Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kiella | Byler endgame

Channel

Kiella | Byler endgame

@kiella_byler

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

794subscribers

+77 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003524183719
TypeChannel
Username@kiella_byler
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/kiella_byler

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

717794755.57 August 2026 — 717 subscribers8 August 2026 — 717 subscribers14 August 2026 — 720 subscribers22 August 2026 — 747 subscribers28 August 2026 — 754 subscribers5 September 2026 — 764 subscribers12 September 2026 — 766 subscribers26 September 2026 — 778 subscribers6 October 2026 — 794 subscribers7 August 20266 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 60 days, net +77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 705–806 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 17:39794+16
26 Sept 2026, 00:00778+12
12 Sept 2026, 23:37766+2
5 Sept 2026, 13:18764+10
28 Aug 2026, 14:34754+7
22 Aug 2026, 10:36747+27
14 Aug 2026, 07:37720+3
8 Aug 2026, 02:16717no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:17717first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

518 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤41179.3%
❤‍🔥366.95%
🔥295.60%
🙏295.60%
😭50.965%
💔40.772%
💋20.386%
🤝20.386%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 518 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC383 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На всякий случай: Зеркальные даты все еще РАБОЧИЕ! На них все еще достаточно много указаний, и для нетфликса они все еще выигрышные НО🙏 Нельзя все ставить на одну дату, — а то не дай бог 27-го ноября мы с вами будем растеряны, напуганы и кто-то еще белив потеряет Поэтому лучше заранее рассмотреть ВСЕ варианты, чтобы не паниковать и вовремя переключиться

❤53🙏8🤝2

4 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,490 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026

АНОНС, АНОНС, АНОНС ...до этого я говорила исключительно про одиннадцатую годовщину (поскольку сочла ее крайней точкой кфгейт, дальше которой уже никак не сдвинуться), — но дата анонса тоже напрашивается буквально сама. Итак, анонс пятого сезона был 28 апреля, за СЕМЬ месяцев до выхода, а полноценная презетация — 31 мая, на тудуме✨️✨️ Well, 7 января идеально вписывается в тайминг- ● Мы прекрасно знаем, что САМ НЕТ…

❤41🙏16🔥8💔3😭3

4 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC≈1,370 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ДАТЫ ДАТЫ ДАТЫ ДАТЫ ...много думаю сейчас о датах :') Есть несколько способов, как они могут разыграть анонс шестого сезона: Например (менее вероятный) > выпустить 10 августа трейлер баек, в котором чётко проговаривается, что персонажи в Камазотце Тем самым они всполошат и кфгейт, и небеливеров -> позволят волне шума собраться самой, как оно было в самом начале > затем выпустить анонс впритык к зеркальным датам…

❤39🔥10🙏5😭2💔1

25 Jul 2026, 20:07 UTC805 views114 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я прощаю существование бокса и выход блю-рея хотя бы за эти две фотографии🤲 Как я поняла, это из официального мерча к нему

❤80❤‍🔥23🔥11

25 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC≈2,540 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤37❤‍🔥3

25 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC≈2,310 views56 reactionsread 8 August 2026

БЛЮ-РЕЙ НИКОЛЬКО НЕ УГРОЖАЕТ ВЫХОДУ ШЕСТОГО СЕЗОНА Незаметно у нас подобрались 27 и 28 июля, а вместе с этими датами — выход блю-рея🙏 Для начала хочу отметить, что в блю-рей никто шестой сезон класть точно не будет. В черной коробочке официально заявлен МЕРЧ, и замена его на что-то другое как раз и будет нарушением юридических обещаний Более того: выпускать новый контент в блю-рее для нетфликса — огромная потеря де…

❤47❤‍🔥7💋2

23 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC681 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

О шутке Дафферов про s6 и Ноа

❤34

23 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC655 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Про смерти в шестом сезоне * Уточню: Лукаса могут убить, если у Макс будет крепкая опора в лице другого близкого человека, не обязательно романтическая

❤36

23 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC533 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Мои ожидания о шестом сезоне (Спойлер: дайте Майк-нации полноценный пов Майка😭) ● О том, как Майк может осознать, что не на своем месте ● О Карлтоне ● Мои короткие хэды🤲 Upd: забыла сказать, что очень жду ветку крилби!!

❤40❤‍🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kiella_byler. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kiella | Byler endgame” (@kiella_byler), 794 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kiella_byler.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.