Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

کتابخانه مرکزی، موزه و مرکز اسناد دانشگاه خوارزمی

@khu_centlibrary

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,186subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001238479825
TypeChannel
Username@khu_centlibrary
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/khu_centlibrary

Growth

1,1861,1891,187.56 August 2026 — 1,189 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,189 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,187 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,186 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,186–1,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:341,186-1
10 Aug 2026, 19:141,187-2
7 Aug 2026, 17:301,189no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:481,189first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.5%
avg views ÷ 1,186 subscribers
Avg views / post
172
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total3,275
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1346.4%
💔725.0%
👍517.9%
👏310.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC104 viewsread 6 August 2026

🔰نقد و بررسی کتاب «چیستی ایران» نوشته محمود فتوحی در نشست بخارا؛ چیستی ایران؛ سپهر نشانه‌ای در ادبیات درباری 🔸کتاب «چیستی ایران» با عنوان فرعی «نشانه‌شناسی مفهوم ایران در ادبیات درباری» که به تازگی توسط انتشارات سخن منتشر شده، در نشستی از سلسله نشست‌های «عصر یکشنبه‌های مجله بخارا» معرفی و بررسی شد. مؤلف کتاب و سه تن از پژوهشگران درباره رویکرد نشانه‌شناختی، کارکرد سیاسی قصیده و ضرورت «پرسش از ایران» سخن گفتند. 🔸«ایر

4 Aug 2026, 02:59 UTC81 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔰اثر جدید مقصود فراستخواه منتشر شد؛ دوام ایران حاصل عاملیت بوده نه ساختار 🔸اگر ایران چند هزار سال دوام آورده است، بیش از این که حاصل ساختارها باشد به تقلای عاملان انسانی فراهم می‌شد و مستعجل بود. عاملیت‌ها افق‌گشایی و کارسازی می‌کردند. 🔸فراستخواه در پیشگفتار آورده است: «پرسش از منطق پویایی‌ها و پیدایی‌های علم‌ورزی و دانشگاه ایرانی، پرسش از اکنون ایرانی است. جنبش معرفتی و علم‌ورزی ایرانی و نهاد علم در ایران، در دامن

3 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC88 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

لذت واقعی اندیشیدن، کار کردن، نوشتن و فهمیدن همین است؛ خلاص شدن از شر خود، همچون ماری که پوست می اندازد. با رسیدن به دریافتی تازه، گویی نسخه بهینه انتزاعی تو به جای تو می نشیند. از کتاب: نزدیک ایده، جستار «گوزن در دانشگاه» نوشته یونگ و مادر کتابخانه مرکزی،موزه و مرکز اسناد دانشگاه خوارزمی 🌐پرتال کتابخانه lib.khu.ac.ir 📥تلگرام https://t.me/khu_centlibrary 🌐اینستاگرام https://www.instagram.com/khulibrary?igsh=MTY0c

1

3 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC134 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پشت پرده حذف ایران از رتبه بندی دانشگاه های تاثیرگذار پروفسور جعفر مهراد، استاد علم اطلاعات و بنیانگذار ISC دکتر جعفر مهراد، از بنیانگذاران نظام علم‌سنجی در ایران، در گفت‌وگو با لیزنا با تشریح پیگیری خود درباره خبر حذف ایران از رتبه‌بندی دانشگاه‌های تأثیرگذار تایمز ۲۰۲۶، بر نقش محدودیت‌های بین‌المللی در این موضوع تأکید کرد و گفت: ظرفیت علمی دانشگاه‌های ایران همچنان سرمایه‌ای پایدار برای حضور در نظام جهانی دانش است.

💔1

2 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC139 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📢 دسترسی پژوهشگران و دانشجویان به داده‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی فراهم شد 🔹 پژوهشگاه علوم و فناوری اطلاعات ایران (ایرانداک)، در راستای حمایت از پژوهش‌های میان‌رشته‌ای حوزه علوم اجتماعی و تسهیل دسترسی پژوهشگران به داده‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی، سامانه دریافت و تأمین داده‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی(آپدیتا) را راه‌اندازی کرده است. 📌 این سامانه امکان دریافت داده‌های مورد نیاز پژوهشگران را از طریق جست‌وجو با کلمات کلیدی انتخابی در

2 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC144 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📜یک سند،‌ یک روایت | ۵ کلوب کتابخانه دارالمعلمین عالی ۱۳۱۱ 📌این تصویر، اعضای کلوب کتابخانه دارالمعلمین عالی را در سال ۱۳۱۱ نشان می‌دهد؛ جمعی که نقش مهمی در شکل‌گیری فعالیت‌های فرهنگی و علمی این مرکز آموزشی داشتند. 📌سالنامه دارالمعلمین عالی درباره اقدامات این کلوب می‌نویسد که اعضا با مراجعه به کتابخانه‌های تهران، اطلاعات جامعی از مجموعه‌های موجود، موضوعات، نسخه‌های خطی و کتاب‌های نفیس گردآوری کردند و این اطلاعات را

3

28 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC235 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📜 یک سند،‌ یک روایت| 4 کلوب ورزش؛ تیم فوتبال دانشسرای عالی ۱۳۱۱ 📌این تصویر، اعضای تیم فوتبال کلوب ورزش دانشسرای عالی را در سال ۱۳۱۱ نشان می‌دهد. 📌بر اساس اساسنامه این کلوب، هدف آن ترویج ورزش، تقویت روحیه همکاری و ایجاد نشاط و همبستگی میان دانشجویان بود. در کنار تدوین اساسنامه و برگزاری نشست‌های آموزشی، امکانات ورزش‌هایی مانند فوتبال، والیبال و تنیس نیز برای دانشجویان فراهم شد. 📌 سالنامه دانشسرای عالی گزارش می‌دهد

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @khu_centlibrary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 584,133 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کتابخانه مرکزی، موزه و مرکز اسناد دانشگاه خوارزمی” (@khu_centlibrary), 1,186 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khu_centlibrary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.