Channel
@khunzakh_segodny
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,171subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001133083463 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khunzakh_segodny |
| Created | 8 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khunzakh_segodny |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 2,171 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 2,172 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 2,173 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:49 | 2,174 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 2,175 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 2,176 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 2,177 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 2,178 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 2,179 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 2,178 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 2,180 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 2,183 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 2,183 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
153 reactions across 23 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 137 | 89.5% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 5.88% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 3.92% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.654% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Накануне джамаат села Чиркей совместно с имамом Ибрагимом Исмаиловым совершили зияраты в Хунзахском районе, посетив могилы шейха Абумуслима и второго имама Дагестана Хамзат бега. Да примет Аллах их благие намерения, сделает эту поездку благодатной и укрепит всех нас на пути истины. Амин.
👍6
Джума Мубарак 🤲🙏🤲 Баркула киназдаго хирияб рузман къо, баракат рах1матгун бач1араб батаги, лъик1аб гьабизе квешаб тезе нилъ киназего тавфикъ кьеги.
🙏4🔥1
В церемонии открытия приняли участие врио главы Буйнакского района Табир Маликов, основатель ООО «Дорстройтех» Абдужалил Расулов и др. официальные лица. В рамках открытия местными жителями в знак благодарности было организовано очень хорошое мероприятие, участие в котором приняли и стар и млад. Так же от лица всех работников ООО «Дорстройтех» присутствующим на мероприятии детям организовали раздачу небольших но очень…
👍5
Накануне в Буйнакском районе прошло открытие участка дороги трассы Буйнакск – Верхний Каранай. Все работы по капитальному обновлению отрезка автомобильной дороги ведутся организацией ООО «Дорстройтех», основателем которой является, наш земляк, выходец из с. Хариколо Хунзахского района Расулов Абдужалил Магомедович. Как отмечают жители сел Буйнакского района работы ведутся основательно, качественно и что не маловажно…
👍5
Озон в Хунзахе вновь заработал. Адрес: с. Хунзах, улица Магомеда Дибирчуева 1.
👍5🏆1
Хунзахъ районалъул казият «РОСДАЛ ЗАХIМАТЧИ» № 29 31.07.26с. - 1448-еб соналъул сафаралъул 17-леб къо. Подписываемся на газету Хунзахского района «Сельский труженик»https://t.me/zahmatchi
👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
👍5
Ражаб-хаджи Алимчул из Хунзаха (1872-1954) - ученый, был праведным человеком. Он взял деньги в долг и в 1907 г. совершил хадж. По преданию, после хаджа он не успел пойти на зиярат к Пророку саляллагьу г1аляйгьи ва саллям в Медину, из-за того, что ухаживал за больным паломником в Мекке. Когда возвращался домой, Ражаб-хаджи сидел на палубе судна опечаленный, что не удалось попасть в Лучезарную Медину. Перед ним появилс…
👍14
Вчера с руководителем общественной палаты Хунзахского района, представителем династии нуцалов Авара - Кайтмазом Аварским побывали на могиле его предка - последнего легитимного аварского нуцала Гебека (правил с марта 1801 до февраля 1802). Находится она в селении Шотота Хунзахского района и точно была установлена только по показаниям старожилов. Дело в том, что на надмогильной плите нет надписи, что было обусловлено …
👍8
Photo, posted without a caption
👍6
Хунзахъ телевидениялъул иргадулаб передача «Ц1иял харбал» 28.07.25с. https://youtu.be/611PRvM7Cyc?si=TM1W2CPrZhZpx6Fo
👍1
Известный историк Шахбан Хапизов https://t.me/east_caucasus на старом сельском погосте, на полевых изысканиях Хунзаха.
👍9
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @khunzakh_segodny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ХунзахСегодня” (@khunzakh_segodny), 2,171 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khunzakh_segodny.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.