پس از پاس گل پزشکیان و همتی به واشنگتن، حالا نوبت به خانم مالواجرد رسید که مدعی شد ناوبری هوایی ایران بدون رادار انجام میشود. یک نفر جلوی گفتگوها و مصاحبههای بیموقع مسئولین کشور را بگیرد. #ویراستی ➡️ @kheymegahe_velayat
👍3

Channel
@kheymegahe_velayat
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,086subscribers
-1,809 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001295041730 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kheymegahe_velayat |
| Created | 29 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kheymegahe_velayat |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
@kheymegahe_velayat was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 8,086 | -32 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 8,118 | -122 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 8,240 | -1,218 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 9,458 | -26 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:30 | 9,484 | -605 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 10,089 | -442 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 10,531 | -154 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 10,685 | -67 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 10,752 | -26 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 10,778 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 10,785 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 10,793 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 10,801 | +971 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 9,830 | -25 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 9,855 | -27 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 9,882 | -13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 9,895 | first reading |
175 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 175 (3 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 30,135 |
| Reactions total | 108 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 23:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
819 reactions across 138 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 510 | 62.3% | |
| ❤ | 107 | 13.1% | |
| 👏 | 78 | 9.52% | |
| 🤬 | 29 | 3.54% | |
| 💔 | 23 | 2.81% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 1.59% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 1.34% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 1.22% | |
| 🤮 | 6 | 0.733% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 0.611% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.488% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.488% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 0.488% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.366% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.366% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.244% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.244% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.122% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.122% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.122% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.244% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 158 of the 175 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 870 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 175 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پس از پاس گل پزشکیان و همتی به واشنگتن، حالا نوبت به خانم مالواجرد رسید که مدعی شد ناوبری هوایی ایران بدون رادار انجام میشود. یک نفر جلوی گفتگوها و مصاحبههای بیموقع مسئولین کشور را بگیرد. #ویراستی ➡️ @kheymegahe_velayat
👍3
جنایت دیشب دولت و ارتش تروریستی آمریکا، علیه یک مجلس عروسی در خاک کشورمان، بار دیگر ماهیت ددمنشانه و خوی حیوانی و تروریستی اهالی خبیث آن جزیره بدنام «جزیره اپستین» را عیان کرد. این الگوی رفتاری، بازتولید همان جنایات سازمانیافتهای است که پیشتر در عراق و افغانستان به دفعات مشاهده شده بود. در برابر دشمنی که کینه دیرینهاش با ایران سالهاست به یک خصومت راهبردی تبدیل شده، هرگونه تعلل در اجرای یک پاسخ کوبنده و بازدارند…
👍2
🎥ویدیویی که یک رسانه خارجی از حمله ایران به کویت منتشر کرده است. ➡️ @kheymegahe_velayat
👏5👍1
🔴آخرین هشدار سرلشکر #محسن_رضایی دبیر شعام خطاب به واشنگتن: دست از حمله به مناطق مسکونی بردارید. ➡️ @kheymegahe_velayat
❤2👍1
یکی از کسانی که نامش توسط میلاد حاتمی پس از استرداد به ایران مطرح شد، پیام صادقیان بود. اینکه حالا او چگونه در برنامه میثاقی در آنتن زنده حضور پیدا میکند، یک موضوع است که حراست و همچنین حفاظت و صیانت صدا و سیما باید به آن پاسخگو باشد. مورد بعدی این است که حداقل در زمانی که این برنامه را با چنین مهمانهایی و آن سابقههای شاذ دعوت میکنید، ملت را مسخره نکنید و تصویر حضورشان را ذیل چنین مهمانانی منتشر نکنید. شأن جمهور…
👍3❤2
از دیشب تا حالا، شما صدایی از #عبدالحمید وهابی مدافع آمریکا و سعودی و دلسوز بهاییان و عناصر معاند مسلح شنیدید؟ خیر؛ زینپس هم نخواهید شنید! اگر هم ببینید و بشنوید، قطعا دوپهلو است. او عامل آمریکاست. دیشب برادران و خواهران اهل سنت ما در یک مراسم عروسی به خاک و خون کشیده شدند، از سنگ صدا آمد، اما از #عبدالحمید، نه. #پرونده_عبدالحمید ➡️ @kheymegahe_velayat
👍8👌2👏1
🔴زبانه کشیدن شعلههای آتش در پایگاههای گروهکهای تروریستی تجزیهطلب در #اربیل 🔹نقطهای که هدف قرار گرفت، محل نگهداری تجهیزات فنی و هدایت بالنهای جاسوسی آمریکا بود. ➡️ @kheymegahe_velayat
👍6👏1
یک پهپاد ام کیو-۹ در مرکز کشور ساقط شده است. و این یعنی دشمن بدنبال کشاندن جنگ به عمق کشور است ➡️ @kheymegahe_velayat
👍6
یک مراسم عروسی در سیریک هدف قرار گرفت. آمریکاییها این جنایات را در عراق و افغانستان هم در طول سالهای حضورشان بارها و بارها انجام دادند و عروسی مردم را تبدیل به عزا میکردند. ➡️ @kheymegahe_velayat
🤬5👍1😢1
✅ همسر شهید حاج حسن محقق (جانشین سازمان اطلاعات سپاه) برای اولین بار از فشارهای امنیتی و روزهای سخت جنگ ۱۲ روزه میگوید مهدیه شادمانی (فرزند شهید شادمانی)، در گفتگو با همسر شهید محقق ➡️ @kheymegahe_velayat
👍4❤1👏1
🔴سپاه ایران: حملات از سر استیصال دشمن قفل تنگه هرمز را محکمتر میکند/ رزمندگان سپاه، پاسخ پشیمانکننده متجاوزان را آغاز کردهاند روابط عمومی سپاه ایران: بسم الله قاصم الجبارین ملت بصیر و انقلابی به پاخاسته ایران اسلامی؛ تداوم حضور شما در صحنه، دشمن آمریکایی را خسته و مایوس کرده است و مقاومت و اقتدار فرزندان رشید رزمنده شما در تنگه هرمز، سردمداران کاخ سفید را کلافه کرده است. ساعاتی پیش در حملاتی کور و از سر استیصا…
❤1👍1👏1
ورود وطنفروش ممنوع کاری از بچههای دانشگاه تهران #دانشگاه #دانشجو ➡️ @kheymegahe_velayat
👍14❤2👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 175 posts we hold for @kheymegahe_velayat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خیمهگاه ولایت” (@kheymegahe_velayat), 8,086 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kheymegahe_velayat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.