثوي معي @aagar35 🏡 عقارات المملكه ~~ ⑮k ➺حب يلامس النجوم ❀ ⑩k ➺طـبـيـبـك الـشـخـصـي ❀ ⑨k ➺فيديوهات اسلاميه مؤثرة ❀ ⑨k ➺ روائــــــ الــحــب ــــع ❀ ⑧k ➺حلم طفلة ❀ ⑧k ➺فنون القيادة الناجحة ❀ ⑦k ➺طبخات ولا أسهل ❀ ⑦k ➺ الــجـراحــة والــطــب ❀ ⑥k ➺قصص حجا و ابو نواس ❀ ⑥k ➺خواطر للواتسآب ❀ ⑤k ➺طور نفسك و ذاتك ❀ ⑤k …
@amal3_34 خليك انثى ناعمه معي ♥️ @iherbshroog الصيدلية الامريكية @faebo77 قروب خاص لنشر القرآن - شفافه غير مثبتة🔚 👇🏻💰 لدعايه والاعلان @abobasil111
»🔹لستة ابو باسل الشهيرة🔹« @amal3_34 قروب للنساء فقط 🚫 @iherbshroog الصيدلية الامريكية💚 @faebo77 قروب خاص لنشر القرآن -🔹- ⚜@abobasil111 لدعاية والاعلان💰
🇸🇦عقاارات وكار المملكة 🇸🇦 https://t.me/aagar35 ———— @amal3_34جمالك انثوي معي @aagar35 🏡 عقارات المملكه ~~ ⑯k ➺ حِكَم وَأقوال ❀ ⑮k ➺حب يلامس النجوم ❀ ⑭k ➺ دورات نسائية ❀ ⑫k ➺ سـت البـيـت ❀ ⑨k ➺ روائــــــ الــحــب ــــع ❀ ⑨k ➺حب ٌو رومنسيَات ❀ ⑧k ➺حلم طفلة ❀ ⑧k ➺حب علي قائمة الانتظار ❀ ⑦k ➺ الــجـراحــة والــطــب ❀ ⑦k ➺ حققي احلامك ❀ ⑤k ➺ الطـبـيــة الـتـعـلـيمية ❀ ④k ➺قناه للقر…
🇸🇦عقاارات وكار المملكة 🇸🇦 https://t.me/aagar35 ———— @amal3_34جمالك انثوي معي @aagar35 🏡 عقارات المملكه ~~ ⑥⑦k ➺فيديوهات وصور رومنسيه ❀ ⑤⑦k ➺اقوال وحكم عظيمة ❀ ③③k ➺بوح الأصدقاء ❀ ⑯k ➺كن أنت المعجزة ❀ ⑬k ➺مًعٌنِى أّلَحًيِّأّةّ ❀ ⑫k ➺سـت البـيـت ❀ ⑨k ➺حكاية صورة ❀ ⑨k ➺تَـطــ ــوير آلَذِآتٌـ ❀ ⑨k ➺حب ٌو رومنسيَات ❀ ⑧k ➺بيت حواء منووعات ❀ ⑧k ➺ناشيونال جرافيك ❀ ⑦k ➺|تثبيت طب اﻷعشاب ❀…
@amal3_34 خليك انثى ناعمه معي ♥️ @iherbshroog الصيدلية الامريكية @faebo77 قروب خاص لنشر القرآن - شفافه غير مثبتة🔚 👇🏻💰 لدعايه والاعلان @abobasil111
أظهرت دراسة حديثة أن الأزواج الذين ينعمون بعلاقات مستقرة وسعيدة يميلون إلى عدم مشاركة تفاصيل حياتهم العاطفية على وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي. وبيّنت النتائج أن الرضا الحقيقي بين الشريكين يُبنى داخل العلاقة نفسها، لا في الفضاء الرقمي، وأن الأزواج الأكثر انسجاماً يفضّلون الحفاظ على خصوصيتهم بعيداً عن أعين المتابعين. كما أوضحت الدراسة أن الإفراط في نشر الصور والمنشورات المتعلقة بالعلاقة قد يكون في بعض الحالات محاولة لتعويض …
👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
طلاقكِ وانطلاقكِ ♦️ نعم انطلقي نحو تشتيت عائلتكِ، ♦️ انطلقي نحو رمي أبنائكِ إلى الشارع، ♦️ انطلقي نحو ضياعكِ في المجهول، ♦️ انطلقي نحو ضياع مستقبل أبنائكِ، ♦️ انطلقي نحو فكّ الكلاب وأنياب الذئاب، ♦️ انطلقي نحو جوعكِ وفقدان مشاعركِ، ♦️ انطلقي نحو ضياع كيانكِ، ♦️ انطلقي لخدمة زوجات إخوانكِ، ♦️ انطلقي لتحمُّل الغيبة والنميمة والطعن بشرفكِ، ♦️ انطلقي نحو الحسرة والألم عندما تشاهدين حبّ الأزواج لبعضهم وأنتِ كالبومة وحدكِ…
Photo, posted without a caption
حقيقة أن أطفال التوحد هم أبطال حقيقيين يقاوموا ويحاولوا يعيشوا مثلنا ولكن مايقدروا للأسف، لذلك يجب علينا مساعدتهم فقط وفهم رغباتهم واحتياجاتهم
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kingwoma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 708,642 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kingwoma named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“👸سـت البـيت🏡” (@kingwoma), 4,402 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kingwoma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.