Channel
@kiki321322
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5,125subscribers
+124 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002521524680 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kiki321322 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kiki321322 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 5,125 | +63 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 5,062 | +42 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 5,020 | +19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 5,001 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 5,001 | first reading |
66 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 66 (7 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,770 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 87.5% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 6.25% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#出击大队报告模板 📄【老师体验报告】 【老师花名】：#知夏 【课室位置】：#江北 【上课费用】：Pp 【出击时间】：8月11日 【人照几分】：8.5 【身高身材】：身材匀称白嫩 【沟通态度】：很健谈 【项目细节】：课本上的都有 【是否超时】：🈚️ 【卫生环境】：干净卫生 【自由评论】：69，🐍，口爆情绪价值爆棚 🧾 综合评价：五星 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️极品 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️优秀 ⭐️⭐️⭐️良好o ⭐️⭐️一般 ⭐️差评 🅰️ 学生留名：知名导演 🅱️ 老师联系：@zhixia688 📎 标签：#初次体验 #回头客 #套餐券 #环境好 #无雷点 #报告
#出击大队报告模板 📄【老师体验报告】 【老师花名】：#元媛 【课室位置】：#河南岸 【上课费用】：500p 【出击时间】：8.11 【人照几分】：10 【身高身材】：10 【沟通态度】：态度很好 【项目细节】：口、🐍、课表上的都有 【是否超时】：否 【卫生环境】：干净、酒店级别 【自由评论】：第一次找元媛老师感觉可以，口的很好、挺会🐍的，人也长的好美小巧玲珑的、很瘦、很配合，很温柔，皮肤很滑。🐻手感超级好，越摸越舒服，下次还想摸，下次再来，五星好评，值得推荐 🧾 综合评价：优秀 【⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️推荐】 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️优秀 ⭐️⭐️⭐️良好 ⭐️⭐️一般 ⭐️差评 🅰️ 学生留名：2 🅱️ 老师链接：@Zhuanyunmei168 📎 标签：#初次体验 #回头客 #套餐券 #环境好 #无雷点 #报告
#出击大队报告模板 📄【老师体验报告】 【老师花名】： 冰冰 @Sunny_45322 【课室位置】：港惠 【上课费用】：800P 【出击时间】：8-11 【人照几分】: 8 分 【身高身材】: 168 【沟通态度】：很好 【项目细节】: 玩法多 【是否超时】： 否 【卫生环境】： 日租公寓 【自由评论】： 一进门就看到老师良家御姐型，老师态度很好很贴心，交水费后老师很讲卫生，胸型很好，光滑。 服务很好，玩法很多，360度口吹，口活好，舌头灵活，大蟒蛇。一边做一边蛇，老师很骚，会自己揉着奶子，下面紧，会夹。 强烈推荐 🧾 综合评价：⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🅰️ 学生留名： Rex 🅱️ 老师链接：@Sunny_45322 📎 标签：#多次体验 #环境好 #报告 #无雷点
老师花名】：云汐 【课室位置】：＃港惠 【上课费用】：700 【出击时间】：8.10 【人照几分】：8 【身高身材】：9 【沟通态度】：挺不错的 【项目细节】：课程表都有 【是否超时】：没有 【卫生环境】：干净 【自由评论】：最近很久没玩了，趁着上班事情不多联系了云汐老师，老师正好有时间，于是偷溜出来打车前往，到地方指挥上楼是公寓类型教室，步入正题，刚进门眼睛就被老师身前两对大白兔吸引住了，老师身材特别好，老师的脸庞，画着淡妆可以看得出来底子很好，有种邻家大姐姐的感觉，跟频道照片区别不大，频道稍微磨了一下皮。洗完澡老师拿着一次性浴巾帮忙擦干，趴床上享受B面服务，老师一脱衣服两只大白兔跳脱出来，太顶了挺拔圆润，不是那种塌塌的八字奶，在我见过的🐻中排的上夯中夯，一套吸皮指划🐻划都没毛病，然后是重点毒🐉，老师像是是真的舔，还会用舌头使劲往里顶，给我顶的有点害羞了哈哈哈，另外反吊也不得不说两句，太爽了，一手搓着🥚，老师头从胯下含着🐔儿，…
#出击大队报告模板 📄【老师体验报告】 【老师花名】： #元媛 【课室位置】：#河南岸 【上课费用】：500p 【出击时间】：8.11 【人照几分】：10 【身高身材】：160 【沟通态度】：好 【项目细节】：口，🐍，课表上的都有 【是否超时】：否 【卫生环境】：酒店级别 【自由评论】：够嫩年纪小，喜欢嫩的可以来、十分推荐，五星好评、还会来的 🧾 综合评价： ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️优秀 🅰️ 学生留名：hz 🅱️ 老师链接： @Zhuanyunmei168 📎 标签：#初次体验 #回头客 #套餐券 #环境好 #无雷点 #报告
#出击大队报告模板 📄【老师体验报告】 【老师花名】：#元媛 【课室位置】：#河南岸 【上课费用】：500p 【出击时间】：8.11 【人照几分】：10 【身高身材】：160 【沟通态度】：很热情，好 【项目细节】：口，🐍，课表上的全都有 【是否超时】：无 【卫生环境】：干净整洁，酒店级别 【自由评论】：从来没有写过评价，元媛老师我真的喜欢，，第一次写评价，qq和老师打完电话，后面就直接过来，颜值很不错，态度很热情，身材瘦瘦的，服务很到位，口的特别的舒服，搞得我的小鸡🐔受不了，体验感很好，五星好评，下次还来，省略800字…… 🧾 综合评价：5克星 【⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️推荐】 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️优秀 ⭐️⭐️⭐️良好 ⭐️⭐️一般 ⭐️差评 🅰️ 学生留名：匿名 🅱️ 老师链接：@Zhuanyunmei168 📎 标签：#初次体验 #环境好 #无雷点 #报告
#出击大队报告模板 📄【老师体验报告】 【老师花名】：#奶魅 【课室位置】：#江北 【上课费用】：6p 【出击时间】：8.11 【人照几分】：10 【身高身材】：10 【沟通态度】：9 【项目细节】：9 【是否超时】：否 【卫生环境】：干净 【自由评论】： 老师很热情，颜值身材很好第一次来口活很棒，技术很好。服务很好， 🧾 综合评价： 【⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️推荐】 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️优秀 ⭐️⭐️⭐️良好 ⭐️⭐️一般 ⭐️差评 🅰️ 学生留名：阿根廷 🅱️ 老师链接：@https://t.me/+AbC8Lemtlu80OWVk 📎 标签：#初次体验 #回头客 #套餐券 #环境好 #无雷点 #报告
❤1
#出击大队报告模板 📄【老师体验报告】 【老师花名】：#gg 【课室位置】：#河南岸 【上课费用】：2400包夜 【出击时间】：8.9 【人照几分】：8分 【身高身材】：9分 【沟通态度】：态度很好 【项目细节】：无套口，女上男下 【是否超时】：未超时 【卫生环境】：干净 【自由评论】：第一次包夜，感觉可以，没啥文采，上完班就过去包夜了，整个人没精神，就早早缴械了，后面休息闲聊了一下，睡觉醒来再做了一遍服务，挺好的 🧾 综合评价：优秀 【⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️推荐】 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️优秀 ⭐️⭐️⭐️良好 ⭐️⭐️一般 ⭐️差评 🅰️ 学生留名：肥宅喝肥宅快乐水 🅱️ 老师链接：@GG520a 📎 标签：#初次体验 #回头客 #套餐券 #环境好 #无雷点 #报告
#出击大队报告模板 📄【老师体验报告】 【老师花名】：#兮兮 【课室位置】：#江北 【上课费用】：600 【出击时间】：8月11 【人照几分】：9 【身高身材】：160 【沟通态度】：态度好 【项目细节】：课表 【是否超时】：否 【卫生环境】：干净 【自由评论】:跟老师聊了2天，今天终于去了本来是约头课的，无奈老师头课被订，下午去的第二场，老师很有趣性格好，见面真人比照片漂亮，健谈，老师和我聊了一会天就开始了，先帮忙洗澡，后面我躺下享受服务，老师口技了得，差点就交代了，然后带上小雨伞开始战斗，换了2 3个姿势最后后入交代。 🧾 综合评价：优秀 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️极品 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️优秀 ⭐️⭐️⭐️良好 ⭐️⭐️一般 ⭐️差评 🅰️ 学生留名：小鸡鸡 🅱️ 老师联系：@cixiao00 📎 标签：#初次体验 #回头客 #套餐券 #环境好 #无雷点 #报告
❤1
#出击大队报告模板 📄【老师体验报告】 【老师花名】：#CC 【课室位置】：#金山湖 【上课费用】：p 【出击时间】：8.10 【人照几分】：8 【身高身材】：1.63 c 【沟通态度】：很热情，不尴尬 【项目细节】：课表全都有 【是否超时】：无 【卫生环境】：大，干净整洁 【自由评论】：首先颜值是比较舒服的，态度很热情，身材稍微有点肉少妇型，战衣多，服务全面且到位，从陪洗澡就开始发骚，各种骚，变着花样骚，体验感很好 🧾 综合评价：4星半 【⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️推荐】 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️优秀 ⭐️⭐️⭐️良好 ⭐️⭐️一般 ⭐️差评 🅰️ 学生留名：aser 🅱️ 老师链接：@CC520dabomei 📎 标签：#初次体验 #环境好 #无雷点 #报告
#出击大队报告模板 📄【老师体验报告】 【老师花名】：#三三 【课室位置】：#港惠 【上课费用】：500 【出击时间】：8/10 【人照几分】：8 【身高身材】：8 【沟通态度】：好 【项目细节】：都有 【是否超时】：否 【卫生环境】：好 【自由评论】：必须出击啊，说话声音好听，会主动调情，帮你洗漱 🧾 综合评价： ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️优秀 🅰️ 学生留名：坟头造型师 🅱️ 老师链接：@Xiao_San13331
#出击大队报告模板 📄【老师体验报告】 【老师花名】： #丹丹 【课室位置】：#惠州 【上课费用】：600 【出击时间】：8月10日 【人照几分】：9 【身高身材】：一米六 【沟通态度】：态度很好，到了之后嘘寒问暖，给拿水 【项目细节】：课表皆有 【是否超时】：123不可能超时 【卫生环境】：很干净 【自由评论】： 熟客了，她说没化妆，素颜我觉得也很好。骚，叫我干死她，还是被秒了。我一定会回来的 🧾 综合评价： ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️推荐 🅰️ 学生留名：小马 🅱️ 老师链接： @aini12aa 📎 标签：#初次体验 #回头客 #套餐券 #环境好 #无雷点 #报告
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @kiki321322. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 23,550 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kiki321322 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❤️🔥惠州出击群报告❤️🔥” (@kiki321322), 5,125 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kiki321322.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.