❌2.5 %سود روی طلا 😍و یک ریسک فری از تحلیل های امروز آپدیت تحلیل هایی که امروز در کانال گذاشته بودیم امیدوارم براتون مفید بوده باشه
❤6

Channel
@khobregan_sarmaye_forex
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
11,640subscribers
+11,625 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1004452408037 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khobregan_sarmaye_forex |
| Description | مرجع تخصصی تریدرهای طلا و فارکس اینجا پازل معاملاتت کامل میشه! تحلیل، آموزش و مهندسی بازار روانشناسی معاملهگری اخبار مهم اقتصادی راه های ارتباط با پشتیبانی: (تماس+تلگرام+بله) 09361556625 @Khobregan_Sarmayeh1 09109794883 @Khobregan_Sarmayeh2 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 29 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khobregan_sarmaye_forex |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 04:19 | 11,640 | +2,717 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:40 | 8,923 | +742 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:16 | 8,181 | +692 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:54 | 7,489 | +4,609 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:39 | 2,880 | +2,099 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:10 | 781 | -5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 09:14 | 786 | -3 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 20:41 | 789 | +43 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 746 | +93 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:02 | 653 | +167 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 486 | +219 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 267 | +252 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 15 | first reading |
112 posts held, back to 29 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 95 of 102 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 112 (29 August 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 28,227 |
| Reactions total | 754 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 00:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
773 reactions across 104 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 618 | 79.9% | |
| 👍 | 119 | 15.4% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 2.59% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 1.03% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.259% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.259% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.259% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.129% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.129% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 104 of the 112 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 773 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 103 posts held from the last 30 days (8.74%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
❌2.5 %سود روی طلا 😍و یک ریسک فری از تحلیل های امروز آپدیت تحلیل هایی که امروز در کانال گذاشته بودیم امیدوارم براتون مفید بوده باشه
❤6
❌🔴 تورم آمریکا بالاتر از انتظار اعلام شد! 🇺🇸 📊 شاخص CPI ماهانه آمریکا روی ۰.۴٪ اعلام شد؛ در حالی که پیشبینیها ۰.۳٪ بود. البته رقم ماه قبل ۰.۶٪ ثبت شده بود. 📉 تحلیل بازار: تورم ماهانه با وجود کاهش نسبت به ماه قبل، همچنان بالاتر از پیشبینی بازار اعلام شد. این موضوع میتونه نشونهای از تداوم فشارهای تورمی باشه و انتظارات برای کاهش نرخ بهره فدرال رزرو رو تحت تأثیر قرار بده. 🔹 واکنش احتمالی بازار: دلار آمریکا: تمایل…
❤7
❌🔴 امروز ساعت ۱۷:۰۰؛ نگاهها به تورم آمریکا! 🇺🇸 امروز یکی از دادههای مهم اقتصادی آمریکا منتشر میشه: شاخص قیمت مصرفکننده (CPI) این شاخص نشون میده قیمت کالاها و خدمات مصرفی چقدر تغییر کرده و یکی از معیارهای مهم فدرال رزرو برای تصمیمگیری درباره نرخ بهره محسوب میشه. 📊 چرا این خبر مهمه؟ تورم بالاتر از پیشبینی → احتمال سیاست پولی سختگیرانهتر و تقویت دلار تورم پایینتر از پیشبینی → احتمال کاهش فشار برای حفظ نرخ…
👍4
Channel photo updated
دوستان حواستون باشه که همیشه در ریزش های بازار جایی که مردم عادی داراییشون رو میفروشن چه کسانی(نهنگ ها) یواشکی خرید عمده خودشون رو انجام میدن!!
❤6
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
سهام انویدیا ۳.۴ درصد سقوط کرد! هوانگ در پیامی به کارکنان انویدیا، ضمن عذرخواهی از خانواده و همکارانش، اعتراف کرد که به همسرش خیانت کرده و مسئولیت رفتارش را پذیرفت. سهام انویدیا ($NVDA) پس از انتشار خبر آغاز تحقیقات داخلی دربارهی ارتباط جنسن هوانگ با یک زن مرتبط با سرویس اطلاعاتی چین، در معاملات خارج از ساعت بازار حدود ۳.۴ درصد افت کرد. دونالد ترامپ نیز از هوانگ دفاع کرد و او را فردی قابل احترام خواند؛ هرچند گفت …
❤8
در حین این اتفاقات یک دفعه مقامات آمریکایی میرن سراغ جنسن هوانگ و میگن تو چرا با این خانم رابطه عاطفی برقرار کردی و نزدیک شدی؟؟!!! ما اطلاعاتی داریم که میگه این خانم توسط وزارت امنیت دولتی چین جذب شده بوده و وظیفش این بوده که کلی اطلاعات راجب تو و انویدیا و برنامه های پیش رو و آینده هوش مصنوعی آمریکا کسب کنه و همه این اطلاعات رو برای چین جمع آوری کنه و شما به اصطلاح توی دام "honey trap" افتادی! این شرکت megaspeed…
❤7😁2👍1
حالا این آقا که خودش زن و بچه و زندگی شخصی خودش رو داشته، با یک خانمی به اسم آلیس هوانگ(huang le) که از قضا مدیر اجرایی سابق شرکت سنگاپوری megaspeed بوده وارد رابطه عاطفی میشه و شیطون گولش میزنه اونم کسی که عملا مهره اصلی حوضه هوش مصنوعی هست و به شدت آدم امنیتی ای هستش و تحرکات تکنولوژی دنیا داره بر محور ایده های ایشون میگرده!
❤6
این آقایی که توی تصویر میبینید اسمش"جنسن هوانگ" هستش،مدیرعامل انویدیا!! انویدیا (NVIDIA) یکی از مهمترین شرکتهای جهان در توسعه زیرساختهای هوش مصنوعیه که با تولید پردازندههای گرافیکی قدرتمند، نقش اساسی در پیشرفت AI رو به گردن داشته تولید تراشه های خیلی پیشرفته و تأمین زیرساخت پردازشی شرکتهایی مثل OpenAI، مایکروسافت، گوگل و متا هم کامل با انویدیاست! انویدیا صرفاً یک شرکت تولید کارت گرافیک نیست؛ در واقع یکی از ا…
❤7
❌"هممون میدونیم که زمینِ بازی هوش مصنوعی یکی از اون چیزاییه که چین و آمریکا حساااابی سرش باهم مسابقه دارن و ترامپ هم به شدت روی هوش مصنوعی متعصب هست و اصلا دوست نداره قدرت این حوضه رو به چین واگذار کنه. ولی به نظرتون چین حاضره دست به چه کارهایی بزنه و چقدر تلاش کنه تا به اهدافش تو این مسئله برسه؟ در ادامه داستان خیلی جالب میشه😅👌"
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 112 posts we hold for @khobregan_sarmaye_forex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@khobregan_sarmaye_forex edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❌دوست داری سشنهای معاملاتی و ساعتهای مهم بازار رو با هم بررسی کنیم؟
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❌یه داستان پشت این ریزش قرار داره دوست دارید بدونید داستان این ریزش عظیم و عجیب غریب چی بود؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❌🔥 به درخواست شما دوستان، قراره نمادهای بیشتری رو همراه با تحلیل و محدودههای ورود در کانال پوشش بدیم. دوست دارید کدوم نمادها رو بیشتر تحلیل کنیم؟ 👇
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خبرگان فارکس” (@khobregan_sarmaye_forex), 11,640 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khobregan_sarmaye_forex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.