جونگین واقعا خداس. ،خدای دنس و کی پاپ☝🏻 ────₊‧.°.⋆🧸🤎•˚₊‧⋆────── ᨳ𓂃𓈒 ᨳ𓂃𓈒 @Kimjongin88ir
🔥3👍1

Channel
@kimjongin88ir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
545subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001918521594 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kimjongin88ir |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kimjongin88ir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 545 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 545 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 570 |
| Reactions total | 130 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
130 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 62 | 47.7% | |
| ❤ | 38 | 29.2% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 15.4% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.08% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 2.31% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.54% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.769% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
جونگین واقعا خداس. ،خدای دنس و کی پاپ☝🏻 ────₊‧.°.⋆🧸🤎•˚₊‧⋆────── ᨳ𓂃𓈒 ᨳ𓂃𓈒 @Kimjongin88ir
🔥3👍1
ˋˏ واو ˎˊ داشتم فکر میکردم واقعاً انگار یه خداست، بعد یادم افتاد که واقعاً هم لقب معروفش اینه که: «کای خداست»😭
🔥3
بچهها لطفا به پستهایی که میذاریم ریکشن بدید و اگه دوست داشتید کامنت بذارید اینطوری ما میفهمیم چه محتوایی رو بیشتر خوشتون میاد 🫶🏻
😭15👍1
اینجا هم جونگین از تماشاچیا میپرسه واسه شام چی بخوره بهش غذا پیشنهاد بدن و ما دخترایی رو داریم که داد میزنن "بیا خونهی من" "بیا بریم خونهی ما"😂😂😂 . ────₊‧.°.⋆🧸🤎•˚₊‧⋆────── ᨳ𓂃𓈒 ᨳ𓂃𓈒 @Kimjongin88ir
❤18😁4
این مورد هم جالب بود دیدم چندین نفر دیگه از کسایی که واتربمب رفتن بهش اشاره کردن خیلی سخت بوده اجراهای سولو آرتیستای دیگه رو دید چون دنسراشون مدام روی تماشاچیا آب میپاشیدن ولی استیج کای همچین چیزی نبوده و دنسرا آب نپاشیدین من حتی ندیدم تو فنکما که خود جونگین هم آب بپاشه . مطمئنم که این کار خواستهی خود جونگین بوده چون میدونسته خیلی از فنا فقط واسه دیدن جونگین و استیجش اونجا هستن نه واسه آب بازی جنتلمن و همه چی تمو…
❤17💘3
حالا یه نفر دیگه هم اومده پست بالایی رو کوت کرده و نوشته : حتی دیگه کسی تفنگ آبپاش هم نمیزد و جو کلاً داشت میمُرد. تماشاگرها همگی دیگه علاقهشون رو از دست داده بودن و همینطوری سرسری، بیحال و بدون هیجان فستیوال رو تماشا میکردن؛ اما همین که کای اومد روی استیج، یهو همه چشمهاشون گرد شد، شروع کردن به جیغ زدن و همگی گوشیهاشون رو درآوردن و کلاً جمعیت منفجر شد... 😂 (یه مرد که پشت سرم بود، همین که کای رو دید مدام از ش…
😭18🆒1
مورد بعدی هم پست این گوم کرهایه که دیروز واتربمب رفته . چیزی که واقعاً خیلی خندهدار بود اینه که... قبل از اینکه کای اوپا بیاد روی استیج، وقتی گفته میشد با تفنگ آبپاش آب بپاشین و تشویق کنین، هیچکس اصلاً آبپاشی نمیکرد. منم با خودم گفتم خب، لابد بقیه تفنگ آبپاش همراهشون نیاوردن. ولی به محض اینکه کای اوپا اومد و گفت با تفنگهای آبپاشتون بهم آب بپاشین، یهو از اینور و اونور و همهجا کلی تفنگ آبپاش بیرون اومد و او…
😭11🔥2
یه پست تو ایکس داره وایرال میشه که نگم😂😂 وقتی جونگین با پیراهن باز روی استیج راه میرفت یه کاپل بین جمعیت بودن ( داخل ویدیو با فلش مشخص کردم ) که پسره سر دختره رو میچرخونه نگاهش به بدن جونگین نیوفته😂😂 حق داری داداش درکت میکنم منم بودم حسودیم میشد نمیذاشتم دوس دخترم به این مجسمه نگاه کنه🤭🤭 . ────₊‧.°.⋆🧸🤎•˚₊‧⋆────── ᨳ𓂃𓈒 ᨳ𓂃𓈒 @Kimjongin88ir
😭15
بیاید چند تا توییت از کیگوما که رفتن واتربمب و چیزایی که تعریف کردن بذارم
❤3
هیچکی مووان نکرده ، هنوز اپدیت میاد😭
🔥12😭3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kimjongin88ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 499,187 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝚂𝚞𝚗 𝙺𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝙱𝚘𝚢🧸” (@kimjongin88ir), 545 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kimjongin88ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.