یک موفقیت علمی ارزشمند دیگر در حوزه علوم اعصاب! تبریک به دکتر کیارش سادات رفیعی، دکتر اسدی انار و تیم پژوهشی نوروویا به مناسبت پذیرش و انتشار مقالهای ارزشمند در ژورنال بینالمللی Brain and Cognition از انتشارات Elsevier، در رده Q1. 📚 عنوان مقاله: Medial Prefrontal Evidence Weighting in Self-Belief Revision and Self-Continuity 🧠 این پژوهش با تمرکز بر نقش قشر پیشپیشانی میانی (mPFC)، به بررسی سازوکارهای عصبی باز…

Channel
Kiarash sadat rafiei | کیارش سادات رفیعی
@kiarashsadatrafiei
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,097subscribers
-4,059 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001556955030 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kiarashsadatrafiei |
| Description | Space, Time and Consciousness 🌌 درباره من: https://t.me/kiarashsadatrafiei/280 ارتباط ناشناس: https://t.me/HarfChatBot?start=d4f66e2b73f3 اینستاگرام: Instagram.com/Kiarashrafieii |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kiarashsadatrafiei |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 07:06 | 14,097 | -8 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:17 | 14,105 | -21 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:25 | 14,126 | -13 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:27 | 14,139 | -20 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:00 | 14,159 | -47 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:09 | 14,206 | -31 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:20 | 14,237 | -57 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 14,294 | -60 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 14,354 | -39 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:56 | 14,393 | -60 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:01 | 14,453 | -65 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:59 | 14,518 | -49 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:55 | 14,567 | -111 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 14,678 | -110 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 14,788 | -126 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:16 | 14,914 | -140 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 12:18 | 15,054 | -23 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:09 | 15,077 | -19 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:55 | 15,096 | -11 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:17 | 15,107 | first reading |
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.5%
- avg views ÷ 14,097 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,190
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (25 May 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 6,569 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 18:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 434
- Videos
- 18
- Links
- 47
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 51m 16s
- Average length
- 51m 16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
تبریک به دکتر سادات رفیعی و تیم نوروویا بابت اکسپت مقاله ای بسیار با کیفیت در ژورنال Brain and Cognition Q1 و از پروژه های ric ❤️ جهت اطلاع از دوره های منتورینگ و آموزشی مقاله نویسی: @zistkiaadmin @zistkiaadmin @Neurovia_ins
KIA COACHING | CHAPTER III Science. Business. Future. فصل سوم کوچینگ KIA در راهه! این بار، قرار نیست فقط چیزهای جدیدی یاد بگیریم... قراره آدمهای جدیدی بشناسیم، ارتباطات ارزشمندی بسازیم و در کنار افرادی با علایق مشترک، فرصتهای تازهای برای همکاری پیدا کنیم. از علم، پژوهش و مقالهنویسی تا کسبوکار، اقتصاد، هوش مصنوعی و آینده حرفهای. فصل سوم با ساختاری متفاوت برگزار میشه؛ ترکیبی از آموزشهای تخصصی، گروهبندی بر …
۲۵ سال پیش، خیلیها معتقد بودند نام Henri Kagan باید بین برندگان نوبل شیمی باشد؛ اما نبود. امروز، در ۹۵ سالگی، بالاخره نوبل شیمی را گرفت. Henri Kagan و Kenso Soai برندگان نوبل شیمی ۲۰۲۶ شدند؛ برای پژوهشهایی درباره اثرات غیرخطی و اتوکاتالیز در سنتز آلی نامتقارن. اما جذابیت علمی ماجرا حتی از داستان نوبل هم بیشتر است. بعضی مولکولها درست مثل دستهای ما، دو فرم آینهای دارند. این دو فرم ممکن است ظاهراً بسیار شبیه با…
گاهی برای فهم جهان، کافی نیست فقط به نوری که از آن میرسد نگاه کنیم. بعضی از مهمترین پیامهای کیهان، اصلاً با نور منتقل نمیشوند. نوترینوها از گریزانترین ذرات شناختهشدهاند؛ ذراتی بسیار سبک و فوقالعاده کمبرهمکنش که میتوانند از دل خشنترین پدیدههای کیهانی عبور کنند و تقریباً بدون مزاحمت، خود را به ما برسانند. همین ویژگی، آنها را هم ارزشمند میکند و هم دیدنشان را بسیار دشوار. اینجاست که ایدهای واقعاً شگفتانگ…
یکی از مهمترین ابزارهای نوروساینس مدرن، از جایی شروع شد که شاید هیچکس انتظارش را نداشت: یک جلبک تکسلولی. Peter Hegemann و Georg Nagel با مطالعهی Chlamydomonas، پروتئینهای حساس به نوری را شناسایی کردند که امروز آنها را با نام channelrhodopsin میشناسیم؛ کانالهایی که با نور فعال میشوند و میتوانند جریان یونی در غشای سلول ایجاد کنند. بعد، Karl Deisseroth این ایده را وارد نوروساینس کرد. با بیان channelrhodopsin د…
⬅️ چند سخن مهم در باب سردرگمی دانشجویان و آینده! 🔘 میدونم حقشما این شرایط نیست، اما چه باید کرد؟ @Kiacoaching
یکی از عجیبترین کیسهای نورولوژی چند سال اخیر! مردی که صورت تمام آدمها را شبیه شیطان میدید! مردی ۵۸ ساله با شکایتی غیرمعمول به پژوهشگران مراجعه کرد. نزدیک به سه سال بود که چهره تمام افرادی که میدید، بهشدت تغییر شکل پیدا میکرد. چشمها و اجزای صورت کشیده میشدند و شیارهای عمیقی روی پیشانی، گونهها و چانه ظاهر میشدند. بااینحال، خانهها، ماشینها و سایر اشیای اطراف کاملاً طبیعی بودند. او حتی با وجود این تغییرش…
خانم ۲۵ سالهای با سردرد، تهوع، حساسیت به نور، تغییر واضح رفتار و دو حمله تشنج تونیک–کلونیک (Generalized tonic–clonic seizure) مراجعه میکند. نکته عجیب این بود که MRI مغز طبیعی بود و نوار مغز اولیه هم یافته مشخصی نداشت. چند روز بعد وضعیت بیمار بدتر شد؛ روانپریشی (Psychosis)، اختلال عملکرد خودکار (Dysautonomia) و تشنجهای شدیدتر ظاهر شدند. در نوار مغز مداوم، الگوی برس دلتای شدید (Extreme Delta Brush) دیده شد؛ الگوی…
کمیته آموزش نشنال ایفسا برگزار می کند: «گفت پزشکی بخون، هنر رو بذار کنار... گفتم نه! هنر رو وارد علم پزشکی میکنم!» 🧠🎨 وقتی به یک تابلوی نقاشی خیره میشویم یا غرق در یک قطعه موسیقی میشویم، دقیقاً در ذهن و مغز ما چه اتفاقی میافتد؟ 🎼🖼️ چطور مغز انسان از میان آشفتگیِ رنگها، صداها و الگوها، یک «تجربهٔ حسی منسجم و عمیق» خلق میکند؟ 🤔💭 شاید مرز میان علم و هنر خیلی کمتر از چیزی باشه که همیشه تصور میکردیم! 🔬✨ در این …
و این هم اکسپت مقاله بنیادی، اصیل و حرفه توسط من و دکتر اسدی انار در معتبر ترین ژورنال در حیطه بین رشته ای Humanities و زیر شاخه ی Nature portfolio: Nature humanities and social sciences communications 🔥🔥🔥 این مقاله حدود ۱.۵ سال تا اکسپت طول کشید و ۷ راند داوری و ریوایز خورد، اما در نهایت اکسپت شد! مقالات جدی، بنیادی و سنگین همیشه مسیر طولانی ای تا اکسپت ممکنه داشته باشن، اما آنچه که بدست میارید فراتر از این حرفا…
پستی بسیار مهم و پاسخ به چند سوال پر تکرار! جهت اطلاع از پروژه ها و دوره ها: @zistkiaadmin @zistkiaadmin @neurovia_ins
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @kiarashsadatrafiei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@zist_kia · 725
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
@Charandiijaat · 142,167
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@Medicine_stu · 189,124
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
@konkoor_tweett · 50,618
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@Animation_Medical · 116,432
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@hanifaziimii · 76,727
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
@StudyMedical · 28,958
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
@shimifarhani · 72,531
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026
@royanclub · 286
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
@Mr_Nahaei · 29,106
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 6 September 2026
@JameLiive · 22,587
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 17 September 2026
@Classinoland · 28,684
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026
@Shimiimosallaei · 14,139
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 October 2026
@Ketabi_fy · 57,990
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
@karami_math7 · 33,395
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
@FARAHMAND_nia · 42,975
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
@AzmoonAmazon · 51,759
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 September 2026
@Medicall_worldd · 158,850
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
@hadianfar_shimi · 53,557
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
@yektatarmiim · 34,891
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
@pesare_konkori · 89,168
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
@Hanif_Aziimi · 76,374
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
@shojaei_physiics · 57,566
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
@Parsafarahani_1405 · 65,056
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kiarash sadat rafiei | کیارش سادات رفیعی” (@kiarashsadatrafiei), 14,097 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kiarashsadatrafiei.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.